Evaluating baseline characteristics

It is common practice in analyses of clinical data to inspect the distributions of baseline characteristics - for example, demographics and measures of disease severity - through the use of descriptive summary statistics. This is an important analysis because it helps to describe the sample representing the target population of interest. If the sample is representative of the target population the inferences drawn from the study will be considered relevant. 

When there is evidence to suggest a baseline imbalance with respect to a characteristic that 

---

We selected two samples for the sequence comparisons. The first sample was a 1 mM ubiquitin protein dissolved in 90% H2O with 10% D2O with 1 mM DSS as an internal reference. The sample was deliberatively shortened to 550 uL to make the shimming less effective. The sample was symmetrically shimmed, but only dovm to a linewidth (50% height) of 1 Hz. This sample was used to evaluate the solvent amplitude after suppression and to give insight into the relative effect (if any) of the solute signals on an 800 MHz instrument equipped with 5 mm HCN cold probe. The results of the tests were discussed in Section 4.1. The second sample was a 10 mM N-acetyl-asparagine in 98% D2O (600 uL) also symmetrically shimmed with a final width at 50% height of 0.77 Hz. This sample was ideal in terms of efficient solvent suppression and was used to compare and evaluate the baseline characteristics and off-resonance effects of the sequences on solute suppression (Section 4.2). 

Proposed Analysis. The first step is to evaluate normative properties to establish a baseline for treatment design, then to evaluate dysfunction characteristics, scope, and extent of disintegration. Most deterioration appears to have occurred close enough to the surface for evaluation and treat-... 

WAVE investigators. The effects of oral anticoagulants in patients witii peripheral arterial disease rationale, design, and baseline characteristics of tiie Warfarin and Antiplatelet Vascular Evaluation (WA ) trial, including a meta-analysis of trials. Am Heart J (2006) 151, 1-9. 

In subgroup analysis, it may become necessary to examine multiple, often numerous, subgroups based on baseline characteristics. This is in addition to a potentially large number of types of adverse events (e.g., MedDRA Preferred Term [PT] level. Standardized MedDRA Queries) that need to be evaluated for safety assessment. 

One can identify two major categories of uncertainty in EIA data (scientific) uncertainty inherited in input data (e.g., incomplete or irrelevant baseline information, project characteristics, the misidentification of sources of impacts, as well as secondary, and cumulative impacts) and in impact prediction based on these data (lack of scientific evidence on the nature of affected objects and impacts, the misidentification of source-pathway-receptor relationships, model errors, misuse of proxy data from the analogous contexts) and decision (societal) uncertainty resulting from, e.g., inadequate scoping of impacts, imperfection of impact evaluation (e.g., insufficient provisions for public participation), human factor in formal decision-making (e.g., subjectivity, bias, any kind of pressure on a decision-maker), lack of strategic plans and policies and possible implications of nearby developments (Demidova, 2002). 

The traditional method of determining the position of an analyte spot on the plates is a visual evaluation. However, this technique is highly subjective and depends considerably on the expertise of the analytical chemist. TLC scanners, developed for exact determination not only pinpoint position but also the area, intensity and symmetry of the spot, overcome the uncertainty of the visual evaluation. Moreover, TLC scanners make possible more accurate determination of the quantity of analyte in the spot by converting spot characteristics into peak characteristics. Peak height is the distance between the peak maximum and the baseline, whereas peak area is the area of the peak between the beginning and end of the peak and the baseline. 

A similar table may be presented for demographic characteristics. Specific characteristics that are important can vary from study to study, but typical ones include gender, age, race, and baseline data of relevance, e.g., weight, blood pressure, and heart rate. Information concerning the use of concomitant or concurrent medications and evaluations of subject adherence or compliance with the trial s treatment schedule is also typically presented. 

The enterprise seleets the appropriate verification method [inspection, analysis (including mock-ups or simulations), demonstration, or test] for evaluating whether functional and performance requirements, and design characteristic identified in the design architecture, are satisfied. A verification matrix is developed to trace the verification method(s) to requirements of the functional architecture and rcquirements baseline. The enterprise also selects the models or prototypes to be used, which may be partial or complete, and may or may not include humans depending on the purpose and objectives of the verification task. 

To evaluate the thermal stability of the blends, the characteristics of the first degradation step were determined from the TGA and DTG curves the onset temperature, Ti(o) (the intersection of the extrapolated baseline with the inflection tangent) the temperature at the maximum rate of PVC degradation, Tifm) the degree of conversion at the corresponding maximum rate, ai(m) and the mass loss at the end of the first degradation step, Am-i. 

Both interview and questionnaire techniques were used in this survey. Fifty, semi-structured interviews were conducted on-site with a randomly selected, representative, stratified sample of employees. (See Appendix B for an example of some of the prompt questions used in the interview note that this can only be developed after some open interviews/discussion sessions are completed.) A questiormaire was generated from the interview data and distributed to 520 staff to be completed anonymously. This produced a 45 per cent usable response rate for analysis. The objectives were to gain an understanding of the perceptions of quality within the company and readiness for change to provide baseline data for evaluation purposes to identify quality improvement opportunities and potential barriers to change and to help management develop a sense of awareness about quality and quality improvement needs in the plant. The questionnaire included measures of job satisfaction (Warr et aL, 1979), organizational commitment (Porter et al., 1974), perceptions of cooperation and morale in the plant and measures of certain job characteristics associated with quality work performance, such as skill variety, autonomy and feedback (Hackman and Oldham, 1975). 

---