Failure Modes, Effects and Critical Analysis

The first step in FMECA is to determine a level of resolution. If a system-level liazard is to be addressed, equipment in die system must be studied for a plant-level hazard, individual systems within die plant must be examined. Once the level of resolution luis been determined, a format must be developed-one to be used consistendy tlu oughout die study. A minimal format should include each item, its description, failure modes, effects, and criticality ranking. 

The FMECA table should be concise, complete, and well organized. This table should identify equipment and relate it to a system drawing or location. This is to prevent confusion when similar equipment is used in different locations. One of tlie limitations of FMECA is tliat the table must include ALL failure modes for each piece of equipment and effects of each failure along witli tlie associated criticality ranking. Table 17.5.3 shows a sample chart tliat can be completed for tlie FMECA table. 

The final step in conducting a FMECA is to report tlie results. If tlie prepared table (see Table 17.5.3) is complete, tliat may be sufficient. Often, however, a report of suggested design changes or alterations should also be included. 

It should be noted tliat FMECA identifies single failure modes tliat eitlier directly result in or contribute significantly to important accidents. Human/operator errors are generally not examined in a FMECA however, tlie effects of a misoperation are usually described by an equipment failure mode. It should also be noted that FMECA is not efficient for identifying combinations of equipment failures tliat lead to accidents. 

Tlie level of resolution of tlie study must be determined 

---

BS 5760 1991 Part 5 - Guide to Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis (FMEA and EM EC A). Reliability of. Systems, Equipment and Components. London BSI. 

We previously encountered failure modes and effects (FMEA) and failure modes effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) as qualitative methods for accident analysis. These tabular methods for reliability analysis may be made quantitative by associating failure rates with the parts in a systems model to estimate the system reliability. FMEA/FMECA may be applied in design or operational phases (ANSI/IEEE Std 352-1975, MIL-STD-1543 and MIL-STD-1629A). Typical headings in the F.Mld. A identify the system and component under analysis, failure modes, the ef fect i>f failure, an estimale of how critical apart is, the estimated probability of the failure, mitigaturs and IHissihiy die support systems. The style and contents of a FMEA are flexible and depend upon the. ilitcLiives of the analyst. 

FMECA - Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis. 

I Failure Modes Effects and Criticality Analysis Applied to System B of... 

Perhaps the key to detcrnuiiiiig die consequences of an accident is die study of accident mininiization/prcvendon. This topic receives extensive treatment in Section 17.2. The estimation (not calculadon) of consequences is treated in Section 17.3, which is followed by evacuation procedures (Section 17.4). The next section e.xaniiiies failure modes, effects and critical analysis (FMECA). The cluipter concludes with vulnerability analysis (Section 17.6) and event tree analysis (Section 17.7). 

List tlie key features (positive or negative) of Failure Modes, Effects, and Critical Analysis. 

Failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA) This method tabulates a list of equipment in the process along with all the possible failure modes for each item. The effect of a particular failure is considered with respect to the process. 

Failure Mode Effect (and Criticality) Analysis [FME(C)A] a technique in which all known failure modes of components or features of a system are considered in turn and undesired outcomes are noted a criticality ranking of equipment may also be estimated. 

Qualification of a capillary electrophoresis instrument is performed using failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis as the risk analysis tool. The instrument is broken down into its component modules and the potential failures of those components identified. The potential effect of those failures is defined and the risk characterized. Any current evaluation of those failures is identified and any recommended actions to mitigate the risk defined. 

From those techniques given in Table 1 my personal preference is for failure mode, effects, and criticality analysis (FMECA). This technique can be applied to both equipment and facilities and can be used to methodically break down the analysis of a complex process into a series of manageable steps. It is a powerful tool for summarizing the important modes of failure, the factors that may cause these failures, and their likely effects. It also incorporates the degree of severity of the consequences, their respective probabilities of occurrence, and their detectability. It must be stressed, however, that the outcome of the risk assessment process should be independent of the tool used and must be able to address all of the risks associated with the instrument that is being assessed. 

Failure mode effects and criticality analysis (FMECA) Empirical risk management (ERA)... 

The principles utilized in these expert systems are general purpose and based on failure modes, effects and critically analysis, FMECA, a sub-process of reliability centred maintenance, RCM, and statistical process control, SPC. The analysis paradigm includes ... 

---