Calibration exercise

A detailed study of the phase relationships in the magnesium oxysulphate cement was carried out by Urwongse Sorrell (1980b). They used X-ray analysis to examine the phases present in the cement, and established the composition of the invariant liquids after equilibration by measuring specific gravity with the aid of a pycnometer. Specific gravities were related to concentration by means of a calibration exercise in which 30 stock solutions of sulphuric acid at concentrations between 0 and 79-5 wt % were prepared with distilled water. 

A calibration exercise for an atomic absorption method to be used in the determination of a metal yielded the following results ... 

Related to the issue of realism, we predict that models incorporating self-control problems (especially, we conjecture, models that include an element of naivete) will be better calibrated than rational choice models and hence make sounder quantitathv predictions. We do not have empirical evidence for this conjecture, but to illustrate our reasoning we present a simple calibration exercise within our framework We demonstrate how very patient people with very small self-control problems can get addicted in situations in which time-consistent people would get addicted only if they were to discount the future at an implausibly heavy rate. 

Endeavors promoting development, validation and refinement of toxicity testing procedures 3.1.1 Test method development 3.1.2 Inter-calibration exercises 3.1.3 Comparative studies... 

Beyond test development and validation, inter-calibration exercises (also known as round robin or inter-laboratory exercises ) are mandatory steps that must be undertaken if a toxicity test method is intended for standardization. These exercises... 

For example, inter-calibration exercises have been undertaken with algae (Thellen et al., 1989), bacteria (Ribo, 1997 Ross et al., 1999 ), fish cells (Gagne et al., 1999a), invertebrates (Cowgill, 1986 Persoone et al., 1993 Burton et al., 1996 Hayes et al., 1996), protozoans (Dive et al., 1990), and test organisms of several biotic levels (Rue et al., 1988 Ronco et al., 2002). 

If toxicity tests fulfill the scientific criteria set out by inter-calibration exercises, they can then be considered for the standardization process. If this process is followed, an official toxicity test method document is eventually produced that ensures proper conduct of biological tests (see Section 3.2.1). 

Test method standardization (TMS) calls for several actions that involve 1) preparation of a formal draft test method document for each bioassay intended for standardization, 2) a critical review by an expert subcommittee, 3) the preparation of a final draft test method, 4) an international peer review of each test method, 5) an inter-calibration exercise of the final draft test method, 6) finalization of each test method and 7) the formal publication of the toxicity test method document. Environment Canada (EC) has been particularly active in biological test method standardization and has thus far contributed 18 standardized aquatic and sediment... 

It is essential to identify and separate these two types of errors to avoid confusion. If numerical errors are not isolated, they may lead to undesirable spurious model calibration exercises. It is, therefore, necessary to devise systematic methods to quantify numerical errors. The basic idea behind error analysis is to obtain a quantitative measure of numerical errors, to devise corrective measures to ensure that numerical errors are within tolerable limits and the results obtained are almost independent of numerical parameters. Having established adequate control of numerical errors, the simulated results may be compared with experimental data to evaluate errors in physical modeling. The latter process is called model validation. Several examples of model validation are discussed in Chapters 10 to 14. In this section, some comments on error analysis are made. 

Standard quality control procedures were followed. These Included a) careful washing of all glassware In strong oxidizing solutions and with Type I water b) frequent analyses of glassware and reagent blanks c) analyses of procedural blanks with each batch of samples and d) calibration of Instruments before each set of analyses by analyzing standard solutions. Analytical proficiency In the analysis of biota and sediment samples have been demonstrated by participation In round-robin type Interlaboratory calibration exercises (2 ). 

PRZM was calibrated to field data on the pesticide aldicarb applied to two potato sites in Wisconsin and one tobacco site in North Carolina (7-9). Field data required for the calibration exercise include soil physical parameters, crop cultural... 

