Analytical methods sample concentration

This chapter includes sections on The Analytical Method, Sampling and Sample Treatment, Separation and Concentration, Method Classification, and Determinative Methods. The principal thrust of this chapter is a general summary of some of the more common and current analytical methodologies employed for the determination of total elemental contents in a wide variety of biological and environmental materials. Coverage here is general the reader is referred to other chapters in this book for particular details on individual elements covered there and to the many publications referred in this chapter. The chapter... 

Typically, PIXE measurements are perfonned in a vacuum of around 10 Pa, although they can be perfonned in air with some limitations. Ion currents needed are typically a few nanoamperes and current is nonnally not a limiting factor in applying the teclmique with a particle accelerator. This beam current also nonnally leads to no significant damage to samples in the process of analysis, offering a non-destmctive analytical method sensitive to trace element concentration levels. 

That all four methods give a different result for the concentration of analyte underscores the importance of choosing a proper blank but does not tell us which of the methods is correct. In fact, the variation within each method for the reported concentration of analyte indicates that none of these four methods has adequately corrected for the blank. Since the three samples were drawn from the same source, they must have the same true concentration of analyte. Since all four methods predict concentrations of analyte that are dependent on the size of the sample, we can conclude that none of these blank corrections has accounted for an underlying constant source of determinate error. 

Three replicate determinations of the signal for a standard solution of an analyte at a concentration of 10.0 ppm give values of 0.163, 0.157, and 0.161 (arbitrary units), respectively. The signal for a method blank was found to be 0.002. Calculate the concentration of analyte in a sample that gives a signal of 0.118. 

In this experiment the overall variance for the analysis of potassium hydrogen phthalate (KHP) in a mixture of KHP and sucrose is partitioned into that due to sampling and that due to the analytical method (an acid-base titration). By having individuals analyze samples with different % w/w KHP, the relationship between sampling error and concentration of analyte can be explored. 

Most potentiometric electrodes are selective for only the free, uncomplexed analyte and do not respond to complexed forms of the analyte. Solution conditions, therefore, must be carefully controlled if the purpose of the analysis is to determine the analyte s total concentration. On the other hand, this selectivity provides a significant advantage over other quantitative methods of analysis when it is necessary to determine the concentration of free ions. For example, calcium is present in urine both as free Ca + ions and as protein-bound Ca + ions. If a urine sample is analyzed by atomic absorption spectroscopy, the signal is proportional to the total concentration of Ca +, since both free and bound calcium are atomized. Analysis with a Ca + ISE, however, gives a signal that is a function of only free Ca + ions since the protein-bound ions cannot interact with the electrode s membrane. 

Environmental Applications Although ion-selective electrodes find use in environmental analysis, their application is not as widespread as in clinical analysis. Standard methods have been developed for the analysis of CN , F , NH3, and in water and wastewater. Except for F , however, other analytical methods are considered superior. By incorporating the ion-selective electrode into a flow cell, the continuous monitoring of wastewater streams and other flow systems is possible. Such applications are limited, however, by the electrode s response to the analyte s activity, rather than its concentration. Considerable interest has been shown in the development of biosensors for the field screening and monitoring of environmental samples for a number of priority pollutants. 

Suppose we have a sample containing an analyte in a matrix that is incompatible with our analytical method. To determine the analyte s concentration we first separate it from the matrix using, for example, a liquid-liquid extraction. If there are additional analytes, we may need to use additional extractions to isolate them from the analyte s matrix. For a complex mixture of analytes this quickly becomes a tedious process. 

Adjusting the Analyte s Concentration Analytes present at concentrations too small to give an adequate signal need to be concentrated before analyzing. A side benefit of many of the extraction methods outlined earlier is that they often concentrate the analytes. Volatile organic materials isolated from aqueous samples by a purge and trap, for example, can be concentrated by as much as 1000-fold. 

Single-operator characteristics are determined by analyzing a sample whose concentration of analyte is known to the analyst. The second step in verifying a method is the blind analysis of standard samples where the analyte s concentration remains unknown to the analyst. The standard sample is analyzed several times, and the average concentration of the analyte is determined. This value should be within three, and preferably two standard deviations (as determined from the single-operator characteristics) of the analyte s known concentration. 

A final component of a quality control program is the certification of an analyst s competence to perform the analysis for which he or she is responsible. Before an analyst is allowed to perform a new analytical method, he or she may be required to successfully analyze an independent check sample with acceptable accuracy and precision. The check sample should be similar in composition to samples that the analyst will routinely encounter, with a concentration that is 5 to 50 times that of the method s detection limit. 

Spike recoveries on method blanks and field blanks are used to evaluate the general performance of an analytical procedure. The concentration of analyte added to the blank should be between 5 and 50 times the method s detection limit. Systematic errors occurring during sampling and transport will result in an unacceptable recovery for the field blank, but not for the method blank. Systematic errors occurring in the laboratory, however, will affect the recoveries for both the field and method blanks. 

