Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Energy measurements

Fig. XII-12. Top friction traces for two calcium alkylbenzenesulfonate monolayers on mica where the monolayers are in a liquidlike state. A—in inert air atmosphere B—in saturated decane vapor. Bottom contact radius-load curves showing adhesion energy measured under the same conditions as the friction traces. (From Ref. 53.)... Fig. XII-12. Top friction traces for two calcium alkylbenzenesulfonate monolayers on mica where the monolayers are in a liquidlike state. A—in inert air atmosphere B—in saturated decane vapor. Bottom contact radius-load curves showing adhesion energy measured under the same conditions as the friction traces. (From Ref. 53.)...
The donor level (-1- / 0) corresponds to the ionization energy essentially identical configurations. The ionization energy measured by pSR is very close to the donor level obtained for hydrogen by DLTS [30], 0.175 0.005 eV. [Pg.2886]

When the energy measurement is made, the state nP.j will be found iDfj fraction of the time. [Pg.50]

P-i) Then, when this P.i state was subjected to energy measurement, knowledge of the... [Pg.573]

The sensitivity and depth resolution of ERDA depend on the type of projectile, on the type of particle, and on energy measurement. Because of the broad range of particles and methods used, general statements about sensitivity and depth resolution are hardly possible. Recent reviews of ERDA techniques are available [3.152-3.154]. [Pg.162]

Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation. Fig. 22. Nomialized pull-off energy measured for polyethylene-polyethylene contact measured using the SFA. (a) P versus rate of crack propagation for PE-PE contact. Change in the rate of separation does not seem to affect the measured pull-off force, (b) Normalized pull-off energy, Pn as a function of contact time for PE-PE contact. At shorter contact times, P does not significantly depend on contact time. However, as the surfaces remain in contact for long times, the pull-off energy increases with time. In seinicrystalline PE, the crystalline domains act as physical crosslinks for the relatively mobile amorphous domains. These amorphous domains can interdiffuse across the interface and thereby increase the adhesion of the interface. This time dependence of the adhesion strength is different from viscoelastic behavior in the sense that it is independent of rate of crack propagation.
An example of interaction stiffness and force curves for a Si surface with a native oxide at 60% relative humidity (RH) is shown in Fig. 12 [104]. The stiffness and force data show an adhesive interaction between the tip and substrate. The hysteresis on retraction is due to a real change in contact area from surface oxide deformation and is not an experimental artifact. The adhesive force observed during retraction was consistent with capillary condensation and the surface energy measured from the adhesive force was close to that of water. [Pg.210]

Step 1.3 Identify and Allocate Additional Resources. The audit may require external resources, such as laboratory facilities and possibly equipment for air sampling, flow measurements, energy measurements, and product-quality testing. [Pg.358]

The T-connection in the original vortex exhaust will increase the pressure loss and increase the consumption of energy. Measurements of the pressure difference in the two versions show a sevenfold higher pressure difference in the original version (Fig. 12.396) compared with the pressure difference in the simplified version (Fig. 12.39c). This fact is very important in connection with selection of a given solution. [Pg.1193]

This energy measure is equal to Brode s definition of the energy, multiplied by a factor 2. The reason for the multiplication is that the Brode definition applies to free-air burst, while Eq. (6.3.15) is for a surface burst. In a fiee-air burst, explosion energy is spread over twice the volume of air. [Pg.206]

Figure 10-10. (a) Semilogarillnnic plol of ihc stimulated emission transients for various excitation pulse energies measured for LPPP on glass. The excitation pulses have a duration of 150 fs and are centered at 400 nm. The probe pulse were spectrally filtered (Ao=500nin, Aa=l0nm). (b) Emission spectra recorded for the same excitation conditions. The spectra are normalized at the purely electronic emission baud (according lo Ref. [181). [Pg.173]

Theoretical mathematical expression of energy measurement related to the second law of thermodynamics. Essentially a measurement of relative quantities of energy distribution, and reported in units of Btu/lb. or J/kg. [Pg.732]

Benson [499] and Livingstone [500] considered the influence of experimental accuracy on measured rate and temperature coefficients. To measure the rate coefficient to 0.1%, the relative errors in each ctj value must be <0.1% and the reaction interval should be at least 50%. Temperature control to achieve this level of precision must be 0.003% or 0.01 K at 300 K. For temperature control to 1 K, the minimum error in the rate coefficient is 5% and in the activation energy, measured over a 20 K interval, is 10%. No allowance is included in these calculations for additional factors such as self-heating or cooling. [Pg.83]

A comparative study [10] is made for crystal-growth kinetics of Na2HP04 in SCISR and a fluidized bed crystallizer (FBC). The details of the latter cem be found in [11]. Experiments are carried out at rigorously controlled super-saturations without nucleation. The overall growth rate coefficient, K, are determined from the measured values for the initial mean diameter, t/po, masses of seed crystals before and after growth. The results show that the values for K measured in ISC are systematically greater than those in FBC by 15 to 20%, as can be seen in Table 2. On the other hand, the values for the overall active energy measured in ISC and FBC are essentially the same. [Pg.535]

