Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Failure modes, effects and criticality analysis

A failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) (or its simpler form, FMEA) is a systematic method of identif5dng a system failure modes. FMEA is implemented by considering each equipment item and associated systems in the plant, detailing the possible failure modes (e.g. leak or break in the case of pressure equipment), and determining their resulting effect on the rest of the system. The analysis is more concerned with specif5ung the likely effects and criticality of different modes of failure rather than the mechanisms or events leading to a specific failure [11]. [Pg.493]

FMEA is relatively simple and easy to apply, yet it is a powerful tool that may be used to improve the quality of products and processes. [Pg.493]

The method brings the focus of an analysis on consequences and additional safeguards to mitigate the effects of the failure. It is a common practice for individuals familiar with system functionality to perform FMEA, but teams of experts can produce greater insight into the mechanisms and wider range consequences. The analysis uses a form that begins with a systematic list of all components in the system  [Pg.494]

Failures are rated as critical if they have high frequency or severity ratings. In these cases, special protection measures may be considered. The strengths of FMECA are [10] [Pg.494]

Most accidents have a significant human contribution, and FMECA is not well suited to identifying these. As FMECA can be conducted at various levels, it is important to decide before starting [Pg.494]

FMECA is virtually the same as FMEA except that it also identifies the criticality of the component under study. The engineer emphasizes the probability of failure much more than in FMEA. The criticality is divided into its constituent parts  [Pg.229]

System Safety Engineering and Risk Assessment A Practical Approach [Pg.230]

All of these are combined to give the failure mode criticality number (C ) [Pg.230]

This information is then compiled in a criticality matrix, and the analysis can rank the items based on which is the most critical failure to the system. [Pg.230]

NASA s Magellan spaceaaft eventually bound for Venus suffered a fire during ground testing. A technician incorrectly mated high- and low-voltage lines. He reached around into the back of the spaceaaft—a blind mate, the connectors were of the same size and keyed the same— and connected the cables. Unable to visually verify the miss-mate, he powered on the test equipment and created a fire to the 400M spacecraft. [Pg.230]


BS 5760 1991 Part 5 - Guide to Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMEA and EM EC A). Reliability of. Systems, Equipment and Components. London BSI. [Pg.383]

We previously encountered failure modes and effects (FMEA) and failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) as qualitative methods for accident analysis. These tabular methods for reliability analysis may be made quantitative by associating failure rates with the parts in a systems model to estimate the system reliability. FMEA/FMECA may be applied in design or operational phases (ANSI/IEEE Std 352-1975, MIL-STD-1543 and MIL-STD-1629A). Typical headings in the F.Mld. A identify the system and component under analysis, failure modes, the ef fect i>f failure, an estimale of how critical apart is, the estimated probability of the failure, mitigaturs and IHissihiy die support systems. The style and contents of a FMEA are flexible and depend upon the. ilitcLiives of the analyst. [Pg.99]

FMECA - Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis. [Pg.461]

I Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis Applied to System B of... [Pg.536]

Perhaps the key to detcrnuiiiiig die consequences of an accident is die study of accident mininiization/prcvendon. This topic receives extensive treatment in Section 17.2. The estimation (not calculadon) of consequences is treated in Section 17.3, which is followed by evacuation procedures (Section 17.4). The next section e.xaniiiies failure modes, effects and critical analysis (FMECA). The cluipter concludes with vulnerability analysis (Section 17.6) and event tree analysis (Section 17.7). [Pg.484]

List tlie key features (positive or negative) of Failure Modes, Effects, and Critical Analysis. [Pg.511]

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) This method tabulates a list of equipment in the process along with all the possible failure modes for each item. The effect of a particular failure is considered with respect to the process. [Pg.460]

Failure Mode Effect (and Criticality) Analysis [FME(C)A] a technique in which all known failure modes of components or features of a system are considered in turn and undesired outcomes are noted a criticality ranking of equipment may also be estimated. [Pg.229]

Qualification of a capillary electrophoresis instrument is performed using failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis as the risk analysis tool. The instrument is broken down into its component modules and the potential failures of those components identified. The potential effect of those failures is defined and the risk characterized. Any current evaluation of those failures is identified and any recommended actions to mitigate the risk defined. [Pg.171]

From those techniques given in Table 1 my personal preference is for failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). This technique can be applied to both equipment and facilities and can be used to methodically break down the analysis of a complex process into a series of manageable steps. It is a powerful tool for summarizing the important modes of failure, the factors that may cause these failures, and their likely effects. It also incorporates the degree of severity of the consequences, their respective probabilities of occurrence, and their detectability. It must be stressed, however, that the outcome of the risk assessment process should be independent of the tool used and must be able to address all of the risks associated with the instrument that is being assessed. [Pg.172]

Failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) Empirical risk management (ERA)... [Pg.173]

The principles utilized in these expert systems are general purpose and based on failure modes, effects and critically analysis, FMECA, a sub-process of reliability centred maintenance, RCM, and statistical process control, SPC. The analysis paradigm includes ... [Pg.488]


See other pages where Failure modes, effects and criticality analysis is mentioned: [Pg.84]    [Pg.2286]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.334]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.2041]    [Pg.499]    [Pg.710]    [Pg.726]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.2574]    [Pg.2554]    [Pg.2290]   


SEARCH



Critical analysis

Critical effect

Critical effective

Effect Analysis

Effective modes

Failure Mode Effect Analysis

Failure Mode, Effects and Critical Analysis (FMECA)

Failure Modes, Effects, and Critical Analysis

Failure Modes, Effects, and Critical Analysis

Failure criticality analysis

Failure effects

Failure mode and effect

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis FMECA)

Failure modes

© 2024 chempedia.info