Analyte reduction

Nano-electrode arrays can be formed through nano-structuring of the electrocatalyst on an inert electrode support. Indeed, if the current of the analyte reduction (oxidation) on a blank electrode is negligible compared to the activity of the electrocatalyst, the former can be considered as an insulator surface. Hence, for the synthesis of nanoelectrode arrays one has to carry out material nano-structuring. Recently, an elegant approach [140] for the electrosynthesis of mesoporous nano-structured surfaces by depositioning different metals (Pt, Pd, Co, Sn) through lyotropic liquid crystalline phases has been proposed [141-143],... 

There has been a long-standing and unfruitful opposition between reductionist and holistic science in connection with agricultural and ecological research (see e.g. Lockeretz and Anderson 1993, Thompson 1995, Rowe 1997), which has hampered cross-disciplinary cooperation. From the holistic view, analytic, reductive methods are necessarily reductionist and are therefore bad science because they do not capture the connectedness of complex reality. Furthermore they are (at least in part) to blame for the present agricultural and environmental problems. From the reductionist view, analytic, reductive methods ensure the objectivity of science, and other methods are, therefore, not scientific. 

The scheme used to determine oxidizing agents involves adding an unmeasured excess of potassium iodide to a slightly acidic solution of the analyte. Reduction of the analyte produces a stoichiometrically equivalent amount of iodine. The liberated iodine is then titrated with a standard solution of sodium thiosulfate, Na2S203, one of the few reducing agents that is stable toward air oxidation. An example of this procedure is the determination of sodium hypochlorite in bleaches. The reactions are... 

There is little information about analytical reduction of sulphonamides. A test was given... 

This decomposition (formally called analytic reduction) assumes that the separation is feasible that is, each component or subsystem operates independently, and analysis results are not distorted when these components are considered separately. This assumption in turn imphes that the components or events are not subject to feedback loops and other nonlinear interactions and that the behavior of the components is the same when examined singly as when they are playing their part in the whole. A third fundamental assumption is that the principles governing the assembling of the components into the whole are straightforward, that is, the interactions... 

These are reasonable assumptions, it turns out, for many of the physical regularities of the universe. System theorists have described these systems as displaying organized simplicity (figure 3.1) [207]. Such systems can be separated into non-interacting subsystems for analysis purposes the precise nature of the component interactions is known and interactions can be examined pairwise. Analytic reduction has been highly effective in physics and is embodied in structural mechanics. 

Systems theory provides a much better foundation for safety engineering than the classic analytic reduction approach underlying event-based models of accidents. It provides a way forward to much more powerful and effective safety and risk analysis and management procedures that handle the inadequacies and needed extensions to current practice described in chapter 2. 

The analytic reduction of the two-phase front motion presented in this section reduces the complexity of computing the slow transients by several orders of magnitude, switching the timescale dichotomy from a obstacle to an asset. The inclusion of multiphase water management in models of stacks of 50-200 unit cells used for automotive applications see [2], would seem certain to require a reduction along these lines. 

Thus, in practice, amperometric detection involving analyte reduction is generally carried out by application of negative potentials, while analyte oxidation requires the use of relatively positive applied potentials. Successful bench-scale CE/EC in the amperometric mode requires the accurate maintenance of EC potentials on the order of roughly 1 V at working electrodes placed in CE fields on the order of 5-30 kV and the measurement of EC currents typically pA in magnitude in the presence of pA-level background CE currents. 

Under such conditions transfer of the analyte from the bulk solution to the electrode surface is principally by diffusion. A typical DC polarogram is presented in Figure 1. The half wave potential (Eyx) is characteristic of the analyte and hence yields qualitative analytical data. The analyte reduction current, produced at the electrode surface, is the limiting diffusion current (U) which is proportional to the concentration of the analyte in the solution, hence providing the quantitative information. Calibration is performed by internal standard additions or the construction of a calibration curve. 

As part of the Megacity Initiative Local and Global Research Observations (MILAGRO) project, a comprehensive airborne study by Yokelson et al. reported the first detailed field measurements of biomass emissions in the Northern Hemisphere tropics [169]. Volatile emissions were measured from 20 deforestation and crop residue fires on the Yucatan peninsula. This included two trace gases which are often considered to be useful as indicators of biomass burning. One we have discussed before, namely acetonitrile, and the other is hydrogen cyanide. A variety of instrumentation was co-deployed for this investigation (FTIR spectroscopy, GD-FID, a GC-Trace Analytical Reduction Gas Detector, fluorescence and chemiluminescence instruments and various other spectrometers). PTR-MS was used to monitor methanol, acetonitrile, acetaldehyde, acetone, methyl ethyl ketone, methyl propanal, hydroxyacetone plus methyl acetate, benzene and 13 other volatile species. 

