Cloud point, nonionic surfactants

Performance Indices Quality Factors Optimum E1LB Critical micelle concentration (CMC) Soil solubilization capacity Krafft point (ionic surfactants only) Cloud point (nonionic surfactants only) Viscosity Calcium binding capacity Surface tension reduction at CMC Dissolution time Material and/or structural attributes... 

Krafft point (for ionic surfactants) and cloud point (for nonionic surfactants) are both a limit to surfactant solubility. The solubility of ionic surfactants decreases significantly below the Krafft point, since its concentration falls below the CMC and individual surfactant molecules cannot form micelles. Therefore, the Krafft point of an ionic surfactant must be below the desired wash temperature for maximum soil removal. In contrast, the solubility of some nonionic surfactants decreases with increasing temperature. Above the cloud point, the surfactant becomes insoluble. Thus, the cloud point of a nonionic surfactant should be 15-30°C above the intended wash temperature [8],... 

In addition to low-cloud point nonionics, the patent literature describes the use of some additional surfactants in ADDs. The use of a mixture of high- and low-cloud point surfactants is reported to provide benefit in terms of greasy soil cleaning. Low-cloud point nonionics are also used in combination with charged surfactants (anionic, zwitterionic) for removal of greasy soil such as lipstick. Examples include amine oxide, alkyl carboxy ethoxylate, or sulfobetaine. For automatic dishwashing tablets, the use of disulfonated anionics such as Dowfax 3B-2 or 2A-1 manufactured by Dow Chemicals has been reported to decrease the solubility rate and the friability percentage loss. ... 

Nonionic surfactants do not exhibit Krafft points. Instead, the solubility of nonionic surfactants decreases with increasing temperature, and these surfactants may begin to lose their surface active properties above a transition temperature referred to as the cloud point. This occurs because above the cloud point a surfactant rich phase of swollen micelles separates, and the transition is usually accompanied by a marked increase in dispersion turbidity. 

Like other EO/PO nonionics, they exhibit an inverse %ater-solubility behavior versus temperature (cloud point). Silicone surfactants show excellent wetting capacity on low-energy surfaces. Also, their diluted solutions can considerably decrease the surface tension to below 20 dyn/cm. 

Many solutions of common nonionic surfactants and water separate into two phases when heated above a certain temperature (the cloud point), and some investigators call the phase of greater surfactant concentration, a microemulsion. Thus, there is not even universal agreement that a microemulsion must contain oil. 

In most cases, these active defoaming components are insoluble in the defoamer formulation as weU as in the foaming media, but there are cases which function by the inverted cloud-point mechanism (3). These products are soluble at low temperature and precipitate when the temperature is raised. When precipitated, these defoamer—surfactants function as defoamers when dissolved, they may act as foam stabilizers. Examples of this type are the block polymers of poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) and other low HLB (hydrophilic—lipophilic balance) nonionic surfactants. 

Recent publications indicate the cloud-point extraction by phases of nonionic surfactant as an effective procedure for preconcentrating and separation of metal ions, organic pollutants and biologically active compounds. The effectiveness of the cloud-point extraction is due to its high selectivity and the possibility to obtain high coefficients of absolute preconcentrating while analyzing small volumes of the sample. Besides, the cloud-point extraction with non-ionic surfactants insures the low-cost, simple and accurate analytic procedures. 

Cloud Points The influence of added NaCl on the observed cloud points of 1% W/V solutions of the four nonionic surfactants under observation are given in Figure 1. Approximately linear correlations were observed as the aqueous NaCl level was increased, with negative coefficients recorded between 0.22 - 0.3 K.g "1dm3. Higher loadings of surfactant were found to increase the cloud point. It was observed also that the inclusion of small quantities of oils to surfactant solutions could either elevate or depress the cloud point. The significance of this fact will be developed later. 

When scouring synthetic fibres that are to be dyed with disperse dyes, nonionic scouring agents are best avoided unless they are formulated to have a high cloud point and are known not to adversely affect the dispersion properties of the dyes. Conversely, when scouring acrylic fibres, anionic surfactants should be avoided [156] because they are liable to interfere with the subsequent application of basic dyes. These fibres are usually scoured with an ethoxylated alcohol, either alone or with a mild alkali such as sodium carbonate or a phosphate. 

Surprisingly, other investigators were unable to confirm the adverse effect of nonionic surfactants of low cloud point in the high-temperature dyeing of polyester, even in the presence of electrolytes [111]. This was probably because of the rather low concentrations used. Adducts containing a C18-C2o hydrophobe and a decaoxyethylene hydrophile, as well... 

The effect characteristic of a multi-chain hydrophobe, that is, increase in the cmc and simultaneous decrease in the cloud point, appears to be inconsistent with the well-known HLB concept in surfactants. Tanford has pointed out that based on geometric considerations of micellar shape and size, amphiphilic molecules having a double-chain hydrophobe tend to form a bilayer micelle more highly packed rather than those of single-chain types ( ). In fact, a higher homologue of a,a -dialkylglyceryl polyoxyethylene monoether has been found to form a stable vesicle or lamellar micelle (9 ). Probably, the multi-chain type nonionics listed in... 

