Water quality classification

The author is grateful to the BEWA for the use of their Water Quality Classification as Tables 31.2 and 31.3. 

Colorado Department of Public Health Environment. 1999. Surface Water Quality Classifications and Standards PDE file. 

Telesh, I. V., Nikulina, V. N., 1997. Water quality classification based on phytoplankton communities. 

CO Dept of Public Health and Environ. 1999. Ground water quality classifications and standards. Colorado Department of Public Health Environment. Http //www. cdphe. state.co. us/cdphehom,asp. 

In many cases, the quality of a stream or another water source can be adequately improved by removing more BOD or suspended solids. In other iastances, the effluent is prepared for groundwater recharge which may require only the removal of nutrient. A classification of wastewater treatment processes is given ia Table 3. Table 4 summarizes water quality criteria for various iadustrial uses (10). 

Canton, J.H., Sloof W., Kool, H.J., Struys, J., Pouw, Th. J.M., Wegman.R.C.C., and Piet, G.J. Toxicity, biodegradability, and accumulation of a number of Cl/N-containing compounds for classification and establishing water quality criteria, Reg. Toxicol. Pharm., 5 123-131, 1985. 

Water Quality Standards. The first step in water quality standards is stream use classification. The individual states must decide what the uses of their water will be. The four categories, as defined by the EPA, are Class A, primary water contact recreation Class B, propagation of desirable aquatic life Class C, public water supplies prior to treatment and Class D, agricultural and industrial uses. States may vary the definition of these classes to meet their own needs. The second step is to develop water-quality criteria. This is the specific concentration of a pollutant that is allowable for the designated use. 

Another factor that must be considered in the NPDES program is the receiving water body. The CWA requires states to classify each water body based on its actual or potential use. Water quality standards are then developed for each classification. Once this process is complete, water quality management plans are written to keep dischargers within these limits. 

The principles of ecotoxicological quality classification based on the TU index are included in the 2002 recommendations of the Helsinki Commission (HELCOM). The classification applies to samples of treated effluents discharged to waters from industrial plants manufacturing chemicals,98 textiles,99 and pesticides.100 HELCOM recommends testing the acute toxicity of effluent samples using two of the four suggested indicator organisms (Table 9.6). 

There is no generally accepted quality classification. Nevertheless, water resistance of an explosive is considered to be satisfactory, acceptable, or poor if the cartridge can still be detonated after 24, 8, or 2 hours respectively. 

Parallel classifications of river water quality based on their BOD loadings and independently based on their dissolved oxygen content have been proposed (Table 4.8). As a rough rule of thumb intended to maintain river quality a guideline has been suggested that no discharge to a river should bring the BOD of the river to more than 4 mg/L. 

State water quality standards will frequently be "applicable" or "relevant and appropriate" requirements for a Superfund site. For most states and chemicals, the particular standards that apply to a water body depend upon the designation of the water body as a member of a particular class, with the set of classes varying among states. Risk Assistant contains an automated procedure to help the user in selecting the most appropriate water body classifications for her or his particular site. 

The biological monitoring of water quality in rivers has a long tradition in Europe (see Ziglio et al., 2006 for a recent review). However, the fulfilment of the WFD s requirements imposed a revision of many old assessment methods, which were either adapted to meet WFD specifications or resulted in the setup of new classification systems. 

EN ISO 8689-1 Water quality - Biological classification of rivers - Part 1 Guidance on the interpretation of biological quality data from surveys of benthic macro-invertebrates in running waters (ISO 8689-1 2000) 2000 Under review... 

For a better comprehension of the chemistry of a groundwater system the redox status needs to be well-defined. Until recently, most efforts have relied solely upon Ej.j or pE, intensity factors, as the master variable. However, it is apparent that these intensity factors do not truly represent the redox status of a system because some pertinent redox couples are not electroactive and redox reactions are generally slow and are not at equilibrium. In this paper, the oxidative capacity, a capacity factor, is operationally defined and shown to be a better descriptive parameter of the redox status. Determination of the OXC of an aqueous system allows investigators to cla.ssify the system in terms of well-defined geochemical and microbial parameters. This classification combined with other predictive tools, such as a redox titration, allows one to predict the identity and assess the role of chemical reactions and microbial populations within a specific groundwater system. As such, the capacity factor OXC should be determined in water quality assessment. 

CSN 83 0602. The Determination of Surface Water Quality and Methods of its Classification. Prague 1966. Change and 7.80 (in Czech). 

Three classifications, suspended, dissolved, and volatile sohds, are of particular importance in defining water quality. Suspended sohds and dissolved sohds are measures of size, while volatile sohds is based on a procedure— burning. Filtration through a standard 1.2-/rm pore size filter is used to define suspended and dissolved sohds. The practical definition of suspended sohds is particles larger... 

---