Civil action

It is not uncommon for civil actions to be brought against law enforcement personnel who have come into contact with individuals under the influence of PCP. Helen A. Burns vs. City and County of Honolulu et al. represents an issue that is being brought before the courts with increasing frequency. 

If these suggested recourses are not available, or if the counselor is not a member of or licensed by a professional organization, then legal recourse may be appropriate. If a criminal act has been committed, you may wish to contact law enforcement officials. If a law has not been broken, but you feel your rights have been violated, then you may wish to seek an attorney for civil action, such as malpractice. 

The impacts of TSCA, such as those on two specific exemplary industries, surface coating polymers and metal-cutting fluids, by S.Oslosky and H.Fribush, respectively, are implied but actually not explicit within TSCA. Consider the required assessment of risks, the need for test-data describing effects on health and the environment, aside from plant inspections, subpoenas, prohibited acts, penalties for prohibited acts, enforcement and seizure, judicial review, citizens civil actions and petitions, and employee protection provisions in the Act. Thus, it s inevitable that the alert manufacturer will adjust his product research, development and selection processes to identify and use substances with reduced risk to health and the environment wherever possible. As structure-(biological)-activity relationships become more reliable, the alert... 

Environmental impact is part of a facility s risk tolerance criteria. First, there is the direct cost of clean-up, monitoring costs, and environmental costs. There could be potential fines from local, state, or federal authorities. Finally, there may be potential civil actions that could result in millions of dollars of damage. 

Watson Pharm., Inc. v. Henney, Civil Action No. 00-3516 (D. Md. Jan. 17, 2001) (dismissing suit against the FDA seeking delisting because the FDA need not review Orange Book listings) ... 

Docket Sheet for Abbott Labs. v. Geneva Pharma., Civil Action No. 96-1762 (N.D. Ill.)(indicating dismissal of Civil Action 96-1762 in May 1996) FDA s Approval Letter to Geneva Pharma, for ANDA No. 74-823 (indicating dismissal of Civil Action No. 96-1762 on 615 patent), posted at ... 

The basic patent coverage for use of xylose isomerase to convert glucose to fructose was lost in 1975 as the result of a civil action suit between CPC International and Standard Brands. Tins enabled development of alternate processes. By 1978. the estimated US production volume was 3.5 x 109 lb and consisted mostly ot syrups containing 42% D-fructose sold at a 71 % solids level (Antrim et al.). The introduction of large scale liquid chromatographic purification of the fructose enabled production of a 55% fructose which could be used in soft drinks in place of invert from sucrose. 

United States v. Barr Laboratories. Civil Action no. 92-1744. U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey. 

II) No independent cause of action. Subclause (I) does not authorize the assertion of a claim described in subclause (I) in any civil action or proceeding other than a counterclaim described in subclause (I). 

Aquino s July 1991 civil action to have these charges deleted from the record was denied by US District Judge, Claude M. Hilton, who found in favour of the Defendant. 

Michael Aquino, Plaintiff, v. The Honorable Michael Stone, Secretary of the Army, Defendant - Civil Action No. 90-1547-A, dated 1st July 1991, US District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, Alexandria Division. 

Most countries operate with statutory state compensation schemes, which companies may need to supplement with other private-based insurances both usually include economic-based incentive systems to improve chemical safety40 [233]. Environmental and product liability generally establish when civil action can be successfully taken against a company or an individual [234]. If a company is in compliance with the law, it is possible that civil action becomes directed towards the regulator in the form of judicial review for... 

Barr Court Decision, United States of America, Plaintiff, v. Barr Laboratories, Inc., et al. Defendants, Civil Action No. 92-1744,1992. 

In the United States, this is a civil action brought in the federal courts. The specific federal district court in which a patent owner can sue an infringer is governed by federal law. Patent litigation is very expensive and time-consuming. For this reason, it is not entered into without careful consideration of the consequences and analysis of all options available. In recent years, various alternative dispute-resolution proceedings have been used more often. 

During the last half century, a complex form of tort action known as the toxic tort has developed to address some of the challenges of modern industrial society. Typically, the toxic tort is a civil action that seeks damages for injury to person or to property arising from alleged exposure to a toxic substance, emis-... 

Bano et al. versus Union Carbide Corp. Warren Anderson, United States District Court Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 99, Civ. 11329 (JFK). 

Another important distinction between criminal and civil cases is the threshold burden of proof that must be reached in order to prove the case against the defendant. In a criminal case, the State must prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt . In civil actions, the plaintiff must prove his/her case on a balance of probabilities . The standard of proof for criminal matters is higher, essentially because an individual s life or liberty may be at risk. 

Forensic science is the application of a broad spectrum of science used to answer questions of interest to the legal profession. This may be defined as the application of science to law . This science can be applied in solving criminal cases or used in civil action cases. The use of analytical science in the legal profession is primarily concerned with the analysis of trace materials in which the crimes have taken place. The principle is that every contact leaves a trace that will offer potential evidence to link a suspect with the scene of the crime, victim or weapon. 

Perceptive Biosystems Inc., Pharmacia Biotech Inc., Sepracor Inc., Pharmacia LKB Biotechnology AB, Pharmacia Bioprocess Technology AB, and Procordia AB, United District Court, District of Massachussetts, Boston, MA, Civil Action No. 93-12237-PBS, Memorandum and Order, March 31 (1997). 

Prosecutions fines the annual report identifies 4.7 million as the ongoing cost of environmental remediation programmes and legal costs incurred on the wood preservative chemical spill . Both the CER and the annual report describe this spill in Tennessee in 1994, where civil action has recently resulted in an award of 8.4 million against Hickson (under appeal). In the CER details are also given of an unauthorised discharge of surface water at Pasadena, USA resulting in a 16 000 fine. 

---