Model domain

Neural networks have the following advantages (/) once trained, their response to input data is extremely fast (2) they are tolerant of noisy and incomplete input data (J) they do not require knowledge engineering and can be built direcdy from example data (4) they do not require either domain models or models of problem solving and (5) they can store large amounts of information implicitly. 

Although the electron domain model is, as we shall see, a very useful model, we must remember that it is just that, a model—indeed a very approximate model. We cannot observe the individual domains of electrons but only the total electron density distribution. 

Figure 4.10 AX4, AX3E, and AX2E2 molecules (a) tangent sphere models or domain models with spherical domains B is a bonding pair and E is a lone pair and (b) conventional bond line structures.

Figure 4.16 Double bond (a) Lewis model of two tetrahedra sharing an edge, (b) Domain model the two single electron pair domains of the double bond are pulled in toward each other by the attraction of the two carbon cores forming one four-electron double-bond domain with a prolate ellipsoidal shape, thereby allowing the two hydrogen ligands to move apart.

Figure 8.7 Diborane, BaH. (a) Contour map of pb in the plane of the terminal hydrogens, (b) Contour map of pb in the plane of the bridging hydrogens, (c) Calculated geometry, (d) Experimental geometry. (e) Interatomic H-H distances, (f) Ionic model, (g) Resonance structures, (h) Protonated doublebond model, (i) VSEPR domain model showing the two three-center, two-electron bridging domains, (j) Hybrid orbital model.

Morris, E.R., Rees, D.A. and Robinson, G. (1980) Cation-specific aggregation of carrageenan helices Domain model of polymer gel structure. Journal of Molecular Biology, 138, 349-362. 

Meehan and Bond (23) on the other hand, have taken an opposite view, namely that k3I1(C) k3I(C), while k3II(T) k3I(T). Thus, in this view, the hydrolysis occurs at external binding sites, while covalent binding occurs at intercalation sites. Furthermore, they reject the common intermediate model (Equation 2) on the basis of their belief that the rates of reaction for tetraol formation and adduct formation and the ratio of the products should be the same in such a model. While these rates of reaction are the same and the product ratios are observed to be different, this is fully consistent for a set of parallel pseudo-first order reactions involving a common intermediate (29) as pointed out above. Thus, the data of Meehan and Bond does not demonstrate the validity of the two-domain model (23). 

Fig. 4. The molecular structure, determined by solution NMR (James et al., 1997), of Syrian hamster 90-231 (SHa90-231) prion with ball-and-stick representation of the HI domain (SHal09-122 MKHMAGAAAAGAW). Note that two short /(-chains (SI, S2) nearly stack in the hydrogen-bonding direction. If the palindromic polyalanine region was also in a /(-conformation, there would be a three-stranded /(-sheet. The structural difference between PrPc and PrPSc is in the 90-145 domain. [Model drawn using MOLSCRIPT (Kraulis, 1991)].

Equally, the action could be an abstraction of a dialog with a software system. In that case, because of the Golden Rule of 00 design (that we base the design on a domain model), we can use the same picture to denote objects (whether in a database or main memory) that the system uses to represent the real world. The interesting actions are then the interactions between the system and the rest of the world They update the system s knowledge of what is going on in the world, as represented in the attributes. 

Cast System Requirements in Terms of the Business Model See Pattern 15.7, Construct a System Behavior Spec. Particularly if the domain model has been clearly defined, system requirements can be discussed, understood, and decided far more precisely. 

Build Many Projects on the Same Model. A problem domain model is useful across more than a single project. But don t take this as a reason for perfecting a model before building your first system see Pattern 14.2, Make a Business Model. 

The resulting system relates better to the end users because it deals in the terms they are familiar with (assuming a reasonable problem domain model) and traces back to the... 

Consciously tradeoff performance, reuse, and flexibility optimization against entirely seamless design document a refinement clearly whenever you must stray significantly from a pristine domain model. 

Will the program code be object-oriented If it is, should we choose the classes directly from the domain model or based on design patterns or following the gut instincts of the project gum ... 

The principal relationship between packages is import. When you start a new piece of work, you almost never work from scratch there are at least all the primitive definitions (the numbers and so on). More usefully, you write an implementation against a corresponding specification package, and you write that specification by importing a corresponding domain model package. 

What should you reuse The executable Source code Interface specifications Problem domain models ... 

If you can componentize your problem domain descriptions themselves and reuse domain models, you greatly enhance your position to reuse interface specifications and implementations downstream. 

The frameworks approach also works at the level of problem domain models. The ideal approach is to formulate requirements themselves in a modular fashion by using model frameworks and plugging in the specifics for your problem implementing a code framework solution to the generic problem specification and specializing that implementation framework to construct your system. A typical system consists of numerous such code frameworks and demands careful use of component-based techniques—such as event protocols across frameworks—so that the parts work together correctly. 

The process of modeling and designing is recursive throughout business, component specification, and internal design. Similarly, specification and implementation activities are also recursive across the business or domain model, component spec, and internal design. 

Buildl. Build a domain model to capture terms, domain rales, business tasks. 

Assyl. Start with a domain model—optionally, a rudimentary system spec. 

Assy3. Define the retrieval mappings between type models of individual components and the domain model or system type models. 

There are still three conceptual levels the domain models (the outside, describing the environment in which the software will reside), the component specifications (the boundary, describing its externally desired behaviors), and the component implementation (the inside, describing its internal design). These three levels continue recursively Each subcomponent itself has a context (the collaboration with others that should realize the external spec), a specification, and its own implementation. 

Describe external behavior of target system using problem domain model... 

Domain or business models These describe the domain or business at hand, often independently of particular software solutions. It can include as-is and to-be models of the business. It is sometimes useful to analyze the as-is model, decide which aspects of it represent essential requirements, and abstract out an essential domain model that can then be refined to the envisaged to-be solution model. Domain models are reusable across multiple projects. 

The lightest-weight domain model is simply a problem statement, with a glossary of terms that are used in the statement. More-precise models use types, collaborations, and refinements to define static and dynamic business rules. 

Reuse Lemmas (1) If you reuse a specification, try a component-based approach implement against the interface and defer binding to the implementation. (2) Reuse of specifications leads to reuse of implementations. In particular, whenever you can implement standardized interfaces, whether domain-specific or for infrastructure services, you enable the reuse of all other implementations that follow those standards. (3) Successful reuse needs thorough interface specifications. (4) If you can componentize your problem domain descriptions themselves and reuse domain models, you greatly enhance your position to reuse interface specifications and implementations downstream. 

There is one method that is based on a time-domain model. It was developed at Shell Oil Company (C, R. Cutler and B. L. Kamaker, Dynamic Matrix Control A Computer Control Algorithm, paper presented at the 86th National AlChE Meeting, 1979) and is called dynamic matrix control (DMC). Several other methods have also been proposed ihat are quite similar. The basic idea is to use a time-domain step-response model of the process to calculate the future changes in the manipulated variable that will minimize some performance index. Much of the explanation of DMC given in this section follows the development presented by C. C. Yu in his Ph.D. thesis (Lehigh University, 1987). 

S. Tanev, D. Feng, V. Tzolov, and Z. J. Jakubczyk, Finite-difference time-domain modeling of complex integrated optics structures. Technical Digest, Integrated Photonics Research Conference Edition (Optical Society of America, Washington, 1999), pp. 202-204. 

---