Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Concentration titration and

Superficial chemical peels, including salicylic and glycolic acids, and Jessner s peels target the stratum corneum to the papillary dermis. These agents can be safely used to facilitate the resolution of PIH (Figs. 16.2,16.3,16.4 and 16.5). To assess for variability in response and limit further PIH, when possible, chemical peels should be initiated at the lower concentrations and titrated to higher concentrations if necessary to increase efficacy while minimizing side effects (see Darker Skin Section). [Pg.181]

Data collected for each run included acid analysis using inductively coupled plasma (ICF) to determine cation concentration and titration to determine H concentration. Filtering characteristics were determined using solid and filtrate yield rates, as well as back pressures during the filtration cycle. The filter cake was characterized by moisture content and composition. Solid samples were analyzed with scanning electron microscopy (SEM) to determine changes in particle shape and size under various process conditions, and X-ray diffraction (XRD) was used to determine the solids composition. [Pg.313]

No effect of TMPD on CO binding rates was detected by either procedure. The plot of binding rates vs. [Py] according to Equation 2 is unchanged by the presence of 1M TMPD. Taking an Fe(TPP)(Py)(CO) solution at either low (0.02M) or high (0.25M) pyridine concentration and titrating with TMPD up to about 1M also... [Pg.248]

As to the concentration of the titrating solution a high NaOH concentration affected the enzyme activity more seriously than a high substrate concentration. Thus, in order to have a high space-time yield it is better to work with a high substrate concentration and titrate with a moderately concentrated sodium hydroxide solution than vice versa. However, at pH 9 the enzyme still worked without problems at 33% substrate concentration using 3 M or 4 M sodium hydroxide solution (and even 9 M NaOH worked, however, with a considerably reduced enzyme activity). [Pg.391]

It is of interest to compare the titration curves for the weak acid with a strong base with the titration curve for a strong acid with a strong base. In Illustration 15.1-2 and here we have used equal amounts of acidic solutions of equal concentrations, and titrated both with the same sodium hydroxide solution. However, we see that the initial parts of the titration curve look somewhat different while the parts beyond neutrality are identical. In particular, the titration curve for the strong acid starts at a much lower pH than the titration curve for the weak acid. [Pg.838]

To assess for variability in response and limit further PIH, chemical peels shonld be started at the lower concentration and titrated up as tolerated and necessary. [Pg.146]

Andrews deration An important titration for the estimation of reducing agents. The reducing agent is dissolved In concentrated hydrochloric acid and titrated with potassium iodale(V) solution. A drop of carbon tetrachloride is added to the solution and the end point is indicated by the disappearance of the iodine colour from this layer. The reducing agent is oxidized and the iodate reduced to ICl, i.e. a 4-eiectron change. [Pg.34]

Cyanide is determined at concentrations greater than 1 ppm by making the sample alkaline with NaOH and titrating with a standard solution of AgN03, forming the soluble Ag(CN)2 complex. The end point is determined using p-dimethylaminobenzalrhodamine as a visual indicator, with the solution turning from yellow to a salmon color in the presence of excess Ag+. [Pg.327]

The concentration of Ch in a 100.0-mL sample of water drawn from a fresh water acquifer suffering from encroachment of sea water, was determined by titrating with 0.0516 M Hg(N03)2. The sample was acidified and titrated to the diphenylcarbazone end point, requiring 6.18 mb of the titrant. Report the concentration of Cb in parts per million. [Pg.329]

The fermentation-derived food-grade product is sold in 50, 80, and 88% concentrations the other grades are available in 50 and 88% concentrations. The food-grade product meets the Vood Chemicals Codex III and the pharmaceutical grade meets the FCC and the United States Pharmacopoeia XK specifications (7). Other lactic acid derivatives such as salts and esters are also available in weU-estabhshed product specifications. Standard analytical methods such as titration and Hquid chromatography can be used to determine lactic acid, and other gravimetric and specific tests are used to detect impurities for the product specifications. A standard titration method neutralizes the acid with sodium hydroxide and then back-titrates the acid. An older standard quantitative method for determination of lactic acid was based on oxidation by potassium permanganate to acetaldehyde, which is absorbed in sodium bisulfite and titrated iodometricaHy. [Pg.515]

