Assessment of facility

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA)—a reference tool for Environmental Professionals conducting Environmental Impact Assessments of facility-related projects, new or... 

During the design phase, facilities (the hardware items of equipment) are designed for operating conditions which are anticipated based upon the information gathered during field appraisal, and upon the outcome of studies such as the reservoir simulation. The design parameters will typically be based upon assessments of... 

Assessment Phase The assessment phase aims to collect data needed to identify and analyze pollution-prevention opportunities. Assessment of the facility s waste-reduction needs includes the examination of hazardous waste streams, process operations, and the identification of techniques that often promise the reduction of waste generation. Information is often derived from obsei vations made during a facihty walk-through, interviews with employees (e.g., operators, line workers), and review of site or regulatory records. One professional organization suggests the following information sources be reviewed, as available (Ref. 7) ... 

Facility assessment of toxicological data, quantity of material used, and operating conditions indicated plausible conditions exist which could cause serious health effects to nearby receptor. 

This sample, referred to in Chapter 2, can serve as a guide for planning and conducting assessments of tollers. It may require additions, revisions, or other modifications in order to meet the needs of facility specific assessment objectives, the facility setting, or other special circumstances. This sample includes ... 

Chu, T. L. et al., 1990, Quantification of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment of the High Flux Beam Reactoi (HFBR) at Brookhaven National Laboratory, ANS Topical Meeting, The Safety, Siauis and Future of Non-Commercial Reactors and Irradiation Facilities, Boise, ID, Sepiember Ol - October 4, 1990. 

To limit the potential for deficiencies to escape detection before the product is released, special processes should be documented in the form of procedures and specifications that will ensure the suitability of all equipment, personnel, and facilities, and prevent varying conditions, activities, or operations. Qualification in the context of special processes means that you need to conduct a thorough assessment of the processes to determine their capability to maintain or detect the conditions needed to produce conforming product consistently. The limits of capability need to be determined and the processes only applied within these limits. In qualifying the processes you need to qualify the personnel using them by training and examination as well as the materials, equipment, and facilities employed. It is the combination of personnel, materials, equipment, and facilities which ensure qualified processes. 

Buy-in" of facility management. Cooperation of facility-based staff and managers strongly influences the effectiveness of baseline PSM assessments. The assessment phase may be the first visible manifestation of your company s PSM initiative at the local level, and should be properly understood by those participating—especially those whose PSM activities and programs are under review. An assessment method with which local personnel are at least somewhat familiar, conducted by professionals whose skills they respect, will more likely gain buy-in and cooperation. 

Risk analysis is an assessment of the likelihood (probability) of an accidental release of a hazardous material and tlie actual consequences tliat might occur, based on tlie estimated vulnerable zones. It provides an estimation of tlie likelihood (probability) of an accidental release, tlie severity of consequences of human injuiy that may occur, the severity of consequences on critical facilities, tlie severity of consequences of damage to property, and the severity of consequences of damage to tlie enviromiient. 

M. Kazarians, W. J. Bradford, and M. J. Abrams, "Risk Assessment of a Process Facility," paper presented at AICliE Orange County Section Annual Teclmical Meeting, Oct. 15,1985. 

Where full canteen facilities are provided an accurate assessment of the hours of operation must be obtained so that plant and services are correctly sized. The operating hours will also greatly influence the need to provide separate plant from the main building, especially if meals are to be provided at the end of each shift. 

Appendices This section is most likely to contain additional data associated with biological-based products. It should contain information as regards the facilities and equipment used for the manufacture of biotech products. Assessment of the risk of contamination from adventitious agents such as transmissible spongiform encephalopathy agents (TSEs), bacteria, mycoplasma, fungi or viruses should also be provided. Additional information on novel excipients that have not been used before should also be included in this section. 

To satisfy government agencies, instruments need to be adequately tested, calibrated, and/or standardized according to documented procedures. Current GLP standards state that equipment used in the generation, measurement, or assessment of data and equipment used for facility environmental control must be of appropriate design and capacity to function according to the protocol and shall be suitably located for operation, inspection, cleaning, and maintenance. 

Careful attention to such detail is necessary as a second line of defence against the effects of reactive hazards. The level of protection considered necessary may range from the essential and absolute minimum of effective eye protection, via the safety screen, fume cupboard or enclosed reactor, up to the ultimate of a remotely controlled and blast-resistant isolation cell (usually for high-pressure operations). In the absence of facilities appropriate to the assessed level of hazard, operations must be deferred until such facilities are available. 

Nati onal Cancer Insti tute Assessment of historic exposures of acrylonitrile in eight U.S. facilities between 1952 and 1965 NCI/NIOSH... 

Assessment of Exposure-Response Functions for Rocket-Emission Toxicants (1998) Review of a Screening Level Risk Assessment for the Naval Air Facility at Atsugi, Japan (Letter Report) (1998)... 

Currently, scientists and experts from many countries are working on development and implementation of a readiness for anti terrorist actions. In addition to chemical weapons, terrorists can use various toxic chemicals from chemical industry, agriculture or products released from terrorist acts on industrial facilities. The arsenal of chemical agents that can be used as terrorist agents is practically unlimited. The focus of this workshop was assessment of scientific concepts and practical means for management of chemical agent casualties in the area of terrorist attack with emphasis on improving the medical treatment and decontamination. These problems were analyzed from an interdisciplinary perspective. 

A designer, as part of his facility design analysis, should perform a hazards analysis or risk assessment of the various processes which will be conducted within the facility in order to determine what potential thermal dangers or threats exist to personnel and equipment. A hazards analysis or risk assessment will provide for the identification of potential hazards and of the necessary corrective actions/measures to prevent or control the hazard. Early in the design of a facility, the processes and equipment may be conceptual and at this stage, a preliminary hazards analysis can be performed. It is early in the design that a preliminary hazards analysis can be most helpful because its... 

Facility System Safety (FSS), which is the application of system safety concepts to the facility acquisition process, has recently gained acceptance throughout the Department of Defense and most recently within the Department of Army with the conception of SAFEARMY 1990. The Army s goal is to fully integrate the total system safety, human factors, and health hazard assessments into continuous comprehensive evaluation of selected systems and facilities. The Chemical Research Development and Engineering Center (CRDEC) has mandated appropriate levels of system safety throughout the lifecycle of facility development for many reasons. These include ... 

Nuclear power facility safety, 77 531-561 assessment of, 77 538-542 basic principles of, 77 533-536 characteristics of, 7 7 542-551 design of, 77 536-542 first barrier in, 7 7 536-537 fourth barrier in, 77 538 future of, 77 554-557 operational, 77 538 radiation exposure and health standards, 77 551-554 second barrier in, 7 7 537 third barrier in, 77 537-538 Nuclear power plants... 

The goal of assessing risk is to build on the knowledge of chemical reactivity hazards, to understand how the hazard properties may lead to loss scenarios in the facility context, and to determine whether existing safeguards are adequate. Therefore, the assessment of risk can be performed at any stage of facility design, development, operation, or alteration. Of course, the more that is known about the facility and its equipment and operation, the more detailed the risk assessment can be. Methods used to determine chemical reaction risks are varied, as are their objectives and data requirements. 

Many methods have been developed that are suitable for assessing risks associated with the operation of facilities involving chemical reactivity hazards. The more commonly used methods are summarized in Table 4.9. They differ in their applicability, level of effort, and how systematic they are in identifying accident scenarios. All of the methods except layer of protection analysis (LOPA) may be applied qualitatively, and all except checklist reviews may be performed in at least a semiquantitative manner. CCPS (1992a) is a basic source of information on each of these methods. 

---