The purpose of the calibration exercise was to determine appropriate parameters which would result in a best-fit match between model simulations and the soil core field observations. The first step in the procedure was to assign values to field-measured, physically-based, parameters which include all parameters for the water balance and crop development portions of the model. The second step was to calibrate chemically and biologically based parameters which are not easily measured in the field. These include the adsorption partition coefficient, K, and the first-order rate of decay, k, of aldicarb. Using reasonable ranges of and k as defined by the literature, a trial-and-error method was used until model predictions matched field observations. 

Figures 1-5 show the final calibrated results. Despite some differences, it can be seen that the Important considerations of mass balance and trends in concentration-depth profiles are well met in the calibration exercise.

As palaeoceanographic reconstructions based on bulk fossil chemistry proliferate, comparability of measurements between laboratories has become an important issue. A recent calibration exercise involving thirteen laboratories by Rosenthal et al. (2004) evaluated the reproducibility of analyses of synthetic standard solutions within and between laboratories. The study found that intralaboratory instrumental precisions were generally better than 0.5% for both Mg/Ca and Sr/Ca measurements, but interlahoratory precisions (r.s.d) were significantly worse (up to 3.4% and 1.8%, respectively). This could be a result of differences between cahbration standards used by laboratories, or because the circulated standard solutions had become contaminated in the interval between their... 

The THM response of the buffer and rock mass were monitored by a network of instruments. For example, sensors to measure water content, temperature, pore pressure, stress and strain in the bentonite were installed at three radial sections. In the calibration exercise, tbe evolution of the temperature, water content, pore pressure, stress and strain along one radial axis intersecting the centre of the heater will be calculated and the calculated results will be compared and adjusted to the measured results. 

Early nutrient calibration exercises Koroleffand Palmork, 1977 Grasshoff, 1977), where most laboratories used the reduced silicomolybdic add method for the determination of silicate with either metol-sulphite or ascorbic add as the reductant determined precisions of 4 % at 4.5nxaoVL, 2.5 % at 45/imol/L and 6% at the ISO/nnol/L level. These figures probably represent the attainable level of precision in joint experiments including an intercalibration exercise. 

Validation and calibration comparisons of the O Flaherty model with measured exposure data have been reported, but fewer than were done for the lEUBK system. While the validation and calibration exercises carried out by O Flaherty have included test animal dosing data and experimental PbB comparisons for rats (O Flaherty, 1991) and nonhuman primates (Cynomolgus monkeys, Franklin et al., 1997), such efforts also included children and adults (O Flaherty, 1993, 1995, 1998). 

Model use in the many analyses done inside and outside the Box areas but within the CDARB also involved adjustments to the lEUBK model default settings based on relative concordance with measured PbB values. Unlike many site cases where the only empirical data set for comparison with this model s simulated PbB outputs is an isolated PbB screening, the Box communities have been the beneficiaries of annual extensive PbB monitoring by the Panhandle Health District, with more than 5,000 measurements systematically and reliably gathered. This large body of measurement data makes the calibration exercise for the model much more reliable. 

Writing or reviewing articles on NIRS involves researching the literature. To communicate the results of a NIRS exercise effectively up to 16 pieces of information should be included. These are summarized in Table 7.1.1. Very few papers contain all of this information, or even enough for a full evaluation of the efficiency of the calibration exercise. Items 11,14, and 15 (RPD) can give a good approximate evaluation of a calibration. Minimum acceptable values for the RPD and RER are 3.0 and 10.0, respectively. Some of the papers that are cited in Tables 7.1.4 and 7.1.5 have been found to have RPD values as low as 1.05. If the RPD is 1.0 this means that the SEP is equal to the SD of the reference data of the validation samples set (whether cross-validation or a test set is used), and the calibration model is of no practical value in analysis. 

As mentioned in the previous chapter, supply chain efforts progress through five levels in a sequence. As a firm or business unit moves through these levels, the various functions make progress or they restrict the overall effort. Considering each of the major functions in a typical firm and the levels of evolution provides an opportunity to begin the calibration exercise. Figure 2.1 presents an overview of the major business applications matched with the five levels of supply chain evolution. 

---