Both the reactors are operated in batch, and the concentrations of components involved are measured online by electro-conductivity. Data interpretation is made by the kinetic equation of second order. The results obtained in the range of 25-45"C are given in Table 3. Again, the values for the rate constant measured in SCISR, ks, are S5 tematically higher than those in STR, ksr, by about 20%, and no significant difference betvi een the values for the active energy measured in SCISR and STR has been found. [Pg.536]

Figure 23. This caricature demonstrates the predicted phenomena of energy level crossing in domains whose energy bias is comparable or larger than the vibronic frequency of the domain wall distortions. The vertical axis is the energy measured from the bottom state the horizontal axis denotes temperature. The diagonal da ed line denotes roughly the thermal energies. A tunneling center that would become thermally active at some temperature Tq will not possess ripplons whose frequency is less than To. Figure 23. This caricature demonstrates the predicted phenomena of energy level crossing in domains whose energy bias is comparable or larger than the vibronic frequency of the domain wall distortions. The vertical axis is the energy measured from the bottom state the horizontal axis denotes temperature. The diagonal da ed line denotes roughly the thermal energies. A tunneling center that would become thermally active at some temperature Tq will not possess ripplons whose frequency is less than To.
Electronegativity measures how strongly an atom attracts the electrons in a chemical bond. This property of an atom involved in a bond is related to but distinct from ionization energy and electron affinity. As described in Chapter 8, ionization energy measures how strongly an atom attracts one of its own electrons. Electron affinity specifies how strongly an atom attracts a free electron. Figure 9 6 provides a visual summary of these three... [Pg.578]

Consider the number of valence electrons in each element. clO-0095. The following energies measure the strength of bonding in sodium, magnesium, and aluminum... [Pg.740]


See other pages where Energy measurements is mentioned: [Pg.451]    [Pg.1173]    [Pg.1174]    [Pg.1847]    [Pg.14]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.226]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.114]    [Pg.143]    [Pg.193]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.711]    [Pg.568]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.802]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.700]    [Pg.222]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.153]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.85 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.237 ]




SEARCH



A labelled glucose analogue an indirect probe to measure energy metabolism

A review of measured product energy distributions for some simple chemical reactions

Activation energies measuring

Activation energy determination different measurement techniques

Activation energy measured

Activation energy sticking probability measurements

Activation energy, measurement

Alpha energy concentration measurement

Animal calorimetry methods for measuring heat production and energy retention

Apparent activation energy, measurement

Chemisorption measure the rate and activation energy of adsorption

Conformational free energy, definition measurement

Contact angles surface energies measured

Debond energy measurements

Differential scanning calorimetry energy, measurement

Diffusivity measured activation energy

ENTROPY IS A MEASURE OF DISPERSED ENERGY

Electron binding energies measurements

Electron energy-resolved measurements

Electron impact measurements, ionization energies

Energy and the Measurement of Heat

Energy calibration work function measurement

Energy caloric measurements

Energy changes, measurement

Energy consumption efficiency measures

Energy expenditure measurement

Energy experimental measurement

Energy inputs measures

Energy measures, cost effectiveness

Energy retention - measurement

Energy spectrum measured

Energy transfer fluorescence measurements

Energy, free measurement

Energy-Resolved Measurements

Experimental Measurements of the Adhesive Energy

Fluorescence measurements of energy

Fluorescence measurements of energy transfer

Fluorescence resonance energy time-resolved measurements

Forster resonance energy transfer efficiency measurement

Forster resonance energy transfer efficiency, measuring

Forster resonance energy transfer measurement

Fracture energy, interfacial measurement

Free energy experimental measurement

Ignition energy dust explosions, measurement

Interfacial energy measurement

Interfacial free energy measurement

Internal energy from measurables

Internal energy measurements

Joule A unit of measurement for energy

Kinetic energy measurement methods

Kinetic energy release measurements

Liquid surface energy measurement

Measurement of a Neutron Energy Spectrum by Proton Recoil

Measurement of energy

Measurement of energy changes

Measurement of energy transfer efficiency from Trp residues to TNS

Measurement of high-energy beta-or gamma-radiation

Measurement of surface free energy

Measurement units, energy

Measurements for energy

Measuring Energy Changes

Measuring Surface Energy

Measuring fracture energy

Measuring laser power and pulse energy

Metric system energy measurement

Neutron Energy Measurement with a Crystal Spectrometer

Photoemission Measurements of Schottky Energy Barriers

Potential energy surface Pulse-measurements

Precision in Measurements of Activation Energies

Radiometric energy measurement

Resonance energy transfer distance measurement

Resonance energy transfer measurement techniques

Resonance energy transfer polarization measurements

Single molecule fluorescence resonance energy transfer measurements

Solid surface energy measurement techniques

Strain energies as a measure of reactivity

Surface anchoring energy measurement

Surface bond energies, measurement

Surface energy direct measurement

Surface energy measurement

Surface energy, molecular measurement

Surface free energy measurement

Techniques for Measuring Anchoring Energies

Techniques that use the Laplace equation to measure surface energy

The measurement of surface free energies

Units of measure for energy

Units of measurement for energy

Whole body energy expenditure, measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info