Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Dissolver solution, composition

Now, we should ask ourselves about the properties of water in this continuum of behavior mapped with temperature and pressure coordinates. First, let us look at temperature influence. The viscosity of the liquid water and its dielectric constant both drop when the temperature is raised (19). The balance between hydrogen bonding and other interactions changes. The diffusion rates increase with temperature. These dependencies on temperature provide uS with an opportunity to tune the solvation properties of the liquid and change the relative solubilities of dissolved solutes without invoking a chemical composition change on the water. [Pg.154]

Small variations in solution composition may also affect the value of any critical velocity. In laboratory tests using recirculating artificial sea-water the presence of dissolved copper from copper alloy test-pieces has been shown to affect the value of the critical velocity for such materials . [Pg.996]

Anodic dissolution reactions of metals typically have rates that depend strongly on solution composition, particularly on the anion type and concentration (Kolotyrkin, 1959). The rates increase upon addition of surface-active anions. It follows that the first step in anodic metal dissolution reactions is that of adsorption of an anion and chemical bond formation with a metal atom. This bonding facilitates subsequent steps in which the metal atom (ion) is tom from the lattice and solvated. The adsorption step may be associated with simultaneous surface migration of the dissolving atom to a more favorable position (e.g., from position 3 to position 1 in Fig. 14.1 la), where the formation of adsorption and solvation bonds is facilitated. [Pg.299]

For a feed rate 2000 kg/h of solution, composition 30 per cent w/w MEK, determine the number of stages required to recover 95 per cent of the dissolved MEK using 700 kg/h TCE, with counter-current flow. [Pg.633]

The experimental procedure for conducting phase solubility analysis is rather simple it consists of mixing increasing amounts of sample with a fixed volume of solvent and then determining the mass of sample that has dissolved after each addition. It is not necessary to exceed the solubility limit of the analyte species, but attainment of this condition makes it easier to recognize trend within the plots. An experimental protocol for phase solubility analyses is available [39]. The data are most commonly plotted with the system composition (total mass of sample added per gram solvent) on the x axis, and the solution composition (mass of solute actually dissolved per gram of solvent) on the y axis. [Pg.334]

When a quantity of pure solid is totally dissolved in a liquid, a single phase is obtained, which consists of the two components. In this system, only one degree of freedom (which is the solute concentration) is possible, and that condition persists as the solute concentration varies from zero to saturation. This behavior is represented by the A-B segment of Fig. 5. When the data are plotted so as to illustrate the dependence of the solution composition on the system composition, one obtains a straight line (the A-B segment) with a slope of unity. Since the saturation limit is defined only with respect to a solid phase, if no undissolved solid is present, the system is undefined. [Pg.335]

Measurements very sensitive to solution composition, dissolved oxygen and capillary characteristics. Impurities in background electrolyte limit sensitivity. [Pg.248]

Irradiated UO2 is dissolved in nitric acid, resulting in a dissolver solution with the approximate composition listed in Table 12.7. This is treated by the Purex process. The main steps in the conventional Purex process are shown schematically in Fig. 12.5. All existing plants listed in Table 12.8 use some variation of the Purex process. Typically, the extractant composition (percentage TBP, diluent) and the extraction equipment (i.e., pulse columns, mixer-settlers, etc.), vary from plant to plant. However, the upper concentration limit is 30% TBP to prevent a phase reversal due to the increased density of the fully loaded solvent phase. [Pg.520]

Table 12.7 Composition of Dissolver Solution from Several Reactor Fuel Types... [Pg.523]

Different organic and inorganic buffers, such as ammonium acetate, ammonium formate, HEPES, Gly-Gly, and triethanolamine, were selected to study the response of biotin and fluorescein-biotin in MS and compared to phosphate buffer. Biotin and fluorescein-biotin were dissolved in the carrier solution compositions of buffer (10 mM pH 7.5)/methanol (50 50, v/v) at concentrations of 10 ng pl k Both infusion and 20 pl-loop injection experiments were performed with detection by MS in full-scan and SIM mode. Main optimization criteria are the maximum response of biotin and fluorescein-biotin with lowest interference of the carrier solution. HEPES, Gly-Gly, and triethanolamine give very high background response, which significantly hampers the detection of biotin and fluorescein-... [Pg.201]

