Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Bonding interactions proteins

N is the number of point charges within the molecule and Sq is the dielectric permittivity of the vacuum. This form is used especially in force fields like AMBER and CHARMM for proteins. As already mentioned, Coulombic 1,4-non-bonded interactions interfere with 1,4-torsional potentials and are therefore scaled (e.g., by 1 1.2 in AMBER). Please be aware that Coulombic interactions, unlike the bonded contributions to the PEF presented above, are not limited to a single molecule. If the system under consideration contains more than one molecule (like a peptide in a box of water), non-bonded interactions have to be calculated between the molecules, too. This principle also holds for the non-bonded van der Waals interactions, which are discussed in Section 7.2.3.6. [Pg.345]

OPTS (Optim i/.ed Potentials for Liquid Simulations) is based on a force field developed by the research group of Bill Jorgensen now at Yale University and previously at Purdue University. Like AMBER, the OPLS force field is designed for calculations on proteins an d nucleic acids. It in troduces non bonded in leraclion parameters that have been carefully developed from extensive Monte Carlo liquid sim u lation s of small molecules. These n on-bonded interactions have been added to the bonding interactions of AMBER to produce a new force field that is expected to be better than AMBER at describing simulations w here the solvent isexplic-... [Pg.191]

Proper condensed phase simulations require that the non-bond interactions between different portions of the system under study be properly balanced. In biomolecular simulations this balance must occur between the solvent-solvent (e.g., water-water), solvent-solute (e.g., water-protein), and solute-solute (e.g., protein intramolecular) interactions [18,21]. Having such a balance is essential for proper partitioning of molecules or parts of molecules in different environments. For example, if the solvent-solute interaction of a glutamine side chain were overestimated, there would be a tendency for the side chain to move into and interact with the solvent. The first step in obtaining this balance is the treatment of the solvent-solvent interactions. The majority of biomolecular simulations are performed using the TIP3P [81] and SPC/E [82] water models. [Pg.22]

C Colovos, TO Yeates. Verification of protein stiaictures Patterns of non-bonded atomic interactions. Protein Sci 2 1511-1519, 1993. [Pg.311]

The thioredoxin domain (see Figure 2.7) has a central (3 sheet surrounded by a helices. The active part of the molecule is a Pa(3 unit comprising p strands 2 and 3 joined by a helix 2. The redox-active disulfide bridge is at the amino end of this a helix and is formed by a Cys-X-X-Cys motif where X is any residue in DsbA, in thioredoxin, and in other members of this family of redox-active proteins. The a-helical domain of DsbA is positioned so that this disulfide bridge is at the center of a relatively extensive hydrophobic protein surface. Since disulfide bonds in proteins are usually buried in a hydrophobic environment, this hydrophobic surface in DsbA could provide an interaction area for exposed hydrophobic patches on partially folded protein substrates. [Pg.97]

The NMR study by Wiithrich and coworkers has shown that there is a cavity between the protein and the DNA in the major groove of the Antennapedia complex. There are several water molecules in this cavity with a residence time with respect to exchange with bulk water in the millisecond to nanosecond range. These observations indicate that at least some of the specific protein-DNA interactions are short-lived and mediated by water molecules. In particular, the interactions between DNA and the highly conserved Gin 50 and the invariant Asn 51 are best rationalized as a fluctuating network of weak-bonding interactions involving interfacial hydration water molecules. [Pg.162]

Ribosomes, the supramolecular assemblies where protein synthesis occurs, are about 65% RNA of the ribosomal RNA type. Ribosomal RNA (rRNA) molecules fold into characteristic secondary structures as a consequence of intramolecular hydrogen bond interactions (marginal figure). The different species of rRNA are generally referred to according to their sedimentation coefficients (see the Appendix to Chapter 5), which are a rough measure of their relative size (Table 11.2 and Figure 11.25). [Pg.343]

OPLS is designed for calculations on proteins and nucleic acids the non-bonded interactions have been carefully developed from liquid simulations on small molecules. There are many more force fields in the literature, but the ones given above are representative. [Pg.46]

The steady structure determined by the value of Kw (Fig. 1) for the entire class of carboxylic CP obtained by precipitation copolymerization is one of the most important factors determining the possibility of reversible bonding of proteins absorbed by carboxylic CP with a high sorption capacity [16,19]. Thus, for the MA-HHTT system (Fig. 2), a complete desorption of enzyme is carried out on crosslinked copolymers characterized by low Kw values. In crosslinked structures exhibiting looser structure (Kw P 1), owing to the mobility of chain fragments of CP especially in the process of desorption, the macromolecules of sorbed protein are irreversibly captured as a result of a marked polyfunctional interaction. [Pg.7]

The drawback of the described adsorbents is the leakage of the bonded phase that may occur after the change of eluent or temperature of operation when the equilibrium of the polymer adsorption is disturbed. In order to prepare a more stable support Dulout et al. [31] introduced the treatment of porous silica with PEO, poly-lV-vinylpyrrolidone or polyvinylalcohol solution followed by a second treatment with an aqueous solution of a protein whose molecular weight was lower than that of the proteins to be separated. Possibly, displacement of the weakly adsorbed coils by the stronger interacting proteins produce an additional shrouding of the polymer-coated supports. After the weakly adsorbed portion was replaced, the stability of the mixed adsorption layer was higher. [Pg.144]

In an unwound heiix, the bases are exposed and can form new hydrogen-bonding interactions. In protein synthesis, the unwound DNA sequence serves as a tempiate to buiid a moiecuie of RNA whose base sequence is compiementary to that of the DNA sequence. The RNA moiecuie, in turn, serves as a biueprint for protein manufacture. In replication, as the iiiustration shows, unwinding and dupiication generates two identicai DNA heiices from a singie heiix. [Pg.940]

An affinity label is a molecule that contains a functionality that is chemically reactive and will therefore form a covalent bond with other molecules containing a complementary functionality. Generally, affinity labels contain electrophilic functionalities that form covalent bonds with protein nucleophiles, leading to protein alkylation or protein acylation. In some cases affinity labels interact selectively with specific amino acid side chains, and this feature of the molecule can make them useful reagents for defining the importance of certain amino acid types in enzyme function. For example, iodoacetate and A-ethyl maleimide are two compounds that selectively modify the sulfur atom of cysteine side chains. These compounds can therefore be used to test the functional importance of cysteine residues for an enzyme s activity. This topic is covered in more detail below in Section 8.4. [Pg.219]

In the end, what is unique about computational methods is their ability to describe transition states and intermediates. This is why the calculation of reaction mechanisms has achieved such a prominent position in quantum biochemistry. We will therefore spend a considerable amount of time to describe when improved active-site geometries can be expected to give important beneficial effects on reaction energies. In addition, we will try to describe how the non-bonded interactions between active site and surrounding protein affect relative energies. [Pg.32]

Energetic Effects ofNon-bonded Interactions Between Protein and Active Site... [Pg.49]


See other pages where Bonding interactions proteins is mentioned: [Pg.447]    [Pg.447]    [Pg.2663]    [Pg.137]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.368]    [Pg.239]    [Pg.535]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.250]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.19]    [Pg.147]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.117]    [Pg.270]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.348]    [Pg.354]    [Pg.393]    [Pg.238]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.293]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.49]   


SEARCH



Bond interactions

Bonded interactions

Bonded proteins

Bonding interactions

Carbohydrate-protein interaction hydrogen bonding

Hydrophobic bonding, protein surface interaction

Protein bonds

Protein electrostatic interactions, bond strength

Protein targets, hydrogen bonding interactions

Proteins bonding

© 2024 chempedia.info