Effluent absorbance monitoring

The electron capture detector is the result of a series of developments which were initiated in 1951 by D. J. Pompeo and J. W. Otvos (14) of the Shell Company s development laboratory in California. The device they invented was a beta-ray ionization cross-section detector (Section 5.8). Deal et al. (15) at the Shell laboratory in California and Boer (16) in Amsterdam modified the detector, used originally to monitor effluents of a large scale plant process, for applications in GC. From the limited success of the detector. Lovelock (17) produced the beta-ray argon detector in 1958 (Section 5.8). This modification substituted argon as the carrier gas and placed a potential of 1000 V across the electrodes. Argon passing between the electrodes absorbed radiation and formed a metastable species with energy (11.6 eV) sufficient to ionize most substances. Proposed mechanisms for this process are ... 

Personnel are protected in working with tritium primarily by containment of all active material. Containment devices such as process lines and storage media are normally placed in well-ventilated secondary enclosures (hoods or process rooms). The ventilating air is monitored and released through tall stacks environmental tritium is limited to safe levels by atmospheric dilution of the stack effluent. Tritium can be efficiently removed from air streams by catalytic oxidation followed by water adsorption on a microporous soHd absorbent (80) (see Absorption). 

Separated components emerging in the column effluent can be monitored by means of a physical measurement, e.g. UV or visible absorbance, refractive index, conductivity or radioactivity. Alternatively, separate fractions can be collected automatically and subjected to further analysis. 

Detector Compatibility A solvent must be carefully chosen to avoid interference with the detector. Most UV detectors monitor the column effluent at 254 nm. Any UV-absorbing solvent, such as benzene or olefins, would be unacceptable because of high background. Since refractometer detectors monitor the difference in refractive index between solvent and column effluent, a greater difference leads to greater ability to detect the solute. 

Radiation absorption monitoring of the column effluent at an appropriate wavelength provides the most versatile means of detection for the fat-soluble vitamins. Vitamins A, D, E, and K exhibit characteristic absorption spectra in the UV region, whereas the carotenoid pigments absorb light in the visible region. 

Two UV detectors are also available from Laboratory Data Control, the UV Monitor and the Duo Monitor. The UV Monitor (Fig.3.45) consists of an optical unit anda control unit. The optical unit contains the UV source (low-pressure mercury lamp), sample, reference cells and photodetector. The control unit is connected by cable to the optical unit and may be located at a distance of up to 25 ft. The dual quartz flow cells (path-length, 10 mm diameter, 1 mm) each have a capacity of 8 (i 1. Double-beam linear-absorbance measurements may be made at either 254 nm or 280 nm. The absorbance ranges vary from 0.01 to 0.64 optical density units full scale (ODFS). The minimum detectable absorbance (equivalent to the noise) is 0.001 optical density units (OD). The drift of the photometer is usually less than 0.002 OD/h. With this system, it is possible to monitor continuously and quantitatively the absorbance at 254 or 280 nm of one liquid stream or the differential absorbance between two streams. The absorbance readout is linear and is directly related to the concentration in accordance with Beer s law. In the 280 nm mode, the 254-nm light is converted by a phosphor into a band with a maximum at 280 nm. This light is then passed to a photodetector which is sensitized for a response at 280 nm. The Duo Monitor (Fig.3.46) is a dual-wavelength continuous-flow detector with which effluents can be monitored simultaneously at 254 nm and 280 nm. The system consists of two modules, and the principle of operation is based on a modification of the 280-nm conversion kit for the UV Monitor. Light of 254-nm wavelength from a low-pressure mercury lamp is partially converted by the phosphor into a band at 280 nm. 

As with MID on MS, the more wavelengths that are simultaneously monitored, the greater is the likelihood of valid identification. Another analytical technique is the formation of derivatives which are fluorescent or absorb UV radiation at unique wavelengths. The compound of interest may be derivatized and injected onto the HPLC system the column separates the reactants and then passes them through the detector. The compound may also be derivatized "post column" as done by amino acid analyzers. The de-rivatizing reactant is metered to mix with the column effluent and is then sent to the detector. Ideally, only the derivatized products should be detectable. 

The analytical separation was obtained at low flow velocity (0.2 cm/sec) and in the isocratic mode to optimize resolution. Absorbance detectors set at 245 and 280nm respectively, were used in series for effluent monitoring. 215nm detection, though optimum for the cannabinoids, was precluded due to co-elution of en-... 

One major obstacle to effective use of UV monitoring of HPLC effluent in the range of 200-220 nm was solvent incompatibility. Two types of incompatibilities were noted 1) impurities in the solvent 2) solvent functional group absorbance, i.e. UV cutoff. The former incompatibility was easily overcome by using high quality solvents from the same lot. Solvent functional group absorbance proved to be the more difficult of the two incompatibilities. 

Uses of high-resolution analytical systems in other types of research can also be envisioned. For example, the molecular pollutants, especially the refractory organic compounds, in the effluents of sanitary sewage plants have not been well established. Preliminary results from analysis of primary and secondary effluents from conventional sanitary sewage plants show that up to 80 UV-absorbing constituents can be monitored by the UV-analyzer (Fig. 21). Obviously, such analytical systems would be useful in monitoring the effectiveness of various processing steps. 

Breakthrough volume can be measured by monitoring the ultraviolet (UV) signal of a water sample spiked with traces of a solute, 5, which has an initial absorbance, Aq. The spiked sample is passed through an SPE column. If the compound is retained by the sorbent, the effluent will have an absorbance of zero. A frontal or breakthrough curve is recorded (Fig. 4.9) beginning at a volume, V/, usually defined as 1 % of Aq, up to a volume of V, defined as 99% of Aq, where the effluent has the same composition as the spiked water sample (Hennion and Pichon, 1994). 

Recording breakthrough curves is time consuming and reading at 1 % of A is difficult and not always accurate. Moreover, the sample should be spiked at a trace level in order to not overload the sorbent, and the UV signal of the effluent should be monitored at low absorbances, which leads to problems with baseline drift and poor reproducibility. Moreover, some compounds have low UV absorbances. 

---