In order to select a carrier solution composition which would provide an overall maximum response for MS detection, two modifiers were selected, acetonitrile and methanol, and two buffers, i.e. ammonium acetate (10 mmol pH 7.5) and ammonium formate (10 mmol L pH 7.5). Biotin and fluorescein-biotin were dissolved in various binding buffer-organic solvent mixtures ranging from 90 10 (v/v) to 50 50 (v/v) at two concentration levels (0.01 ng 1 ng pL ) and 20 pL were injected and analyzed by MS in full-scan and SIM mode. The maximum response was found with 50% methanol, which was about a factor 2x higher than for 10% methanol. Since the proteins can denaturate or protein-ligand complexes can dissociate at relatively low percentages of organic modifier in further experiments only 10% methanol is used in the carrier solution. [Pg.202]

The initial compositions of both the infiltrating water and the solid materials may change due to their interaction, which in turn may affect the solubility and the pathway of dissolution-precipitation processes with time. When a particular component of the dissolved solution reaches a concentration greater than its solubility, a precipitation process occurs. Table 2.1 includes the solubility of selected sedimentary minerals in pure water at 25°C and total pressure of 1 bar, as well as their dissolution reactions. All of the minerals listed in Table 2.1 dissolve, so that the products of the mineral dissolution reactions are dissolved species. Figure 2.2 shows the example of gypsum precipitation with its increasing concentration in a NaCl aqueous solution. [Pg.38]

Membrane Preparation. Dried cellulose diacetate is dissolved in acetone in the weight ratio of 1 to 3 or 4. Gaseous ammonia is directed at room temperature over the solution surface in a rotary evaporator, the ammonia being readily absorbed by the polymer solution. Optimal ammonia concentration is 5 to 6 wt-%, a typical casting solution composition is cellulose diacetate/acetone/ ammonia 18.8/75.2/6.0 (solvent-to-polymer ratio 4). Casting is at room temperature. The precipitation bath is maintained at pH 4 through controlled addition of hydrochloric acid to compensate for the alkaline intake. [Pg.196]

Each polysulfide can be considered to contain (n — 1) zero valent sulfur and contributes to S iggoived- The distribution of species and measured and modeled rate of polysulfide decomposition are investigated for a wide range of polysulfide solution compositions from 298 K to 358 K. At temperatures up to 358 K, polysulfide solutions are extremely stable under conditions of high polysulfide concentration and low KOH concentrations. Under these conditions, zerovalent sulfur dissolved in these solutions should be stable on the order of years. [Pg.260]

Betenekov et al. [39] used an isotopic tracer technique to show that, for then-range of solution compositions, the initial deposition involved adsorption of Cd(OH)2 on the glass substrate. At the beginning of the reaction, only Cd was observed to form on the substrate and this was interpreted to be due to Cd(OH)2, since any other insoluble Cd compounds that might be formed from the deposition solution (containing CdCl2, NaOH, NH4OH, and thiourea dissolved in water) were expected to contain either S or C. However, they concluded that the deposition proceeded, not by reaction between Cd(OH)2 and sulphide formed by decomposition of thiourea, but rather by decomposition of a Cd(OH)2-thiourea complex (see Sec. 3.3.3.1). [Pg.116]

As more salt is added, excess salt is present in the solid phase and the solution composition is invariant. Therefore, the pH is constant and the product of the cation and anion activities equals the solubility product, as deLned in Equation 15.5, in the absence of cation or anion from other sources including molecular complex forms (Amis, 1983). At this point, more salt will not dissolve, and the salt concentration represents the solubility of the drug in the speciLc salt form. To conLrm that the salt solubility has been reached, it should be veriLed (Anderson and Conradi, 1985) that the solid salt phase in equilibrium with the solution has not been contaminated with the uncharged form precipitate. [Pg.426]

