Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

EPA Methode

Source sampling of particulates requites isokinetic removal of a composite sample from the stack or vent effluent to determine representative emission rates. Samples are coUected either extractively or using an in-stack filter EPA Method 5 is representative of extractive sampling, EPA Method 17 of in-stack filtration. Other means of source sampling have been used, but they have been largely supplanted by EPA methods. Continuous in-stack monitors of opacity utilize attenuation of radiation across the effluent. Opacity measurements are affected by the particle size, shape, size distribution, refractive index, and the wavelength of the radiation (25,26). [Pg.384]

U.S. EPA, Method SCI-Determination of Nitrogen- and Phosphorus Containing Pesticides in Ground Water hy GCj NPD, draft, Apr. 15, 1988 available from U.S. EPA Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory, Cincinnati, Ohio, 1988. [Pg.61]

Molecular Weight EPA Method 3 is used to determine carbon dioxide and oxygen concentrations and dry molecular weight of the stack-gas stream. Depending on the intended use of the data, these values can be obtained with an integrated sample (see Fig. 25-28) or a grab sample (see Fig. 25-29). In addition, the instrumental analyzer... [Pg.2198]

Tbe multiple metals method is also currently published as Draft EPA Method 29 for inclusion in 40 CFR 60. f Full citation is Test Methods for T valuating Solid Waste Vhysical/Chemical Methods, SW-846, 3d ed., July 1992. [Pg.2199]

The instrumental analyzer procedure, EPA Method 3A, is commonly used for the determination of oxygen and carbon dioxide concentrations in emissions from stationary sources. An integrated continuous gas sample is extracted from the test location and a portion of the sample is conveyed to one or more instrumental analyzers for determination of O9 and CO9 gas concentrations (see Fig. 25-30). The sample gas is conditioned prior to introduction to the gas analyzer by removing particulate matter and moisture. Sampling is conducted at a constant rate for the entire test run. Performance specifications and test procedures are provided in the method to ensure reliable data. [Pg.2199]

Moisture Content EPA Method 4 is the reference method for determining the moisture content of the stack gas. A value for moisture content is needed in some of the calculations for determining pollution-emission rates. [Pg.2199]

Particulates Procedures for testing a particulate source are more detailed than those used for sampling gases. Because particulates exhibit inertial effects and are not uniformly distributed within a stack, sampling to obtain a representative sample is more complex than for gaseous pollutants. EPA Method 5 (as shown in Fig. 25-32) is the most widely used procedure for determination of particulate emissions from a stationary source. In-stack samphng guidehnes are presented in EPA Method 17. [Pg.2199]

Sulfur Dioxide EPA Method 6 is the reference method for determining emissions of sulfur dioxide (SO9) from stationary sources. As the gas goes through the sampling apparatus (see Fig. 25-33), the sulfuric acid mist and sulfur trioxide are removed, the SO9 is removed by a chemical reaction with a hydrogen peroxide solution, and, finally, the sample gas volume is measured. Upon completion of the rim, the sulfuric acid mist and sulfur trioxide are discarded, and the collected material containing the SO9 is recovered for analysis at the laboratory. The concentration of SO9 in the sample is determined by a titration method. [Pg.2200]

Nitrogen Oxides (NO ) EPA Method 7 is the reference method for determining emissions of nitrogen oxides from stationaiy sources. Samphng for NO by this method is relatively simple with the proper equipment. [Pg.2200]

EPA Method 25A is the instrumental analyzer method for determination of total gaseous organic concentration using a flame ionization analyzer. The method apphes to the measurement of total gaseous organic concentration of vapors consisting primarily of alkanes, alkenes, and/or arenes (aromatic hydrocarbons). The concentration is expressed in terms of propane (or other appropriate organic calibration gas) or in terms or carrion. [Pg.2204]

Hydrogen Chloride (HCl) EPA Method 26 is the reference method used to measure hydrogen chloride emissions from stationaiy sources. The method is applicable for determining emissions of hydrogen halides (HX) such as hydrogen chloride (HCl), hydrogen... [Pg.2205]

Semivolatile Organics Sampling EPA Method 0010 as contained in Test Methods for Evaluating Solid Waste, 3d ed., Report No. [Pg.2207]

