Analytical chemists, interests

The PSP toxins represent a real challenge to the analytical chemist interested in developing a method for their detection. There are a great variety of closely related toxin structures (Figure 1) and the need exists to determine the level of each individually. They are totally non-volatile and lack any useful UV absorption. These characteristics coupled with the very low levels found in most samples (sub-ppm) eliminates most traditional chromatographic techniques such as GC and HPLC with UVA S detection. However, by the conversion of the toxins to fluorescent derivatives (J), the problem of detection of the toxins is solved. It has been found that the fluorescent technique is highly sensitive and specific for PSP toxins and many of the current analytical methods for the toxins utilize fluorescent detection. With the toxin detection problem solved, the development of a useful HPLC method was possible and somewhat straightforward. 

A second aspect of analytical methodology that concerns me is the lack of suitable standards. In my laboratory and certainly in many other laboratories the application of HPLC, glass capillary GC, and glass capillary GC-mass spectrometry-computer systems allows us to separate relatively easily hundreds of individual aromatic compounds, e.g., 9 to 12 isomers of C-3 phenanthrenes. However, there are no commercial sources for standards to verify our identifications or calibrate the quantification of these compounds. Synthesis of all isomers is clearly a monumental task. In the interim, perhaps the analytical chemists interested in this problem should be encouraged to develop systematic rules for interpreting glass capillary GC and HPLC retention indices, subtle mass spectral differences, and UV-fluorescence spectra. 

The response surfaces in Figure 14.2 are plotted for a limited range of factor levels (0 < A < 10, 0 < B < 10), but can be extended toward more positive or more negative values. This is an example of an unconstrained response surface. Most response surfaces of interest to analytical chemists, however, are naturally constrained by the nature of the factors or the response or are constrained by practical limits set by the analyst. The response surface in Figure 14.1, for example, has a natural constraint on its factor since the smallest possible concentration for the analyte is zero. Furthermore, an upper limit exists because it is usually undesirable to extrapolate a calibration curve beyond the highest concentration standard. 

The commercial availability of ionic liquids is thus a key factor for the actual success of ionic liquid methodology. Apart from the matter of lowering the activation barrier for those synthetic chemists interested in entering the field, it allows access to ionic liquids for those communities that do not traditionally focus on synthetic work. Physical chemists, engineers, electrochemists, and scientists interested in developing new analytical tools are among those who have already developed many new exciting applications by use of ionic liquids [11]. 

Element-selective detectors. Many samples, e.g. those originating from environmental studies, contain so many constituent compounds that the gas chromatogram obtained is a complex array of peaks. For the analytical chemist, who may be interested in only a few of the compounds present, the replacement of the essentially non-selective type of detector (i.e. thermal conductivity, flame ionisation, etc.) by a system which responds selectively to some property of certain of the eluted species may overcome this problem. 

The diversity and the effectiveness of the means for coping with deviations from proportionality attest the great interest in x-ray emission spectrography and the resourcefulness of the analytical chemist. Only representative references can be cited. The methods used to ensure reliable results in the face of the three classes of deviations are described briefly below. The obvious measure of separating the element to be determined from the matrix is omitted. 

There is no single LC-MS interface that is ideally suited for all compounds of interest to analytical chemists. It is evident that LC-APCI-MS and LC-PB-MS are currently the LC-MS methods most frequently used for polymer/additive analysis. The two techniques are compared in Table 7.69. When PB and API interfacing techniques are used, much more structural information can be obtained, and unambiguous identification... 

Redox-inactive cations attract a particular interest for analytical chemists because of their importance in environmental control, industry, and medicine. For instance, in clinical diagnostics, tests for blood electrolytes (Na+, K+) are routine, because deviation of cation content from their normal values indicates a number of pathologies. 