Quantitative mass spectrometry, also used for pharmaceutical appHcations, involves the use of isotopicaHy labeled internal standards for method calibration and the calculation of percent recoveries (9). Maximum sensitivity is obtained when the mass spectrometer is set to monitor only a few ions, which are characteristic of the target compounds to be quantified, a procedure known as the selected ion monitoring mode (sim). When chlorinated species are to be detected, then two ions from the isotopic envelope can be monitored, and confirmation of the target compound can be based not only on the gc retention time and the mass, but on the ratio of the two ion abundances being close to the theoretically expected value. The spectrometer cycles through the ions in the shortest possible time. This avoids compromising the chromatographic resolution of the gc, because even after extraction the sample contains many compounds in addition to the analyte. To increase sensitivity, some methods use sample concentration techniques. 

Analysis for Poly(Ethylene Oxide). Another special analytical method takes advantage of the fact that poly(ethylene oxide) forms a water-insoluble association compound with poly(acryhc acid). This reaction can be used in the analysis of the concentration of poly(ethylene oxide) in a dilute aqueous solution. Ereshly prepared poly(acryhc acid) is added to a solution of unknown poly(ethylene oxide) concentration. A precipitate forms, and its concentration can be measured turbidimetricaHy. Using appropriate caUbration standards, the precipitate concentration can then be converted to concentration of poly(ethylene oxide). The optimum resin concentration in the unknown sample is 0.2—0.4 ppm. Therefore, it is necessary to dilute more concentrated solutions to this range before analysis (97). Low concentrations of poly(ethylene oxide) in water may also be determined by viscometry (98) or by complexation with KI and then titration with Na2S202 (99). 

How does the range of concentrations of air pollutants of concern to the industrial hygienist differ from that of concern to the air pollution specialist To what extent are air sampling and analytical methods in factories and in the ambient air the same or different ... 

The information obtained during the background search and from the source inspection will enable selection of the test procedure to be used. The choice will be based on the answers to several questions (1) What are the legal requirements For specific sources there may be only one acceptable method. (2) What range of accuracy is desirable Should the sample be collected by a procedure that is 5% accurate, or should a statistical technique be used on data from eight tests at 10% accuracy Costs of different test methods will certainly be a consideration here. (3) Which sampling and analytical methods are available that will give the required accuracy for the estimated concentration An Orsat gas analyzer with a sensitivity limit of 0.02% would not be chosen to sample carbon monoxide... 

Because of the complex nature of the discharge conditions, GD-OES is a comparative analytical method and standard reference materials must be used to establish a unique relationship between the measured line intensities and the elemental concentration. In quantitative bulk analysis, which has been developed to very high standards, calibration is performed with a set of calibration samples of composition similar to the unknown samples. Normally, a major element is used as reference and the internal standard method is applied. This approach is not generally applicable in depth-profile analysis, because the different layers encountered in a depth profile of ten comprise widely different types of material which means that a common reference element is not available. 

Atomic Absorption An analytical method in which the sample is converted into a vapor by passing it through a flame or other energy source and the absorbance at a particular wavelength is measured and compared with that of a reference substance. The absorbance measured is proportional to the concentration ot that substance in the sample. 

The rehability of these analytical methods may be questionable when chemical shift differences of derivatives are of the same magnitude as variations encountered from solvent, concentration, and temperature influences. Reported fluorine chemical shift ranges for tnfluoroacetylated alcohols (1 ppm), p-fluorobenzoylated sterols (1 ppm), and p-fluorobenzoylated ammo acids (0.5 ppm) are quite narrow, and correct interpretation of the fluonne NMR spectra of these denvatized mixmres requires strict adherence to standardized sampling procedure and NMR parameters. 

The contemporary chromatograph used for analytical purposes is a very complex instrument that may operate at pressures up to 10,000 p.s.i.and provide flow rates that range from a few microliters per minute to 10 or 20 ml/minute. Solutes can be detected easily at concentration levels as low as lxlO-9 g/ml and a complete analysis can be carried out on a few micrograms of sample in a few minutes. The range of liquid chromatographs that is available extends from the relatively simple and inexpensive instrument, suitable for the majority of routine analyses, to the very elaborate and expensive machines that are more appropriate for analytical method development. 

Other features of an analytical method that should be borne in mind are its linear range, which should be as large as possible to allow samples containing a wide range of analyte concentrations to be analysed without further manipulation, and its precision and accuracy. Method development and validation require all of these parameters to be studied and assessed quantitatively. 

Reliable analytical methods are available for determination of many volatile nitrosamines at concentrations of 0.1 to 10 ppb in a variety of environmental and biological samples. Most methods employ distillation, extraction, an optional cleanup step, concentration, and final separation by gas chromatography (GC). Use of the highly specific Thermal Energy Analyzer (TEA) as a GC detector affords simplification of sample handling and cleanup without sacrifice of selectivity or sensitivity. Mass spectrometry (MS) is usually employed to confirm the identity of nitrosamines. Utilization of the mass spectrometer s capability to provide quantitative data affords additional confirmatory evidence and quantitative confirmation should be a required criterion of environmental sample analysis. Artifactual formation of nitrosamines continues to be a problem, especially at low levels (0.1 to 1 ppb), and precautions must be taken, such as addition of sulfamic acid or other nitrosation inhibitors. The efficacy of measures for prevention of artifactual nitrosamine formation should be evaluated in each type of sample examined. 

---