Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis FMECA

1 Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) 

FMECA is an extended version of FMEA. More specifically, when FMEA is extended to categorize or group each potential failure effect in regard to its level of severity (this includes documenting critical and catastrophic failures), the method is referred to as FMECA. The FMECA method was 

Various types of information are needed to perform FMECA effechvely. In particular, the design-related information needed for the FMECA includes system schematics, design descriptions, operating specifications and limitations, equipment/part drawings, interface specifications, functional block diagrams, field service data, reliability data, configuration management-related data, effects of environment on item under consideration, and relevant specifications (i.e., company, customer, etc.) [3]. 

---

We previously encountered failure modes and effects (FMEA) and failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) as qualitative methods for accident analysis. These tabular methods for reliability analysis may be made quantitative by associating failure rates with the parts in a systems model to estimate the system reliability. FMEA/FMECA may be applied in design or operational phases (ANSI/IEEE Std 352-1975, MIL-STD-1543 and MIL-STD-1629A). Typical headings in the F.Mld. A identify the system and component under analysis, failure modes, the ef fect i>f failure, an estimale of how critical apart is, the estimated probability of the failure, mitigaturs and IHissihiy die support systems. The style and contents of a FMEA are flexible and depend upon the. ilitcLiives of the analyst. 

Perhaps the key to detcrnuiiiiig die consequences of an accident is die study of accident mininiization/prcvendon. This topic receives extensive treatment in Section 17.2. The estimation (not calculadon) of consequences is treated in Section 17.3, which is followed by evacuation procedures (Section 17.4). The next section e.xaniiiies failure modes, effects and critical analysis (FMECA). The cluipter concludes with vulnerability analysis (Section 17.6) and event tree analysis (Section 17.7). 

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) This method tabulates a list of equipment in the process along with all the possible failure modes for each item. The effect of a particular failure is considered with respect to the process. 

From those techniques given in Table 1 my personal preference is for failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). This technique can be applied to both equipment and facilities and can be used to methodically break down the analysis of a complex process into a series of manageable steps. It is a powerful tool for summarizing the important modes of failure, the factors that may cause these failures, and their likely effects. It also incorporates the degree of severity of the consequences, their respective probabilities of occurrence, and their detectability. It must be stressed, however, that the outcome of the risk assessment process should be independent of the tool used and must be able to address all of the risks associated with the instrument that is being assessed. 

Failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) Empirical risk management (ERA)... 

The principles utilized in these expert systems are general purpose and based on failure modes, effects and critically analysis, FMECA, a sub-process of reliability centred maintenance, RCM, and statistical process control, SPC. The analysis paradigm includes ... 

Borgovini, Pemberton, R., Ross, S., 1993. Failure Mode, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). Reliability Analysis Center. 

FMEA is a method widely used in the industrial sector to perform reliability and safety analyses of engineering systems. It is a powerful tool used to perform analysis of each potential failure mode in a system to determine the effects of such failure modes on the total system [1,2]. When FMEA is extended to classify the effect of each potential failure according to its severity, it is called failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA). 

The causes of hazards and functional failures are broken down, e.g. via Fault Tree Analysis (FTA). Other typical techniques are the Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) and the production of a Reliability Availability Maintainability Modelling and Prediction Report (RAM MPR), containing reliability block diagrams of the system. 

Asset based bottom-up approaches such as Hazard and Operability Study (HAZOP) and Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMECA) are relevant, but provide no guarantee of completeness and do not consider unwanted synergies and multiple failure leading to catastrophic outcomes. 

Failure Modes and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a hazards analysis technique used to analyze equipment items. The method examines the ways in which an equipment item can fail (its failure modes), and examines the effects or consequences of such failures. If the criticality of each failure is to be considered, then the method becomes a Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). The consequences have to do with safety, reliability, or environmental performance. 

FMEA is an analytical method used to identify potential problems in the product and in its process of development. It is an inductive method used for identification of hazards of a system with single point failure. When criticality analysis is added with FMEA it is known as failure mode effect and criticality analysis (FMECA). It was used as early as 1950 in reliability engineering. FMEA/FMECA is mainly used for manufacturing, product development, etc. 

When the analysis includes evaluation of the criticality of the various failures, this method is referred to as Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA). 

Three nonsafety tools are used in safety analysis failure modes, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) human factors analysis and software analysis. Because these techniques are extremely helpful in finding eqnipment failures, human errors, and software mistakes, safety engineers have coupled them to their safety analyses. It is definitely worthwhile to understand how these tools can benefit you. 

Fault trees, failure modes and effects analysis (FMEA), failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) and event trees use logic, reliability data (component failure rates), and assessed system failure rates, combined with human error failure rates (using methodologies such as HEART or THERP) and other methodologies such as software reliability assessment, to develop estimates of system failure frequencies, and hence plant accident frequencies. 

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FEMA)—FEMA is a tabulation of facility equipment items, their potential failure modes, and the effects of these failures on the equipment or facility. Failure mode is simply a description of what caused the equipment to fail. The effect is the incident, consequence, or system response to the failure. It is usually depicted in tabular format and expresses failures in an annual estimation. A FEMA is not useful for identifying combinations of failures that can lead to incidents. It may be used in conjunction with other hazard identification techniques such as HAZOP for special investigations such as critical or complex instrumentation systems. There is also a Failure Modes, Effects, and Criticality Analysis (FMECA), which is a variation of FMEA that includes a quantitative estimate of the significance of the consequence of a failure mode. 

A failure modes, effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) (or its simpler form, FMEA) is a systematic method of identif5dng a system failure modes. FMEA is implemented by considering each equipment item and associated systems in the plant, detailing the possible failure modes (e.g. leak or break in the case of pressure equipment), and determining their resulting effect on the rest of the system. The analysis is more concerned with specif5ung the likely effects and criticality of different modes of failure rather than the mechanisms or events leading to a specific failure [11]. 

---