Chemicals emission rates

ECMA (2007) Standard 328. Determination of Chemical Emission Rates from Electronic Equipment, European Computer Manufacturers Association, http //www.ecma-intemational.org/... 

ISO/IEC (2007) 28360. Determination of Chemical Emission Rates From Electronic Equipment, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland. 

In its simplest form, a model requires two types of data inputs information on the source or sources including pollutant emission rate, and meteorological data such as wind velocity and turbulence. The model then simulates mathematically the pollutant s transport and dispersion, and perhaps its chemical and physical transformations and removal processes. The model output is air pollutant concentration for a particular time period, usually at specific receptor locations. 

Engineering calculations predict emission rates without tlie use of emission factors. These calculations use basic science and engineering principles, chemical property data, and operating conditions to provide a detailed analysis of the emissions for a specific process. Tliis is a more sophisticated approach tluui emission factors, and is useful for evaluating various operational and control alteniatives. 

In addition to dissipation of the substance from the model system through degradation, other dissipative mechanisms can be considered. Neely and Mackay(26) and Mackay(3) have also introduced advection (loss of the chemical from the troposphere via diffusion) and sedimentation (loss of the chemical from dynamic regions of the system by movement deep into sedimentation layers). Both of these mechanisms are then assumed to act in the unit world. This approach makes it possible to investigate the behavior of atmosphere emissions where advection can be a significant process. Therefore, from a regulatory standpoint if the emission rate exceeds the advection rate and degradation processes in a system, accumulation of material could be expected. Based on such an analysis reduction of emissions would be called for. 

For environmental purposes, different approaches for predicting environmental concentrations have been used. Table 3 gives some representative examples of these studies. The input data required are usually the production or consumption of chemicals in the studied area that allow estimating their emission rates to the environment. Depending on the complexity of the scenario, different number of variables can be used to achieve the prediction. 

The persistence or residence time of the chemical is independent of the emission rate, but it does depend on the mode of entry, i.e., into which compartment the chemical is emitted. ... 

Because wholesale bans of this type will not occur, then another approach to achieving safety, at least for pollutants, might be suggested. Why not seek the goal of no detectable chemicals in the media of human exposure If automobiles emit various nitrogen oxides, simply ensure that emission rates are sufficiently low so that these noxious chemicals cannot be found in air. If PCBs are migrating from a hazardous waste site, impose limits on that migration so that no detectable PCBs are found in the off-site environment. Control afla-toxin contamination of raw food commodities to ensure none can be found in finished foods. Why not apply this approach to all pollutants (it obviously is not applicable to products) ... 

Chemical [CASRN] Concentration in Gasoline mg/kg wt% Gas-Phase Emission Rate mg/km... 

Emission Inventory scaling, proposed by (24), uses the relative emission rates of two source types subject to approximately the same dispersion factor (e.g., residential heating by woodstoves and natural gas) to approximate the source contribution from the source type not included in the chemical mass balance (e.g., natural gas combustion). The ratio of the emission rates is multiplied by the contribution of the source type which was included in the balance. 

Deep state experiments measure carrier capture or emission rates, processes that are not sensitive to the microscopic structure (such as chemical composition, symmetry, or spin) of the defect. Therefore, the various techniques for analysis of deep states can at best only show a correlation with a particular impurity when used in conjunction with doping experiments. A definitive, unambiguous assignment is impossible without the aid of other experiments, such as high-resolution absorption or luminescence spectroscopy, or electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR). Unfortunately, these techniques are usually inapplicable to most deep levels. However, when absorption or luminescence lines are detectable and sharp, the symmetry of a defect can be deduced from Zeeman or stress experiments (see, for example, Ozeki et al. 1979b). In certain cases the energy of a transition is sensitive to the isotopic mass of an impurity, and use of isotopically enriched dopants can yield a positive chemical identification of a level. 