Elemental Compositions of various Spent Fuels and Liquid Concentrations in a Dissolved Solution... [Pg.13]

Conte, P., and Piccolo, A. (1999). Conformational arrangement of dissolved humic substances. Influence of solution composition on association of humic molecules. Environ. Sci. Technol. 33(10), 1682-1690. [Pg.829]

The electrolytic cell was a 200-mL tail-form beaker with a bottom outlet as described elsewhere. The process was carried out at voltages of 40-50 V at room temperature and a voltage of 50 V produced an initial current of 15-30mA. Electrolysis over 1-3 hr dissolved approximately 100 mg of metal. In the case of metallocenes, the organometallic was extracted with hexane, the solvent removed, and the complex sublimed in vacuo at 80°C/13 Pa. In most cases solutions eventually turned brown. Complexes precipitated in each electrolytic process were collected, washed with ether, and then dried in vacuo or over P4O10. Some complexes obtained from different solution compositions are the following ... [Pg.269]

In general, to explain the observed cosolvent effects, the preferential adsorption phenomena have been invoked. Flowever few topics in the physical chemistry of polymers have evoked so many theories but so little consensus as preferential adsorption. When a polymer is dissolved in a binary solvent mixture, usually one of the solvents preferentially solvates the polymer. This solvent will then be found in a greater proportion in the proximities of the macromolecule with respect to the bulk solution composition. This variation of the solvent composition can cause interesting phenomena such as cosolvency as was discussed before, [11, 91, 92] non - cosolvency [93, 94], and some times variation of the unperturbed polymer dimensions [95,96]... [Pg.30]

Second, there are problems in using concentrations, because the true driving force for the adsorption reaction is chemical potential, which is related to activity. For the dissolved component this means that adsorption isotherms measured in one solution do not necessarily apply to other solutions a point commonly overlooked by geochemists, particularly with regard to organic compounds. Also, variation in solution composition can result in the introduction of other ions or compounds that have an affinity for the surface. These ions may severely alter the adsorption of the component of interest. [Pg.65]

A basic concept is that a given carbonate mineral will not dissolve in a solution that is supersaturated with respect to that mineral or precipitate from a solution undersaturated with respect to that mineral. If a solution is undersaturated with respect to all carbonate minerals, they may all dissolve with their relative dissolution rates determined by grain size, microstructure, and solution composition, among other factors. The idea that under universally undersaturated conditions mineral solubility may not simply control dissolution rates, even for grains of the same size, was confirmed by Walter and Morse (1985). They observed that relative dissolution rates in seawater could not be normalized directly to total surface areas, but rather depended strongly on microarchitecture (Figure 7.6). [Pg.291]

Solvent Extraction Experiments. Solvent extraction studies were done on two feed samples representing dissolved hydroxide cake (SSA) and evaporator supernate (SSB). SSA was prepared by dissolution of hydroxide cake with slow addition of concentrated HN03, adjustment of the final acidity to 0.5 N by addition of water and/or HN03, and clarification by filtration. To prepare SSB, some supernate liquid from the evaporator was titrated, acidity adjusted to 0.5 N by NaOH and water addition, then clarified by filtration. No appreciable solids were observed on the clarification filters for either solution. Compositions of these feeds are listed in Table III. [Pg.90]


See other pages where Dissolver solution, composition is mentioned: [Pg.127]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.381]    [Pg.620]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.576]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.581]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.379]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.551]    [Pg.192]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.311]    [Pg.391]    [Pg.574]    [Pg.357]   


SEARCH



Composite solutions

Dissolved solutes

Solution composition

Solutions dissolved solute

© 2024 chempedia.info