Tin ores and concentrates can be brought into solution by fusing at red heat in a nickel cmcible with sodium carbonate and sodium peroxide, leaching in water, acidifying with hydrochloric acid, and digesting with nickel sheet. The solution is cooled in carbon dioxide, and titrated with a standard potassium iodate—iodide solution using starch as an indicator. [Pg.60]

The holistic thermodynamic approach based on material (charge, concentration and electron) balances is a firm and valuable tool for a choice of the best a priori conditions of chemical analyses performed in electrolytic systems. Such an approach has been already presented in a series of papers issued in recent years, see [1-4] and references cited therein. In this communication, the approach will be exemplified with electrolytic systems, with special emphasis put on the complex systems where all particular types (acid-base, redox, complexation and precipitation) of chemical equilibria occur in parallel and/or sequentially. All attainable physicochemical knowledge can be involved in calculations and none simplifying assumptions are needed. All analytical prescriptions can be followed. The approach enables all possible (from thermodynamic viewpoint) reactions to be included and all effects resulting from activation barrier(s) and incomplete set of equilibrium data presumed can be tested. The problems involved are presented on some examples of analytical systems considered lately, concerning potentiometric titrations in complex titrand + titrant systems. All calculations were done with use of iterative computer programs MATLAB and DELPHI. [Pg.28]

To find the best a priori conditions of analysis, the equilibrium analysis, based on material balances and all physicochemical knowledge involved with an electrolytic system, has been done with use of iterative computer programs. The effects resulting from (a) a buffer chosen, (b) its concentration and (c) complexing properties, (d) pH value established were considered in simulated and experimental titrations. Further effects tested were tolerances in (e) volumes of titrants added in aliquots, (f) pre-assumed pH values on precision and accuracy of concentration measured from intersection of two segments obtained in such titrations. [Pg.83]

To the same solution add a few drops of phenol phthalein, and titrate it against N/10 NaOH until a pink colour appears, which will indicate the total acidity of the bath. This is approximately 35 to 37 for a concentration of 5% for a hot process and 60 to 64 for a concentration of 10% for a cold process. Obtain the standard total acidity of the hot or cold process chemicals from the manufacturer. [Pg.403]

One 1-ml aliquot is added to 1.0 ml of freshly-distilled 1,2-dibromo-ethane (bp 132°C) in an oven-dried flask which contains a static atmosphere of nitrogen or argon. After the resulting solution has been allowed to stand at 25°C for 5 min, it Is diluted with 10 rat of water and titrated for base content (residual base) to a phenolphthalein endpoint with standard 0.100 M hydrochloric acid. The second 1-mL aliquot is added cautiously to 10 ml of water and then titrated for base content (total base) to a phenol phthalein endpoint with standard aqueous 0.100 M hydrochloric acid. The methyllithium concentration is the difference between the total base and residual base concentrations.2 Alternatively, the methynithiura concentration may be determined by titration with a standard solution of sec-butyl alcohol employing 2,2 -bipyridyl as an indicator. [Pg.105]

The EPA defines corrosivity in terms of pH (i.e., wastes with pH <2 or >2.5) or in terms of ability to corrode steel (SAE 20) at a rate of >6.35 mm (0.250 in.) per year at a temperature of 55 C (13°F). This discussion will address corrosivity as it applies to acids and caustics. Acids are compounds that yield H ions (actually HjO ions) when dissolved in water. Common industrial acids include acetic, nitric, hydrochloric, and sulfuric acids. The terms concentrated and dilute refer to the concentrations in solution. Mixing a concentrated acid with enough water will produce a dilute acid. For example, a bottle of concentrated HCl direct from the manufacturer is approximately 12 N in HCl, while a solution of HCl used in a titration may be only 0.5 N. The latter is a dilute acid solution. [Pg.164]

