Analytical chemists development

When a method is being developed, it is important that the analytical chemists developing the methods be cognizant of the laboratory conditions in which the methods will be conducted in a quality control setting. 

Analytical method. The most serious errors are those in the method itself. Examples of method errors include (1) incomplete reaction for chemical methods, (2) unexpected interferences from the sample itself or reagents used, (3) having the analyte in the wrong oxidation state for the measurement, (4) loss of analyte during sample preparation by volatilization or precipitation, and (5) an error in calculation based on incorrect assumptions in the procedure (errors can evolve from assignment of an incorrect formula or molecular weight to the sample). Most analytical chemists developing a method check all the compounds likely to be present in the sample to see if they interfere with the determination of the analyte unlikely interferences may not have been checked. Once a vahd method is developed, an SOP for the method should be written so that it is performed the same way every time it is run. 

Finally, though not less important, is the fact that SAM is an empirical tool that analytical chemists developed to take account of a serious practical problem. But it will not appear in any statistical textbook. The reason is that somehow chemists create a situation where an artificial signal (jo=0) gives rise to a theoretical concentration (which even in most papers and textbooks is negative and it is converted subjectively to a more convenient positive value ). Hence, serious problems arise from a statistical point of view when attempting accurately to define the variance associated with such a prediction. There will not be exact mathematical solutions, and different approaches (all of them approximately, but not totally, correct) can be considered. This will have important consequences in the calculation of the confidence intervals, as will be shown next. 

You will come across numerous examples of qualitative and quantitative methods in this text, most of which are routine examples of chemical analysis. It is important to remember, however, that nonroutine problems prompted analytical chemists to develop these methods. Whenever possible, we will try to place these methods in their appropriate historical context. In addition, examples of current research problems in analytical chemistry are scattered throughout the text. 

Finally, the textbook concludes with two chapters discussing the design and maintenance of analytical methods, two topics of importance to analytical chemists. Chapter 14 considers the development of an analytical method, including its optimization, verification, and validation. Quality control and quality assessment are discussed in Chapter 15. 

In the United States the analytical methods approved by most states are ones developed under the auspices of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) (3). Penalties for analytical deviation from guaranteed analyses vary, even from state to state within the United States (4). The legally accepted analytical procedures, in general, detect the solubiUty of nitrogen and potassium in water and the solubiUty of phosphoms in a specified citrate solution. Some very slowly soluble nutrient sources, particularly of nitrogen, are included in some specialty fertilizers such as turf fertilizers. The slow solubihty extends the period of effectiveness and reduces leaching losses. In these cases, the proportion and nature of the specialty source must be detailed on the labeling. 

Initially, there was some ovedap on proposed analytical methods to accomplish a particular analysis. The Association of Official Analytical Chemists (AOAC) methods and Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) methods in some cases dupHcated ASTA methods, but the procedures differed. Most spice companies, particulady those who are members of ASTA, use ASTA recommended methods. In an attempt to ensure that equivalent specifications are reported, the Technical Group of ASTA develops specifications and in some cases recommends that a BAM or AO AC method be used. 

Hyphenated analytical methods usually give rise to iacreased confidence ia results, eaable the handling of more complex samples, improve detectioa limits, and minimi2e method development time. This approach normally results ia iacreased iastmmeatal complexity and cost, iacreased user sophisticatioa, and the need to handle enormous amounts of data. The analytical chemist must, however, remain cogni2ant of the need to use proper analytical procedures ia sample preparatioas to aid ia improved seasitivity and not rely solely on additional iastmmentation to iacrease detection levels. 

The analytical research and development (R D) unit is often responsible for the preparation and vahdation of test methods. The R D lab is not faced with the same pressures for rapid analysis as the QC unit, where pending results often hold up production. In addition, R D often assigns personnel to specific instmments or techniques, whereas QC generally requires technicians to perform varied analyses. This leads to an expertise on the part of analytical chemists and technicians which is difficult to duphcate in QC. Therefore the R D test method should be mgged enough to withstand the different environment of the QC lab and stiU provide vahd results. 

G. Wemimont, in W. Spendley, ed.. Use of Statistics to Develop andEvaluate Analytical Methods, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington, Va., 1985. 

Again with the analytical chemist in mind, we have not treated all topics equally. The electronics expert is likely to feel we have skimped, especially in Chapter 2 Chapter 4 is oversimplified statisticians will find much missing from Chapter 10 and other important developments could have been treated in Chapters 9 and 11. 

The scope of my comments will cover not the development of analytical methods but rather the process of choosing methods which give useful answers to the questions posed by the research chemist, the process engineer or the product marketing manager. The analytical chemist is always faced with the paranoia causing problem of not being able to be confident in a purity measurement until it can be shown that impurities do not interfere. 

The PSP toxins represent a real challenge to the analytical chemist interested in developing a method for their detection. There are a great variety of closely related toxin structures (Figure 1) and the need exists to determine the level of each individually. They are totally non-volatile and lack any useful UV absorption. These characteristics coupled with the very low levels found in most samples (sub-ppm) eliminates most traditional chromatographic techniques such as GC and HPLC with UVA S detection. However, by the conversion of the toxins to fluorescent derivatives (J), the problem of detection of the toxins is solved. It has been found that the fluorescent technique is highly sensitive and specific for PSP toxins and many of the current analytical methods for the toxins utilize fluorescent detection. With the toxin detection problem solved, the development of a useful HPLC method was possible and somewhat straightforward. 

The following physico-chemical properties of the analyte(s) are important in method development considerations vapor pressure, ultraviolet (UV) absorption spectrum, solubility in water and in solvents, dissociation constant(s), n-octanol/water partition coefficient, stability vs hydrolysis and possible thermal, photo- or chemical degradation. These valuable data enable the analytical chemist to develop the most promising analytical approach, drawing from the literature and from his or her experience with related analytical problems, as exemplified below. Gas chromatography (GC) methods, for example, require a measurable vapor pressure and a certain thermal stability as the analytes move as vaporized molecules within the mobile phase. On the other hand, compounds that have a high vapor pressure will require careful extract concentration by evaporation of volatile solvents. 

However, now and then analytical chemists feel uneasy with such kinds of definitions which do not reflect completely the identity and independence of analytical chemistry. Chemists of other branches (inorganic, organic, and physical chemists) as well as physicists and bioscientists also obtain information on inanimate or living matter using and developing high-performance analytical instruments just as analytical chemists do. 

Demonstrating the progress in an interdisciplinary field of research and development, this book is primarily addressed to specialists with different background -physicists, organic and analytical chemists, and photochemists - to those who develop and apply new fluorescence reporters. It will also be useful to specialists in bioanalysis and biomedical diagnostics - the areas where these techniques are most extensively used. 

We shall also outline how bond distances and information pertaining to the distribution of electron density may, in principle, be extracted from measurements carried out using electron microscopy. Finally we touch upon future possible lines of development likely to be of value to the inorganic, surface and analytical chemist. 

After five years as an analyst, Vicki moved within LGC to work on the DTI-funded Valid Analytical Measurement (VAM) programme. In this role, she was responsible for providing advice and developing guidance on method validation, measurement uncertainty and statistics. One of her key projects involved the development of approaches for evaluating the uncertainty in results obtained from chemical test methods. During this time, Vicki also became involved with the development and delivery of training courses on topics such as method validation, measurement uncertainty, quality systems and statistics for analytical chemists. 

---