FMEA/FMECA failure mode

We previously encountered failure modes and effects (FMEA) and failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) as qualitative methods for accident analysis. These tabular methods for reliability analysis may be made quantitative by associating failure rates with the parts in a systems model to estimate the system reliability. FMEA/FMECA may be applied in design or operational phases (ANSI/IEEE Std 352-1975, MIL-STD-1543 and MIL-STD-1629A). Typical headings in the F.Mld. A identify the system and component under analysis, failure modes, the ef fect i>f failure, an estimale of how critical apart is, the estimated probability of the failure, mitigaturs and IHissihiy die support systems. The style and contents of a FMEA are flexible and depend upon the. ilitcLiives of the analyst. 

In this section, the qualitative analysis aimed at identifying the hazards and failure mechanisms associated to the operation of a system is exemplified by way of a very common method known as failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA). Actually in practice, a FMECA (failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis) is typically performed to arrive at also assigning a criticality class to each failure mode, for example, according to the following ranking ... 

Failure mode and effects analysis (FMEA) and failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA)... 

In the FMECA procedure [2,3,256], an exhaustive list of the equipment is first made. Every item on the list is then reviewed for possible ways in which it can fail (the failure modes are open, closed, leaks, plugged, on, off, etc.). The effects of each failure mode are then recorded and a criticality ranking of every item of equipment is calculated. A limitation of this procedure is that combinations of failures which may cause an incident are not really identified. Failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA) is the same procedure without the criticality analysis. 

One hazards analysis technique used to analyze equipment items is FMEA. The method examines the ways in which an equipment item can fail (its failure modes) and examinees the effects or consequences of such failures. If the criticality of each failure is to be considered, then the method becomes a Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality (FMECA) Analysis. The consequences can be to do with safety, reliability, or environmental performance. 

In this chapter we explore the Failure Modes Effects Analysis (FMEA) and the Failure Modes Effects Criticality Analysis (FMECA) which, as the name suggests, simply is an extension of the FMEA.i This chapter will use the acronym EMEA and highlight those instances where is extended to include EMECA. 

The FMECA requires more information be obtained than an FMEA, particularly information dealing with the criticality and detection of the potential failure modes. 

BS5760, 1991. Reliability of Systems, Equipment and Components Part 5 Guide to Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMEA and FMECA). British Standards Institute. 

Moreover, while conducting a FMECA or FMEA, it is very difficult, if not impossible, to take into account interdependency among various failure modes and effects. This problem is particularly important in mechanical systems analysis a component failure may produce negative effects on other components, at the same or different level of the hierarchical structure of the mechanical system. 

FMEA and FMECA analysis present some important limits, mainly related to RPN evaluation. Many authors have developed different methodologies in order to overcome these disadvantages and improve the failure mode prioritization process, most of them using a fuzzy approach. 

In most organizations that have a reliability effort separate from the safety or system safety effort, an FMEA is considered a reliability tool. The safety version is called a failure modes and effects criticality analysis (FMECA). 

Used originally as a reliability tool, the FMEA is now often used to identify and prioritize safety problems associated with hardware failures. This is usually done by including a risk assessment code (RAC) in the analysis (Table 14-1). (Note When a RAC or other method of quantifying is used to identify critical safety items, some organizations and analysts call the technique failure mode and effects criticality analysis [FMECA].)... 

A system design or condition such that the failure of a component, subsystem, or system, or input to it, will automatically revert to a predetermined safe static condition or state of least critical consequence. The opposite of fail-safe is fail to danger. See also Failure Mode Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA). 

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA)... 

Assesses the likelihood of occurrence of potential misuse modes and their effect on safety before and after corrective actions. See also Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA). 

The hazard identification and evaluation of a complex process by means of a diagram or model that provides a comprehensive, overall view of the process, including its principal elements and the ways in which they are interrelated. There are four principal methods of analysis failure mode and effect, fault tree, THERP, and cost-benefit analysis. Each has a number of variations, and more than one may be combined in a single analysis. See also Cost-Benefit Analysis Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA/FMECA) Fault Tree Analysis (FTA) THERP (Technique for Human Error Rate Probability). 

FMEA is a method widely used in the industrial sector to perform reliability and safety analyses of engineering systems. It is a powerful tool used to perform analysis of each potential failure mode in a system to determine the effects of such failure modes on the total system [1,2]. When FMEA is extended to classify the effect of each potential failure according to its severity, it is called failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). 

FMEA is an analytical method used to identify potential problems in the product and in its process of development. It is an inductive method used for identification of hazards of a system with single point failure. When criticality analysis is added with FMEA it is known as failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA). It was used as early as 1950 in reliability engineering. FMEA/FMECA is mainly used for manufacturing, product development, etc. 

Successful FMEA/FMECA is helpful in identifying the potential failure mode from experience with a similar product or production process or on common physical failure logic. FMEA/FMECA is an iterative process and supports maintainability, safety, and logistic analysis. Also it is carried out at various stages of manufacturing of the product, so it is important to coordinate and ensure that at no time or stage effort is duplicated in the same program. 

Severity The measure of seriousness of the effect of failure mode (consequence of a failure classified by the degree of injury, property damage, system damage, and mission loss that could occur) it is described in FMEA/ FMECA in the scale of 1—10. 

As discussed earlier in Clause 2.0.4, there are two different approaches for FMEA/ FMECA with different purposes. One approach is top down, while the other is bottom up. Complexity of design, development stages, and amount of data availability actually determine which approach is better suited. In some complex laige systems it is not uncommon to use both in tandem. These approaches can he applied at any level. Functional analysis may be considered as an input for determining failure mode in both approaches. The top-down approach is better suited for functional analysis. 

Detection is related to causes of failure and controls, as shown in Fig. IV/2.1-1. Thus there are two ways to look at it preventive and detection control. In prevention, with the help of existing controls, failure modes are prevented, whereas the other way detects the failure and takes corrective action before it reaches the customer (see Fig. IV/2.2.1-1). FMEA/FMECA identifies the method by which occurrence of failures/failure modes is detected by the operating personnel. Audio... 

Failure is the loss of the ability of an item to provide its required function. FMEA is a logical process for identification of failure modes of the elements of a system with focus on causes of failures and the failure effects. FMECA is an extension of FMEA, where quantitative estimations of the likelihood and the severity of each failure mode... 

FAILURE MODES AND EEEECTS ANALYSIS (FMEA) also called Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA)... 

Fault trees, failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) and event trees use logic, reliability data (component failure rates), and assessed system failure rates, combined with human error failure rates (using methodologies such as HEART or THERP) and other methodologies such as software reliability assessment, to develop estimates of system failure frequencies, and hence plant accident frequencies. 

FMEA/FMecA Sometimes the number of components is just too large to make fault tree analysis practicable. In FMEA, a team identifies potential failure modes based on past experience with similar products or processes. For the assessment of system failure rate, the dangerous failure modes are listed and then probabilities are assigned and summed - this figure is then taken to be the probability of the unwanted system failure ("top event O. 

---