SW-846, is used to measure emissions of semivolatile principal organic constituents. Method 0010 is designed to determine destruction and removal efficiency (DRE) of POHCs from incineration systems. The method involves a modification of the EPA Method 5 sampling train and may be used to determine particulate emission rates from stationary sources. The method is applied to semivolatile compounds, including polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), chlorinated dibenzodioxins and dibenzofurans, polycyclic organic matter, and other semivolatile organic compounds. [Pg.2207]

For selective estimation of phenols pollution of environment such chromatographic methods as gas chromatography with flame-ionization detector (ISO method 8165) and high performance liquid chromatography with UV-detector (EPA method 625) is recommended. For determination of phenol, cresols, chlorophenols in environmental samples application of HPLC with amperometric detector is perspective. Phenols and chlorophenols can be easy oxidized and determined with high sensitivity on carbon-glass electrode. [Pg.129]

After adequate analitical prepai ation according to standai d EPA method 608 samples were analysed gas chromatographic on a gas chromatograph 8500 Perkin Elmer, in glass and capilar columns using a capture electron detector and mass spectrometry, temperature program. [Pg.227]

American Chemical Society. EPA Methods (Iris, Air Toxics, and Pesticide Methods) (1155 16th Street, N.W., Washington, DC)... [Pg.125]

Field Tests. Recently we conducted a field test at a site contaminated with fuel oil. Our measurements were 0.0625 0.0212 mA for the well water and 0.0189 0.0119 mA for distilled water (showing errors of one standard deviation). From calibration curves, these numbers can be reported as equivalent to 50 ppb phenol or 34 ppb xylenes. Nine-month-old laboratory results (EPA method 624 and GC/FID) for this site indicated concentrations of 25 ppb for benzene, toluene, and xylenes combined and 100 ppb for fuel oil. The important result is the significant difference between the distilled-water and well-water measurements. We are very encouraged by these results and are planning future field tests. [Pg.236]

EPA. 1987d. Project summary Single laboratory validation of EPA method 8140. Las Vegas, NV U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA 600/S4-87-009. [Pg.205]

GC/ECD and GC/MS (EPA Method 608) are the methods recommended for determining a-endosulfan, (3-endosulfan, and endosulfan sulfate in municipal and industrial discharges (EPA 1991a). Sample clean-... [Pg.253]

A brief summary of EPA method requirements for tolerance enforcement methods is given in Table 1. Taken in total, these requirements ensure that the means to conduct the method are available to laboratories and that experimental evidence to establish method performance, on a substrate-by-substrate basis, is generated prior to analysis of samples and as part of each analytical set. Thus, an analyst who must generate data to support method performance in his or her hands can obtain whatever is required to reproduce the method. [Pg.721]

In 1994, only 15% of EPA method validations (tolerance method validation and environmental chemistry method validations) that involved GC were carried out using GC/MS. In 2002, this number is reversed in that 85% of the GC methods that were validated by both programs used GC/MS. Many of the compounds investigated in these method trials were polar compounds, and hence these compounds required derivatization in order to be amenable to GC. One common methylating agent is (trimethylsilyl)diazomethane, which is used, for example, to methylate the sulfonamide flumetsulam. As opposed to HPLC/MS, where derivatization is often not necessary, the GC/MS procedure involves an extra step to methylate this compound, under dry conditions, prior to determination by GC/MS. [Pg.762]

For the charcoal, XAD, and PUF adsorbents discussed above, solvent extraction techniques have been developed for the removal and concentration of trapped analytes. Although thermal desorption has been used with Tenax-GC in some specialized air sampling situations [primarily with sampling volatile organic compounds (EPA, Method TO-17 )], this approach is not a viable alternative to solvent extraction for the charcoal, XAD, and PUF adsorbents. The polystyrene and PUF adsorbents are thermally unstable and the charcoal chemisorption bonding is more easily broken by... [Pg.920]


See other pages where EPA Methode is mentioned: [Pg.50]    [Pg.401]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.2198]    [Pg.2200]    [Pg.2202]    [Pg.2202]    [Pg.2203]    [Pg.2203]    [Pg.2205]    [Pg.2206]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.1034]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.241]    [Pg.321]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.416]    [Pg.606]    [Pg.722]    [Pg.758]    [Pg.836]    [Pg.921]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.191 , Pg.437 ]




SEARCH



EPA

EPA Method 8015, modified

EPA Methods and Performance-based Analyses

EPA method

EPA method

Methods US EPA

U. S. EPA Method

© 2024 chempedia.info