Flammability cone calorimeter test

Samples used for the tests used samples werelOOxlOO mm and thickness 5.5-6.5 mm, placed in an aluminum crucible vector perpendicular to the radiant heat flux of 50 kW/m. Cone calorimeter flammability test was performed in accordance with ISO 5660. 

The conveyor belt flammability investigations were carried out using a standard cone calorimeter. The testing of conveyor belt flammability using a cone calorimeter was to the standards, ISO 5660-1 [34] and ASTM E1354 [35]. 

The evaluation of the flammability properties of PMMA and its composites with AlOOH was done using a cone calorimeter (Fire Testing Technology). A 100 x 100 x 4 mm sheet was exposed to a radiant cone (35 kW.m ). The HRR was calculated from the oxygen consumption as measured with an oxygen analyzer. Table 12.1 gathers the parameters obtained in comparison with the pure PMMA sample. 

There is evidence to show that the particle size of the filler also plays a significant role in flammability resistance. For example, below a certain particle size (about 1-2 pm), in many tests, including oxygen index, aluminum hydroxide shows enhanced fire-retarding performance,34 which may be associated with the rate of filler decomposition and/or with the formation of a more stable ash. However, it has been found that the particle size effect is absent, or less evident, in the cone calorimeter test.35 Similarly, particle size reduction has been shown to enhance fire retardancy in magnesium hydroxide-filled PP in this case, samples were characterized by the UL94 test.36 This raises the question as to whether further reductions in particle size to the nanoscale will lead to an additional increase in flammability performance, and perhaps enable filler overall levels to be significantly reduced. This aspect is considered in a later section. 

Polyvinyl Chloride (PVC) In flexible PVC, the partial replacement of antimony oxide with the zinc borate cannot only display synergy in flammability test performance but also results in dramatic smoke reduction.56 This synergy can be more dramatic when used in conjunction with ATH or magnesium hydroxide (MDH) (Figures 9.4 through 9.6). A recent Cone Calorimeter study49 showed that, in flexible PVC, the partial replacement of antimony with the zinc borate could reduce both the HRR and carbon monoxide production drastically at a... 

In the work of Wilkie et al.,55,56 oligomers of styrene, vinylbenzyl chloride, and diphenyl vinyl-benzylphosphate and diphenyl vinylphenylphosphate (DPVPP) have been prepared and reacted with an amine and then ion-exchanged onto clay. The resulting modified DPVPP clays have been melted blended with polystyrene and the flammability was evaluated. XRD and TEM observations proved the existence of intercalated nanocomposite structures. Cone calorimeter tests have shown a substantial reduction in the PHRR of about 70% in comparison with pure PS. According to the authors, this reduction was higher than the maximum reduction usually obtained with PS nanocomposites. Other vinylphosphate modified clay nanocomposites were also elaborated. The reduction in PHRR was greater with higher phosphorus content than for DPVPP. Consequently, the reduction in PHRR seemed attributed to both the presence of the clay and to the presence of phosphorus. 

Higher irradiation levels give better reproducibility, more clearly defined ignition, and shorter measurement times, but correspond to more developed fires. Thus particularly for flame-retarded polymers, a smaller irradiation level often corresponds better to the fire protection goals addressed. Cone calorimeter results for the HRR at small irradiances correspond to flammability tests such as LOI and UL 94, if a reasonable set of materials are compared and the behavior is not dominated by dripping effects. Thus different considerations govern the choice of external heat flux.76 77... 

Subsequently, the ignition temperature and the HRC parameter can be determined and used to compare PCFC data with data from other test methods. The HRC is defined as the ratio of the heat release rate and the heating rate. The peak heat release rates determined in cone calorimeter experiments correlate well with peak HRC data from PCFC experiments. In terms of other tests, results from the LOI (ASTM D 2863) test method exhibit a reciprocal correlation with HRC values, while HRC can also be a rough indicator for UL 94 ratings. In approximate terms, it has been said that HRC results can classify materials into three ranges of material flammability, as follows ... 

For tests other than E-84, there have been some studies on the effects of fiber loading and fiber layup on composite flammability. This has primarily been work done by the U.S. Navy on the flammability of composites used in naval vessel flammability,19-20 or work by Kandola et al.10-21-22 on the effect of fiber type and content on polymer composites studied by cone calorimeter. More work is being conducted in studying the effects of fiber orientation and lay-up not on overall flammability performance, but flammability performance under structural load. This is the most important for aircraft, vehicles, and buildings where the composites are structural members. The concern here is... 

Cone calorimetry according to the ASTM E1354138 or ISO 5660139 standards are commonly used in the laboratory to screen flammability of materials by measuring heat release characteristics of the compound.116140 This device is similar to FPA but does not have the versatility of FPA. The cone calorimeter can determine the ignitability, heat release rates, effective heat of combustion, visible smoke, and C02 and CO development of cable materials. This test has been used extensively for wire and cable material evaluation. The microscale combustion calorimeter (MCC), also known as pyrolysis combustion flow calorimeter (PCFC), was recently introduced to the industry for screening heat release characteristics of FR materials.141142 This device only requires milligram quantities of test specimen to measure the heat release capacity (maximum heat release potential). Cone calorimetry and MCC have been used in product development for flammability screening of wire and cable compounds.118... 

No differences in flammability characteristics between the 0.1% Cu20-treated and untreated flexible polyurethane foam were observed. These characteristics were examined to assure that the positive effect on toxicity was not contradicted by negative effects on the flammability properties. The flammability characteristics examined were (1) ignitability in three systems (the NIST Cup Furnace Smoke Toxicity method, the Cone Calorimeter, and Lateral Ignition and Flame Spread Test (LIFT)), (2) heat release rates under small-scale (Cone Calorimeter) and medium-scale (furniture calorimeter) conditions, (3) heats of combustion under small-scale (Cone Calorimeter) and medium-scale (furniture calorimeter) conditions, (4) CO/CO2 ratios under small-scale (Cone Calorimeter) and medium-scale (furniture calorimeter) conditions, (5) smoke obscuration (Cone Calorimeter), and (6) rate of flame spread (LIFT). 

The NFPA 318 deals with the protection of clean rooms whereas the FMR 4910 and UL 2360 deal with the flammability of polymers for the clean rooms. In the FMR 4910 test standard, ASTM E2058 Fire Propagation Apparatus (FPA) [31] is used, whereas ASTM El354 Cone Calorimeter [36] is used in the UL 2360 test standard. Both test standards evaluate the fire propagation and smoke release behaviors of the polymers. Eor polymers for which fire propagation behavior cannot be defined clearly, both test standards use a large-scale parallel panel test [40, 63, 78]. Figures 11.12 and 11.13, discussed in an earlier section, illustrate the parallel panel test. 

Flammability tests include (a) UL94, (b) limiting oxygen index (LOI), and (c) cone calorimeter tests. LOI is used to obtain the limit of oxygen concentration that sustains combustion, whereas UL94 studies the ignition from a small flame and subsequently the... 

Flammability test results using a cone calorimeter are shown in Table 4.6 and Figure 4.2. 

---