Surfactants combined

The predicted phase distribution of DDT mass among the soil, micelles, and water are presented in Figure 11.5 as a function of aqueous Tween 80 concentration. The initial mass of the soil was assumed to be lOng/g. In the absence of Tween 80, 99.4% of the total mass of DDT was associated with the solid phase, and only 5% of the mass was in the aqueous phase. As the surfactant concentration increased, the micellar solubilization became more dominant. While DDT mass in the micellar phase was increased, DDT associated with the soil decreased drastically. For example, in the presence of 10,000 mg/1 of Tween 80,74.1% of DDT was associated with surfactant micelles, and only 25.2% was associated with the solid phase. The substantial increase of HOCs in the aqueous phase (within micelles) allows combining surfactants with various remediation technologies including electrokinetics. 

For developing the desired formulation of paints, inks, and polishes, generally a combination of nonionic and ionic surfactants is used to address the synergistic effect of combined surfactants. The characterization of the surfactants as per the abovementioned characteristic is essential for developing suitable formulations. 

A combination of surfactants gives slower drainage and improved foam stability. For example, mixtures of anionic and nonionic surfactants or anionic surfactant and long-chain alcohol produce much more stable films than the single components. This could be attributed to several factors. For example, the addition of a nonionic to an anionic surfactant reduces the c.m.c. of the anionic surfactant. The mixture can also produce a lower surface tension than the individual components. The combined surfactant system also has a high surface elasticity and viscosity when compared with the single components. 

Emulsions which combine surfactant and colloid protection will display properties that... 

The type of behavior shown by the ethanol-water system reaches an extreme in the case of higher-molecular-weight solutes of the polar-nonpolar type, such as, soaps and detergents [91]. As illustrated in Fig. Ul-9e, the decrease in surface tension now takes place at very low concentrations sometimes showing a point of abrupt change in slope in a y/C plot [92]. The surface tension becomes essentially constant beyond a certain concentration identified with micelle formation (see Section XIII-5). The lines in Fig. III-9e are fits to Eq. III-57. The authors combined this analysis with the Gibbs equation (Section III-SB) to obtain the surface excess of surfactant and an alcohol cosurfactant. 

A 1.5% by weight aqueous surfactant solution has a surface tension of 53.8 dyn/cm (or mN/m) at 20°C. (a) Calculate a, the area of surface containing one molecule. State any assumptions that must be made to make the calculation from the preceding data, (b) The additional information is now supplied that a 1.7% solution has a surface tension of 53.6 dyn/cm. If the surface-adsorbed film obeys the equation of state ir(o - 00) = kT, calculate from the combined data a value of 00, the actual area of a molecule. 

Ruch and Bartell [84], studying the aqueous decylamine-platinum system, combined direct estimates of the adsorption at the platinum-solution interface with contact angle data and the Young equation to determine a solid-vapor interfacial energy change of up to 40 ergs/cm due to decylamine adsorption. Healy (85) discusses an adsorption model for the contact angle in surfactant solutions and these aspects are discussed further in Ref. 86. 

Surface active electrolytes produce charged micelles whose effective charge can be measured by electrophoretic mobility [117,156]. The net charge is lower than the degree of aggregation, however, since some of the counterions remain associated with the micelle, presumably as part of a Stem layer (see Section V-3) [157]. Combination of self-diffusion with electrophoretic mobility measurements indicates that a typical micelle of a univalent surfactant contains about 1(X) monomer units and carries a net charge of 50-70. Additional colloidal characterization techniques are applicable to micelles such as ultrafiltration [158]. 

Cationic surfactants may be used [94] and the effect of salinity and valence of electrolyte on charged systems has been investigated [95-98]. The phospholipid lecithin can also produce microemulsions when combined with an alcohol cosolvent [99]. Microemulsions formed with a double-tailed surfactant such as Aerosol OT (AOT) do not require a cosurfactant for stability (see, for instance. Refs. 100, 101). Morphological hysteresis has been observed in the inversion process and the formation of stable mixtures of microemulsion indicated [102]. 

In all surfactant solutions 5.2 can be expected to prefer the nonpolar micellar environment over the aqueous phase. Consequently, those surfactant/dienophile combinations where the dienophile resides primarily in the aqueous phase show inhibition. This is the case for 5.If and S.lg in C12E7 solution and for S.lg in CTAB solution. On the other hand, when diene, dienophile and copper ion simultaneously bind to the micelle, as is the case for Cu(DS)2 solutions with all three dienophiles, efficient micellar catalysis is observed. An intermediate situation exists for 5.1c in CTAB or C12E7 solutions and particularly for 5.If in CTAB solution. Now the dienophile binds to the micelle and is slid elded from the copper ions that apparently prefer the aqueous phase. Tliis results in an overall retardation, despite the possible locally increased concentration of 5.2 in the micelle. 

Microemulsion Polymerization. Polyacrylamide microemulsions are low viscosity, non settling, clear, thermodynamically stable water-in-od emulsions with particle sizes less than about 100 nm (98—100). They were developed to try to overcome the inherent settling problems of the larger particle size, conventional inverse emulsion polyacrylamides. To achieve the smaller microemulsion particle size, increased surfactant levels are required, making this system more expensive than inverse emulsions. Acrylamide microemulsions form spontaneously when the correct combinations and types of oils, surfactants, and aqueous monomer solutions are combined. Consequendy, no homogenization is required. Polymerization of acrylamide microemulsions is conducted similarly to conventional acrylamide inverse emulsions. To date, polyacrylamide microemulsions have not been commercialized, although work has continued in an effort to exploit the unique features of this technology (100). 