Titrimetric analysis is a classical method for generating concentration-time data, especially in second-order reactions. We illustrate with data on the acetylation of isopropanol (reactant B) by acetic anhydride (reactant A), catalyzed by A-methyl-imidazole. The kinetics were followed by hydrolyzing 5.0-ml samples at known times and titrating with standard base. A blank is carried out with the reagents but no alcohol. The reaction is... [Pg.32]

The phosphorodichloridate was hydrolyzed by adding to a stirred solution of sodium carbonate (253 grams) in water (2.9 liters). After 1 hour the solution was cooled and acidified with a solution of concentrated sulfuric acid (30 ml) in water (150 ml) and then extracted with a mixture of tetrahydrofuran and chloroform (2.3/1 3 x 1 liter). The tetrahydro-furan/chloroform liquors were bulked and evaporated to dryness to give a light brown oil. This was dissolved in water (1 liter) and titrated with 2N sodium hydroxide solution to a pH of 4.05 (volume required 930 ml). The aqueous solution was clarified by filtration through kieselguhr and then evaporated under reduced pressure to a syrup (737 grams). [Pg.1536]

A second major use of sulfuric acid of commerce is in reactions with bases. In laboratory use it is diluted to a much lower concentration and can be used as a standard acid. A typical problem would be the titration of a base solution of unknown concentration using a sulfuric acid solution of known concentration. For example, What is the concentration of a sodium hydroxide solution if 25.43 ml of the NaOH solution just reacts with 18.51 ml of 0.1250 M HiSOt (to produce a neutral solution) ... [Pg.230]

A. Direct titration. The solution containing the metal ion to be determined is buffered to the desired pH (e.g. to PH = 10 with NH4-aq. NH3) and titrated directly with the standard EDTA solution. It may be necessary to prevent precipitation of the hydroxide of the metal (or a basic salt) by the addition of some auxiliary complexing agent, such as tartrate or citrate or triethanolamine. At the equivalence point the magnitude of the concentration of the metal ion being determined decreases abruptly. This is generally determined by the change in colour of a metal indicator or by amperometric, spectrophotometric, or potentiometric methods. [Pg.311]

Treat an aqueous suspension of about 0.072g (accurately weighed) silver chloride with a mixture of 10 mL of concentrated ammonia solution and 10 mL of 1M ammonium chloride solution, then add about 0.2 g of potassium cyanonickelate and warm gently. Dilute to 100 mL with de-ionised water, add 50 mg of the indicator mixture and titrate with standard (0.01 M) EDTA solution, adding the reagent dropwise in the neighbourhood of the end point, until the colour changes from yellow to violet. [Pg.328]

Procedure. Place 10 mL of the solution containing the two metals (the concentration of neither of which should exceed 0.01 M) in a 600mL beaker fitted with a magnetic stirrer, and dilute to 100 mL with de-ionised water. Add 20 mL of standard (approx. 0.01 M) EDTA solution and add hexamine to adjust the pH to 5-6. Then add a few drops of the indicator solution (0.5 g xylenol orange dissolved in 100 mL of water) and titrate the excess EDTA with a standard lead nitrate solution (0.01 M), i.e. to the formation of a red-violet colour. [Pg.335]

Pipette 25.0 mL of the bromide ion solution (0.01-0.02M) into a 400 mL beaker, add excess of dilute silver nitrate solution, filter off the precipitated silver bromide on a sintered glass filtering crucible, and wash it with cold water. Dissolve the precipitate in a warm solution prepared from 15 mL of concentrated ammonia solution, 15 mL of 1M ammonium chloride, and 0.3 g of potassium tetracyanonickelate. Dilute to 100-200 mL, add three drops of murexide indicator, and titrate with standard EDTA (0.01 M) (slowly near the end point) until the colour changes from yellow to violet. [Pg.339]

