Judge District

October 15 A U.S. district judge in Los Angeles overturns the county s ban on gun shows. He rules that state law preempts the county from legislating in this area, and that the county action poses an undue hardship to promoters who had sponsored the gun show for 22 years. 

Upjohn filed suit in the U.S. District Court of the Western District of Michigan to stop the FDA from removing the drugs and named Robert H. Finch, secretary of health, education, and welfare, and Herbert L. Ley, commissioner of the FDA, as defendants. With sales of the drugs reaching 30 million a year, Upjohn had a considerable stake in the case. The district judge issued an injunction to prevent the FDA from enforcing its order and then considered the merits of the suit. 

Responding to a suit against the FDA by the Washington Legal Foundation, a district court judge rules that the FDA cannot restrict truthful, non-misleading speech in DTC advertising. 

In his trial in district court, Rosenthal wanted to explain to jurors that he was acting with the blessing of California voters and of the city of Oakland, and that there was a medical necessity for patients to receive marijuana. However, federal district judge Charles Breyer refused to allow any such testimony to be presented at trial, deeming it irrelevant to a federal case. 

U.S. federal district court judge rejects a U.S. Justice Department attempt to overturn Oregon s physician-assisted suicide law. The Justice Department claimed that the state law violated the federal Controlled Substances Act. 

One of the justices, Stephen G. Breyer, declined to rule on the case because his brother, a U.S. district judge, had issued two of the original rulings that barred California cannabis buyers cooperatives from distributing marijuana. These rulings started the chain of events that brought the case to the Supreme Court. 

However, senior U.S. District Judge Rudi Brewster ruled that the plaintiffs did not have enough evidence to support their claims. He gave them additional time to produce new evidence, but when they failed to do so he ultimately dismissed the case with prejudice, meaning the plaintiffs cannot re-file it. 

Rudolf5s trial on account of the business with Remer s version ended in summer 1995. Under which star this trial was held was made blindingly clear by a document from the trial records Rudolf s judges in the District Court of Stuttgart wanted to prevent that they themselves should come under the wheels of denunciation and inquisition, as had the judges of the District Court of Mannheim in the Gunter Deckert Case, who were massively criticized by media and politicians,... 

The District Court judge went on to explain that a patent for the philosopher s stone was actually issued during the reign of Edward III. Apparently, they were not as keen on the written description requirement back in those days. Neither were they very keen on the utility requirement—a credible utility must be alleged (though perhaps it was a credible utility at that time). However, there probably would be no rejections based on novelty for such a claim. 

The results of the 2nd District Court trial were perplexing. Judge Milton Pollack ruled that the church was not bona fide because it was selling peyote. On the other hand, he declared that Birnbaum—although he, too, was selling peyote—was bona fide because he sincerely believed that "peyote was God. ... 

Judge Pollack s ruling that the church was not bona fide was appealed on constitutional grounds and denied because in the opinion of the new judge Birnbaum hadn t been found bona fide He also declared that if anyone were to be accepted as bona fide, then peyote could be used in worship by everyone in the jurisdiction of the 2nd District Court, which includes Vermont, Connecticut and New York. 

Aquino s July 1991 civil action to have these charges deleted from the record was denied by US District Judge, Claude M. Hilton, who found in favour of the Defendant. 

MARCH 19, 2001, ARRAIGNMENT/SENTENCING BEFORE THE HONORABLE CONSUELO B. MARSHALL UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE. 

Cf. Salzburg District Court judge Dr. F. Schmidbauer s letter-to-the-editor in Profit, 17/91 the author thanks W. Luftl for this reference. 

The proceedings to expatriate Demjanjuk began in 1981 before the Cleveland District Court. Naturally, five survivors of Treblinka recognized Demjanjuk as Ivan the Terrible, and the Court s copies of the Trawniki ID card No. 1393 became the chief piece of evidence on whose basis judge Battisti stripped Demjanjuk of his American citizenship.12... 

---