Emulsion Adhesives. The most widely used emulsion-based adhesive is that based upon poly(vinyl acetate)—poly(vinyl alcohol) copolymers formed by free-radical polymerization in an emulsion system. Poly(vinyl alcohol) is typically formed by hydrolysis of the poly(vinyl acetate). The properties of the emulsion are derived from the polymer employed in the polymerization as weU as from the system used to emulsify the polymer in water. The emulsion is stabilized by a combination of a surfactant plus a coUoid protection system. The protective coUoids are similar to those used paint (qv) to stabilize latex. For poly(vinyl acetate), the protective coUoids are isolated from natural gums and ceUulosic resins (carboxymethylceUulose or hydroxyethjdceUulose). The hydroHzed polymer may also be used. The physical properties of the poly(vinyl acetate) polymer can be modified by changing the co-monomer used in the polymerization. Any material which is free-radically active and participates in an emulsion polymerization can be employed. Plasticizers (qv), tackifiers, viscosity modifiers, solvents (added to coalesce the emulsion particles), fillers, humectants, and other materials are often added to the adhesive to meet specifications for the intended appHcation. Because the presence of foam in the bond line could decrease performance of the adhesion joint, agents that control the amount of air entrapped in an adhesive bond must be added. Biocides are also necessary many of the materials that are used to stabilize poly(vinyl acetate) emulsions are natural products. Poly(vinyl acetate) adhesives known as "white glue" or "carpenter s glue" are available under a number of different trade names. AppHcations are found mosdy in the area of adhesion to paper and wood (see Vinyl polymers). 

A.lkyl Sulfosuccinate Half Asters. These detergents are prepared by reaction of maleic anhydride and a primary fatty alcohol, followed by sulfonation with sodium bisulfite. A typical member of this group is disodium lauryl sulfosucciaate [26838-05-1]. Although not known as effective foamers, these surfactants can boost foams and act as stabilizers when used ia combination with other anionic surfactants. In combination with alkyl sulfates, they are said to reduce the irritation effects of the latter (6). 

Fatty Held—Peptide Condensates. These proteia detergents are reaction products of fatty acid chlorides and hydrolyzed proteias. They are used ia shampoos because of their mildness on skin, hair, and to eyes when used alone or ia combination with alkyl surfactants (8). 

Baby Shampoos. These shampoos, specifically marketed for small children, feature a non-eye stinging quaHty. The majority of the products in this category are based on an amphoteric detergent system a system combining the use of an imidazoline amphoteric with an ethoxylated nonionic surfactant has been successfiiUy marketed (15,16). The sulfosuccinates also have been suggested for baby shampoo preparation because of thek mildness... 

Three generations of latices as characterized by the type of surfactant used in manufacture have been defined (53). The first generation includes latices made with conventional (/) anionic surfactants like fatty acid soaps, alkyl carboxylates, alkyl sulfates, and alkyl sulfonates (54) (2) nonionic surfactants like poly(ethylene oxide) or poly(vinyl alcohol) used to improve freeze—thaw and shear stabiUty and (J) cationic surfactants like amines, nitriles, and other nitrogen bases, rarely used because of incompatibiUty problems. Portiand cement latex modifiers are one example where cationic surfactants are used. Anionic surfactants yield smaller particles than nonionic surfactants (55). Often a combination of anionic surfactants or anionic and nonionic surfactants are used to provide improved stabiUty. The stabilizing abiUty of anionic fatty acid soaps diminishes at lower pH as the soaps revert to their acids. First-generation latices also suffer from the presence of soap on the polymer particles at the end of the polymerization. Steam and vacuum stripping methods are often used to remove the soap and unreacted monomer from the final product (56). 

FiaaHy, a-olefias find their way iato the surfactant and disiafectant market through conversion, first to alkyl dimethyl amine, then to benzyl chloride quats (BAUMAC) and amine oxides. The former are used broadly as disiafectants, often ia combination with cleaning products. The latter is a direct active ia consumer and iadustrial cleaning products. 

The focus of more recent work has been the use of relatively low concentrations of additives in other oil recovery processes. Of particular interest is the use of surfactants (qv) as CO2 (4) and steam mobiUty control agents (foam). Combinations of older EOR processes such as surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding and alkaline—surfactant—polymer flooding show promise of improved cost effectiveness. 

Surfactants evaluated in surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding include internal olefin sulfonates (259,261), linear alkyl xylene sulfonates (262), petroleum sulfonates (262), alcohol ethoxysulfates (258,261,263), and alcohol ethoxylates/anionic surfactants (257). Water-thickening polymers, either xanthan or polyacrylamide, can reduce injected fluid mobiHty in alkaline flooding (264) and surfactant-enhanced alkaline flooding (259,263). The combined use of alkah, surfactant, and water-thickening polymer has been termed the alkaH—surfactant—polymer (ASP) process. Cross-linked polymers have been used to increase volumetric sweep efficiency of surfactant—polymer—alkaline agent formulations (265). 

---