It is unfortunate that many analytical chemists are required to work in laboratories which are far from suitable for the type of tests that they are required to perform. This can ultimately influence the quality of the results they produce. There are a number of factors that may influence the quality of analytical work. One important factor is that when a sample is being analysed to detect, e.g. very small amounts of the analyte of interest, it is essential to avoid all other sources of the analyte and other potentially interfering species which might contaminate the sample and distort the result. 

We hope the book will be of interest to a broad audience of analytical chemists, environmental chemists, water managers, operators and technologists working in the field. 

If it were possible to identify or quantitatively determine any element or compound by simple measurement no matter what its concentration or the complexity of the matrix, separation techniques would be of no value to the analytical chemist. Most procedures fall short of this ideal because of interference with the required measurement by other constituents of the sample. Many techniques for separating and concentrating the species of interest have thus been devised. Such techniques are aimed at exploiting differences in physico-chemical properties between the various components of a mixture. Volatility, solubility, charge, molecular size, shape and polarity are the most useful in this respect. A change of phase, as occurs during distillation, or the formation of a new phase, as in precipitation, can provide a simple means of isolating a desired component. Usually, however, more complex separation procedures are required for multi-component samples. Most depend on the selective transfer of materials between two immiscible phases. The most widely used techniques and the phase systems associated with them are summarized in Table 4.1. 

However, as Kok 1) stated in his thesis, chromatographers and electro-analytical chemists seem to belong to different species . Chromatographers usually have very little interest in the processes that are involved in detection as long as reproducible and meaningful signals are obtained. 

The use of infra-red or ultraviolet spectroscopy to examine the molecular groups present in a chemical compound is familiar to any chemist. One of the main uses of this technique is to apply a range of electromagnetic frequencies to a sample and thus identify the frequency at which a process occurs. This can be characteristic of, say, the stretch of a carbonyl group or an electronic transition in a metal complex. The frequency, wavelength or wavenumber at which an absorption occurs is of most interest to an analytical chemist. In order to use this information quantitatively, for example to establish the concentration of a molecule present in a sample, the Beer-Lambert law is used ... 

There is everlasting controversy and everlasting cooperation between analytical chemists dealing with chromatography. Academic research is generally not interested in the solution of practical problems, only with the theory of separation, with the development of new separation processes and with the mathematically based explanation of retention behaviour. 

Stan Van Den Berg is a Professor of Chemical Oceanography at the University of Liverpool. His research interests focus on the chemical specia-tion of trace elements and organic compounds in natural waters and the redox chemistry of metals and sulfides. His research group has pioneered advances in analytical techniques using electroanalytical methods (cathodic stripping voltammetry and chronopotentiometry). Dr. Van Den Berg is a broad-based analytical chemist. 

From the general audience came this comment "Instruments today are not too compatible to transfer information. There is the RS-232 port with its 8-bit code and all sorts of hand shaking and lines to be hooked up properly. It is just difficult to set up. And as we have already said in this panel discussion, "There are not adequate conventions for data communication and transportability. I think that the answer to that is that the analytical chemist and these people who are interested in that sort of data exchange will have to become extremely active in this area to reflect the needs of the user. ... 

It is critical when performing quantitative GC/MS procedures that appropriate internal standards are employed to account for variations in extraction efficiency, derivatization, injection volume, and matrix effects. For isotope dilution (ID) GC/MS analyses, it is crucial to select an appropriate internal standard. Ideally, the internal standard should have the same physical and chemical properties as the analyte of interest, but will be separated by mass. The best internal standards are nonradioactive stable isotopic analogs of the compounds of interest, differing by at least 3, and preferably by 4 or 5, atomic mass units. The only property that distinguishes the analyte from the internal standard in ID is a very small difference in mass, which is readily discerned by the mass spectrometer. Isotopic dilution procedures are among the most accurate and precise quantitative methods available to analytical chemists. It cannot be emphasized too strongly that internal standards of the same basic structure compensate for matrix effects in MS. Therefore, in the ID method, there is an absolute reference (i.e., the response factors of the analyte and the internal standard are considered to be identical Pickup and McPherson, 1976). 

---