Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Aerial application equipment

At Eglin AFB, Florida, the U.S. Air Force initiated an experiment in 1962 to test aerial application equipment for deposition of defoliants... [Pg.112]

Aerial application equipment should be calibrated as follows ... [Pg.995]

As a result of its use as an insecticide on cotton, fruit trees, vegetables, and other crops, methyl parathion is released directly to the atmosphere during application. It is applied primarily by spraying from aircraft or ground equipment (NPIRS 1986). Aerial application of methyl parathion to agricultural fields releases the insecticide to the air. [Pg.147]

For this purpose an elaborate testing Installation, designed to measure deposition parameters, was established on the Eglln Reservation with the place of direct aerial application restricted to an area of approximately 3 km within Test Area C-52A In the southeastern part of the reservation. Massive quantities of herbicides, used In the testing of aerial defoliation spray equipment from 1962 through 1970, were released and fell within the Instrumented test area. The uniqueness of the area prompted the United States Air Force to set aside the area In 1970 for research Investigations. Numerous ecological surveys have been conducted since 1970. As a result, the ecosystem of this unique site has been well studied and documented (2,3). [Pg.162]

The ground application was made with a tractor equipped with a rear mounted boom sprayer. The aerial applications were made with a- helicopter equipped with a boom. The hand-gun applications were made with a commercial high pressure hose-nozzle sprayer. [Pg.85]

The aerial applicators also had considerably less exposure than the mixer-loaders. Again, most of this exposure was to the hands and was acquired from adjusting nozzles on the spray equipment. For the 80S and the XLR formulations, the total HDE s were 7.4 and 3.4 mg/h, respectively, and almost 100% of the exposure was to the hands in both cases. Here, as for the ground application, the highest HDE was obtained from Sevimol-4 because of the more frequent plugging of the spray nozzels. Thus the total HDE for Sevimol-4 was 26.5 mg/h, and the HDE on the hands was 25.7 mg/h. [Pg.98]

During one aerial application with XLR (experiment 4) the spray equipment malfunctioned. The applicator, in an attempt to correct the problem, accidently opened the dumping valve to the spray tank and the formulation splashed on him. The result was a total HDE of 367 mg/h, with almost half of it on the forearms. Since such an exposure would not be continuous, the calculation on an hourly basis is unrealistic. Therefore, the data were not used in determining the HDE to applicators. [Pg.98]

The heavy rates of application of such materials as lead or calcium arsenate, was ill suited to the type of application equipment then available. It must be remembered that aerial application of chemicals in forestry came with the improved planes after World War II. Rotenone and pyrethrum, two insecticides used in agriculture in that era, had but limited applicability in forestry because of their properties (10). [Pg.8]

One kilogram of fibers was mixed with Bio Tac 3 as a sticker. Specially designed equipment was used for aerial application. [Pg.236]

Because little agitation of the spray suspension is needed, emulsifiable concentrates are especially suitable for low-pressure, low-volume sprayers and for mist blowers. You can also use them with many other types of application equipment, including dilute hydraulic sprayers, low-volume ground sprayers, mist blowers, and low-volume aerial sprayers. [Pg.116]

Akesson, N.B., in "What s Happening in Aerial Application Research" Yates, W.E. Cowden, personal communication. Wilce, S.E., in "Drop Size Control and Aircraft Spray Equipment" Akesson, N.B. Yates, W.E. Christensen, P. Cowden, R.E. Hudson, D.C. Weigt, G.I. Agricultural Aviation, 1974 Vol. 16 (1), p. 7-16. [Pg.508]

Some of the characteristics of the aerial application cited in section 1 (Aircraft model and kind of crop protection procedure), can make the WBV exposure variable. Different aircraft may have significant differences, either in structure or in the interface with the pilot. Different crop protection procedures need different equipment installed in the aircraft. In addition, different cycle times is performed (for each takeoff), changing the time that the aircraft meets the ground. Thus, these characteristics can influence the WBV supported by the pilots. [Pg.115]

For commercial production, the BT cells are grown in large fermentors in complex media that support high cell densities and ultimate sporulation of the cells. Cell lysis releases the spores and crystals into the growth medium, and they are recovered by either centrifugation or other techniques that concentrate the particulates. Depending on the desired formulation, the concentrate is either spray-dried and formulated into wettable powder or oil flowable, or formulated directly from concentrate into an aqueous flowable. Application is with standard spray equipment, either ground or aerial. [Pg.260]

Other important sources of direct pollution of rivers are the wastes from the industrial production plants for pesticides, wastes from households, and from the cleaning of application machinery and auxiliary equipment. Particularly harmful is aerial spraying, in which 50-75% of pesticides can fall outside the target zone. [Pg.133]

Extensive notes should be taken in the following areas wind and climatic conditions, duration of study, kind and amounts of material used, type of equipment used, all application parameters (nozzle size and type, height above canopy if aerial) and, as mentioned earlier, all irregularities with regard to the application. [Pg.168]

In addition, this section specifically addresses the requirements for vehicle-mounted elevating and rotating work platforms. It specifically states "Unless otherwise provided in this section, aerial devices (aerial lifts) acquired on or after July 1,1975, shall be designed and constructed in conformance with the applicable requirements of the American National Standard for Vehicle-Mounted Elevating and Rotating Notk Platforms, ANSI A92.2-1969, including appendix." The employee training, personal protective equipment required, boom operation around electrical hazards, and inspection and maintenance of equipment are also discussed. [Pg.407]

Aerial lifts may be field modified for uses other than those intended by the manufacturer provided the modification has been certified in writing by the manufacturer or by any other equivalent entity, such as a nationally recognized testing laboratory, to be in conformity with all applicable provisions of ANSI A92.2-1969 and this section and to be at least as safe as the equipment was before modification. [Pg.513]

Scissor lifts, including those with platforms that extend beyond the equipment s wheelbase, do not fall within any of these categories. Therefore, scissor lifts are not addressed by the aerial lift provisions of Subpart L. While there are no OSHA provisions that specifically address scissor lifts, they do meet the definition of a scaffold in 1926.451, general requirements for scaffolds. Employers must therefore comply with the other applicable provisions of Subpart L when using scissor lifts. For example, since scissor lifts are mobile, the specific requirements for mobile scaffolds in the scaffold standard ( 1926.452(w)—mobile scaffolds) must be met. [Pg.1396]


See other pages where Aerial application equipment is mentioned: [Pg.306]    [Pg.306]    [Pg.849]    [Pg.98]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.198]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.17]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.217]    [Pg.82]    [Pg.4]    [Pg.75]    [Pg.420]    [Pg.509]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.950]    [Pg.177]    [Pg.83]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.1559]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.979]    [Pg.757]    [Pg.907]    [Pg.26]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.995 ]




SEARCH



Aerial application

© 2024 chempedia.info