The most important advantage of cloud point extraction is that only small amounts of nonionic or zwitterionic surfactants are required and consequently the procedure is less costly and more environmentally benign than other conventional extraction techniques such as liquid-liquid extraction and solid liquid extraction [107,108]. Moreover, CPE offers the possibility of combining extraction and preconcentration in one step. 

Cloud point extraction of metal ions. The use of cloud point extraction as a separation technique was first introduced by Watanabe for the extraction of metal ions forming sparingly water soluble complexes [109], Since then, the technique has been applied successfully to the extraction of metal chelates for spectrophotometric, atomic absorption, or flow injection analysis of trace metals in a variety of samples [105-107,110]. Other metal complexes such as AUCI4 or thiocyanato-metal complexes can be extracted directly using nonionic surfactants such as polyoxyethylene... 

Many different types of interaction can induce reversible phase transitions. For instance, weak flocculation has been observed in emulsions stabilized by nonionic surfactants by increasing the temperature. It is well known that many nonionic surfactants dissolved in water undergo aphase separation above a critical temperature, an initially homogeneous surfactant solution separates into two micellar phases of different composition. This demixtion is generally termed as cloud point transition. Identically, oil droplets covered by the same surfactants molecules become attractive within the same temperature range and undergo a reversible fluid-solid phase separation [9]. 

FIGURE 3.8 Solubility of a nonionic surfactant in water (cloud point CP) (schematic) dependent on temperature. 

Carrying out an emulsion polymerization requires an awareness of the krafft point of an ionic surfactant and the cloud point of a nonionic surfactant. Micelles are formed only at temperatures above the Krafft point of an ionic surfactant. For a nonionic surfactant, micelles are formed only at temperatures below the cloud point. Emulsion polymerization is carried out below the cloud temperature of a nonionic surfactant and above the Krafft temperature of an ionic surfactant. 

Chen [8] studied mixtures of the pure surfactants Ci2(EO)4 and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) at 30 °C. At this temperature the former is a liquid which does not dissolve in water (see Fig. 3), and the latter is a solid. The SDS was doubly recrystallized from ethanol to remove n-dodecanol and other impurities. The solubility of SDS in pure Ci2(EO)4 at 30 °C was found to be approximately 9 wt. %. When small drops of an 8 wt. % mixture were injected into water at 30 °C, complete dissolution was observed, the time required being a linear function of the square root of initial drop radius. For instance, a drop having an initial radius of 70 (xm required approximately 100 s to dissolve, significantly more than the 16 s cited above for a slightly larger drop of pure Ci2(EO)6. Behavior was similar to that of nonionic mixtures below their cloud points discussed previously in that most of the drop dissolved rapidly, but the final small volume dissolved rather slowly with some observable emulsification. 

Bai [2] performed similar drop dissolution experiments with sodium oleate (NaOl) and Ci2(EO)4. For drops initially containing 7 and lOwt. % NaOl (particle size < 38 jim) the behavior was similar to that described above for drops having 8 wt. % SDS. However for drops with 15 and 17 wt. % NaOl dissolution was faster—comparable to that of the pure nonionics—and neither a surfactant-rich liquid immiscible with water nor emulsification was seen. Instead a concentrated liquid crystalline phase transformed directly into a micellar solution, as seen for the pure nonionics and nonionic mixtures well below their cloud points. 

The explanation for this behavior is similar to that given in the preceding section for nonionic surfactant mixtures. Adding a hydrophihc anionic surfactant raises the temperature at the cloud point and other phase transitions above those for pure Ci2(EO)4. If the amount of anionic added exceeds only slightly that needed for complete solubility, the final stages of the dissolution process are slow because preferential dissolution of the anionic causes the remaining drop to rise above its cloud point and nucleate small droplets of surfactant-rich liquid. But if the amount added is sufficiently large, drop composition remains below the cloud point in spite of preferential dissolution, with the result that dissolution is fast as with pure nonionic surfactants below their cloud points. 

Aqueous micellar solutions of many nonionic surfactants, with an increase in temperature, become turbid over a narrow temperature range, which is referred to as their cloud-point [17,277]. Above the cloud-point temperature, such solutions separate into two isotropic phases. Cloud-point extraction (CPE) is also referred to as a particular case of ATPE [278,279] and more specifically as aqueous micellar two-phase systems [10,277]. Very recently, in an extensive review, Quina and Hinze [280] have discussed in detail the emergence of CPE as an environmentally benign separation process, highlighting the basic features, experimental protocols, recent applications, and future trends in this area. 

In order to define a ionic/nonionic surfactant solution with high salinity/hardness tolerance, the following criterion should be followed. The mixed micelle should have as large of a negative deviation from ideality as possible. Surfactant mixture characteristics which result in this have already been discussed. The nonionic surfactant should have a high cloud point. Otherwise the amount of nonionic surfactant which can be added to the system is limited to low levels before phase separation occurs. If possible, a mixed ionic surfactant should be used for reasons Just discussed. There is no such benefit to using mixed nonionic surfactants, although this is not necessarily detrimental either. 

---