Water quality criteria development

Reevaluation of the State of the Science for Water-Quality Criteria Development Reiley, Stubblefield, Adams, Di Toro, Erickson, Hodson, Keating Jr, editors 2003... 

Technical Guidance Document and Water Framework Directive approaches EU member state, North American, and other international approaches) and the way in which they are implemented (e.g., mandatory pass or fail probabilistic, e.g., 95th percentiles or tiered risk assessment frameworks). Soil and water standards were considered, as were values for the protection of human health and the natural environment. The focus was on European regulatory frameworks, although expert input was sought from other jurisdictions internationally. Chemical standards for aquatic (water and sediment) and terrestrial (soil and groundwater) systems were the main focus for the meeting. This workshop built on, and included some participants from, a 1998 SETAC workshop Re-evaluation of the State of the Science for Water-Quality Criteria Development (Reiley et al. 2003). 

Reiley MC, Stubblefield WA, Adams WJ, Di Toro DM, Hodson PV, Erickson RJ, Keating FJ Jr. 2003. Re-evaluation of the state of the science for water-quality criteria development. Pensacola (FL) SETAC Press. 

The system developed by the Anglian Water Authority illustrates a partial application of this flexible approach to control (Fig. 6.2) [7]. Water quality objectives are set for each section of river based on the lowest relevant water quality criterion, derived in this case from a survey of the scientific literature. Local emission standards ( consents to discharge ) are then set to ensure that concentrations remain within the water quality objectives, taking into account the needs of the whole river system. In order to do this, use is made of a mass balance equation. Dilution by the receiving water is based on the mean flow in the river over the lowest flow 7 day period in 1973, a moderately dry year. In this rather simplistic application, no attempt is made to allow for transformations, losses etc. of lead in the receiving water. 

In the 1970s, high levels of mercury were found in fish taken from Lake St. Clair, which lies between the United States and Canada. Chlorine plants that dumped depleted brine into the waterways were among the contributors. Before these incidents, many assumed that the very low solubility of mercury meant that it would have great difficulty entering the food chain. However, it can be assimilated by certain water-borne bacteria and converted into methyl mercury and its compounds. Eventually, mercury appears in the fatty tissue of fish, concentrated more than 1,000 times. It continues to concentrate as it works its way through the food chain. In a recent development, the EPA adopted a new criterion for water quality based on the level found in fish. The level of 0.3 ppm is equivalent to 7ngL in the water, a 7-fold reduction from the previous standard. This is said to be the first standard based on accumulation of a substance in marine life rather than on its concentration in the water [23]. 

Larval culture is generally straightforward, although sudden crashes are commonly reported in all three species. Two main schools have developed most laboratories use static conditions and water changes at regular intervals, whereas a smaller number of laboratories use flowthrough conditions. In both cases, the quality of the water supply is the primary criterion for success. 

---