In the presence of many metal ions, diorthohydroxyazo dyes exhibit two polarographic reduction waves, the first due to free dye and the second to metal-dye complex. Highly sensitive analytical methods based on this principle have been developed for example, Ni or Fe may be determined in the presence of an excess of aluminum thank to thiazolylazo derivatives (563). 

Several types of reactions are commonly used in analytical procedures, either in preparing samples for analysis or during the analysis itself. The most important of these are precipitation reactions, acid-base reactions, complexation reactions, and oxidation-reduction reactions. In this section we review these reactions and their equilibrium constant expressions. 

In electrogravimetry the analyte is deposited as a solid film on one electrode in an electrochemical cell. The oxidation of Pb +, and its deposition as Pb02 on a Pt anode is one example of electrogravimetry. Reduction also may be used in electrogravimetry. The electrodeposition of Cu on a Pt cathode, for example, provides a direct analysis for Cu +. 

A titration in which the reaction between the analyte and titrant is an oxidation/reduction reaction. 

The percentage of current that actually leads to the analyte s oxidation or reduction. 

In coulometry, current and time are measured, and equation 11.24 or equation 11.25 is used to calculate Q. Equation 11.23 is then used to determine the moles of analyte. To obtain an accurate value for N, therefore, all the current must result in the analyte s oxidation or reduction. In other words, coulometry requires 100% current efficiency (or an accurately measured current efficiency established using a standard), a factor that must be considered in designing a coulometric method of analysis. 

Controlled-potential coulometry also can be applied to the quantitative analysis of organic compounds, although the number of applications is significantly less than that for inorganic analytes. One example is the six-electron reduction of a nitro group, -NO2, to a primary amine, -NH2, at a mercury electrode. Solutions of picric acid, for instance, can be analyzed by reducing to triaminophenol. 

Controllcd-Currcnt Coulomctry The use of a mediator makes controlled-current coulometry a more versatile analytical method than controlled-potential coulome-try. For example, the direct oxidation or reduction of a protein at the working electrode in controlled-potential coulometry is difficult if the protein s active redox site lies deep within its structure. The controlled-current coulometric analysis of the protein is made possible, however, by coupling its oxidation or reduction to a mediator that is reduced or oxidized at the working electrode. Controlled-current coulometric methods have been developed for many of the same analytes that may be determined by conventional redox titrimetry. These methods, several of which are summarized in Table 11.9, also are called coulometric redox titrations. 

Coupling the mediator s oxidation or reduction to an acid-base, precipitation, or complexation reaction involving the analyte allows for the coulometric titration of analytes that are not easily oxidized or reduced. For example, when using H2O as a mediator, oxidation at the anode produces H3O+... 

If the oxidation or reduction of H2O is carried out externally using the generator cell shown in Figure 11.25, then H3O+ or OH can be dispensed selectively into a solution containing a basic or acidic analyte. The resulting reaction is identical to that in an acid-base titration. Coulometric acid-base titrations have been used for... 

Sensitivity For a coulometric method of analysis, the calibration sensitivity is equivalent to tiF in equation 11.25. In general, coulometric methods in which the analyte s oxidation or reduction involves a larger value of n show a greater sensitivity. 

Sign Conventions Since the reaction of interest occurs at the working electrode, the classification of current is based on this reaction. A current due to the analyte s reduction is called a cathodic current and, by convention, is considered positive. Anodic currents are due to oxidation reactions and carry a negative value. 

Residual Current Even in the absence of analyte, a small current inevitably flows through an electrochemical cell. This current, which is called the residual current, consists of two components a faradaic current due to the oxidation or reduction of trace impurities, and the charging current. Methods for discriminating between the faradaic current due to the analyte and the residual current are discussed later in this chapter. 

Correcting for Residual Current In any quantitative analysis the signal due to the analyte must be corrected for signals arising from other sources. The total measured current in any voltammetric experiment, itot> consists of two parts that due to the analyte s oxidation or reduction, and a background, or residual, current, ir. 

In stripping voltammetry the analyte is first deposited on the electrode, usually as the result of an oxidation or reduction reaction. The potential is then scanned, either linearly or by using potential pulses, in a direction that removes the analyte by a reduction or oxidation reaction. 

The concentration of chromic acid can be determined from its reduction by alcohols under conditions when the kinetics are pseudo-first-order in analyte. One approach is to monitor the absorbance of the solution at a wavelength of 355 nm. A standard solution of 5.1 X lO " M chromic acid yields absorbances of 0.855 and 0.709 at, 100 s and 300 s, respectively, after the reaction s initiation. When a sample with an unknown amount of chromic acid is analyzed under... 

---