Notes. (1) For elementary students, it is sufficient to weigh out accurately about 1.25 g of arsenic(III) oxide, dissolve this in 50 mL of a cool 20 per cent solution of sodium hydroxide, and make up to 250 mL in a graduated flask. Shake well. Measure 25.0 mL of this solution by means of a burette and not with a pipette (caution — the solution is highly poisonous) into a 500 mL conical flask, add 100 mL water, 10 mL pure concentrated hydrochloric acid, one drop potassium iodide solution, and titrate with the permanganate solution to the first permanent pink colour as detailed above. Repeat with two other 25 mL portions of the solution. Successive titrations should agree within 0.1 mL. [Pg.371]

Weak acid with a strong base. In the titration of a weak acid with a strong base, the shape of the curve will depend upon the concentration and the dissociation constant Ka of the acid. Thus in the neutralisation of acetic acid (Ka— 1.8 x 10-5) with sodium hydroxide solution, the salt (sodium acetate) which is formed during the first part of the titration tends to repress the ionisation of the acetic acid still present so that its conductance decreases. The rising salt concentration will, however, tend to produce an increase in conductance. In consequence of these opposing influences the titration curves may have minima, the position of which will depend upon the concentration and upon the strength of the weak acid. As the titration proceeds, a somewhat indefinite break will occur at the end point, and the graph will become linear after all the acid has been neutralised. Some curves for acetic acid-sodium hydroxide titrations are shown in Fig. 13.2(h) clearly it is not possible to fix an accurate end point. [Pg.526]

A subsequent investigation using spectrophotometric and titration techniques indicated that the reaction order in carboxylic acid was approximately three and that first-order rate coefficients were, in fact, independent of the initial concentration of mercury compound606. The reaction mechanism was proposed as... [Pg.279]

A fresh sample of this 40% peracetic acid contains about 1.54 equivalents, or 0.77 mole, of peroxide per 100 ml. of solution, corresponding to 1.34 equivalents per 100 g. The concentration can be determined by treating the peroxide solution with potassium iodide and titrating the liberated iodine with standard sodium thiosulfate. The concentration of peroxide in peracetic acid decreases somewhat on long standing and should be checked before the peracetic acid is used. The yield of diacetate is lowered if the concentration of the peroxide is less than 1.0 equivalent per 100 g. of peracetic acid. The total amount of peroxide used should be 2.4 moles, or 4.8 equivalents, for each mole of iodo-benzene. [Pg.63]

Baviere et al. [41] determined the adsorption of C18 AOS onto kaolinite by agitating tubes containing 2 g of kaolinite per 10 g of surfactant solution for 4 h in a thermostat. Solids were separated from the liquid phase by centrifugation and the supernatant liquid titrated for sulfonate. The amount of AOS adsorbed is the difference between initial solution concentration and supernatant solution concentration at equilibrium. [Pg.405]

Alternatively, the 3- and 4-hydroxy sulfonates may be converted to the corresponding sultones by treatment with a strong mineral acid. An ether extract concentrates the organic components, sultones, and alkenesulfonic acid, which can be weighed and titrated potentiometrically with sodium hydroxide. 2-Hydroxyalkanesulfonate will not dehydrate to the sultone under these conditions and is not measured. [Pg.435]


See other pages where Concentration titration and is mentioned: [Pg.112]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.112]    [Pg.179]    [Pg.1167]    [Pg.362]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.464]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.305]    [Pg.337]    [Pg.340]    [Pg.341]    [Pg.355]    [Pg.394]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.573]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.560]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.471]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.241 ]




SEARCH



Concentration Conditions That Must Be Respected to Obtain Satisfactory Titrations of Strong Acids and Bases

Experiment 8 Determination of Concentration by Oxidation-Reduction Titration and an Actual Student Lab Write-Up

© 2024 chempedia.info