Sato and Seo [277] demonstrated that a silver catalyst continuously emits low-energy electrons. This emission is chemically stimulated when the catalyst produces ethylene oxide. There is a strong correlation between the production rate and the emission rate. The emitting layer is continuously renewed and is apparently silver oxide. 

The importance of photochemical destruction in the 03s tropospheric budget implies that the lifetime of 03s is coupled to the chemical production and destruction of 03. Consequently, the simulated tropospheric budget of 03s may be affected directly by differences in the simulated chemistry. For example, simulations with a pre-industrial and a present-day emission scenario or with and without representation of NMHC chemistry will produce different estimates of the tropospheric oxidation efficiencies [39, 40]. However, our simulations indicate only small effects on the calculated 03s budget [6]. Figure 5 presents the simulated zonal distribution of 03s, the chemical destruction rate, of ozone (day"1) and the chemical loss of 03s (ppbv day 1) for the climatological April. The bulk of the 03s in the troposphere resides immediately below the tropopause, whereas the ozone chemical destruction rate maximizes in the tropical lower troposphere (Figures 5a and 5b). Hence, most 03s is photochemically destroyed between 15-25 °N and below 500 hPa. This region... 

Personal computers (PCs) are important sources of VOCs in office and homes (Bako-Biro et al., 2004).Thus, the TVOCs emission rate per PC observed in a glass chamber study was as high as 486.6 pg/h while individual emission rates for toluene and phenol were 47 and 63 pg/h respectively. Other prominent chemicals emitted by PCs include, 2-ethylhexanol, formaldehyde and styrene (Bako-Biro et al., 2004). (See Chapter 17 for a more detailed discussion of VOCs in electronic devices.)... 

Note that this behavior relates to single VOCs. Since organic compounds will have different physico-chemical properties (especially volatility, polarity, molar volume, hydrolytic stability) that influence their emission behavior, it is quite possible for a material to emit one group of dominant VOCs in its early emissions and a different group later (e.g., when a wet paint film has dried ), in each case at somewhat different orders of emission rates. 

Hawkins, N.C., Luedtke, A.E. and Mitchell, C.R. (1992) Effects of selected process parameters on emission rates of volatile organic chemicals from carpet. American Industrial Hygiene Association Journal, 53 (5), 275-82. 

The emission of a complete set of personal computers and monitors are described by Nakagawa et al. (2003). Several VOC like benzene, toluene, etc. were identified and quantified. The results are shown in Table 17.3. The emission rates of aliphatic hydrocarbons, terpenes, esters, ketones, alcohols and halogens were not found to be significantly different for PCs with CRT and TFT monitors. In the case of aromatic hydrocarbons the emission rates were higher if a PC with CRT monitor was used. The same was found for aldehyde emissions but the differences in emission rates were lower. The separate test CRT monitor and the associated computer in this study proved that the monitor was the main source of chemical emissions. 

Night-time emission rates in rural and urban areas are listed in Table I together with initial concentrations and land deposition velocities. The initial concentrations were chosen to reflect unpolluted air arriving at the West Coast of England. Methane is assumed to be present in the atmospheric boundary layer at a constant concentration of 1.6 ppm. Water vapour is also assumed to be invariant in rural and urban air at a concentration of 104 ppm. This corresponds to ca. 60% relative humidity at 288 K. The initial concentration and emission over land of DMS have been taken to be zero as have all other species in the chemical scheme which are not listed in Table I. Emissions over land of NO, SO hydrocarbons, CO and H are subject to diurnal variation and this has been treated as before (13.141. Rural emission rates are assumed to prevail throughout the traversal of Scandinavia. All species are assumed to be hilly mixed within an atmospheric boundary layer of constant depth, taken to be... 

Encapsulation in containment vessels allows near zero emission rates to be reached in miniplants, e.g. by purging the reactor with an inert gas sent to a scrubber. This embedding of the miniplant should also dramatically reduce the risk of explosion or environmental contamination in case of an accident Even if modules of the miniplant are damaged or break, the robust encasement will be mechanically and chemically stable enough to prevent pollution. 

---