Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Wall effect

Difficulties arises in smooth-walled viscometers because placing a structured liquid next to the wall changes the local microstructure [1]. For a simple suspension of smooth spherical particles, the spatial concentration of particles deep in the bulk of the sample, well away from the wall, is random. However, right at the wall, the particle concentration is zero. How do these two points join The answer is that the concentration rises rapidly as one moves away from the wall shows a decaying oscillatory behaviour, then it smoothes to the bulk concentration, see figure 1. This whole process from zero to average concentration takes about five particles diameters. The result is that the material near the wall is essentially different from the bulk, however worse than this is the effective lubricating layer near the wall where the particle concentration is first zero, and is small even up to half a particle diameter. The phenomenon of lower concentration next to the wall is called wall depletion, but is popularly known as sUp, see chapter 15 section 10 for more details. [Pg.42]

The effect is very particle-size dependent, and here particle size for flocculated suspensions means floe size, which is shear-rate dependent. Hence, floes are biggest at low shear rate, and therefore for flocculated systems where this problem is mostly seen, wall slip is a low shear rate phenomena. There are various [Pg.42]

How do we eliminate these wall-depletion/slip effects The answer is to take the viscometer wall motion into the bulk of the liquid, which is done most easily by either roughening or profiling the wall. Sandblasting with a coarse grit should be enough, since this results in approximate 10 - 20 micron surface variations. However, most rheometry manufacturers supply grooved geometries. [Pg.43]

Evaporation is often critical in cone-and-plate and parallel-plate geometries, where drying at the edge of the samples leads to large errors in the measured torque, given that the effect is at the greatest distance from the centre. The way around these problems is two-fold you either create a saturated atmosphere in the air next to the sample, or else you can flood the same area with solvent, see figure 4. [Pg.44]

In some older instruments, chrome-plated brass geometries can be attacked by a number of everyday liquids. Steel and plastic geometries (or even titanium in certain circumstances) are usually recommended, but note the difference between stainless and mild steels, since the latter can produce ions in solution which might alter the viscosity of some aqueous liquids. [Pg.45]

In practice, the influence of the confining walls on the fluid flow will be significant only when the ratio of the particle to container diameters is less than about 30 [Cohen and Metzner, 1981]. Particles will pack less closely near the wall, so that the resistance to flow in a bed of smaller diameter may [Pg.240]

In contrast to this simple approach, Cohen and Metzner [1981] have made use of the detailed voidage profiles in the radial direction and have treated wall effects in a rigorous manner for both Newtonian and power-law fluids in streamline flow. From a practical standpoint, this analysis suggests the effect to be negligible in beds with (D/d) 30 for inelastic fluids. [Pg.241]

Many of the data on the gross terminal velocity of drops have been taken in vertical cylindrical glass tubes of limited size. To interpret such data in terms of a drop moving in an infinite medium, a wall correction factor is necessary. [Pg.66]

A number of authors from Ladenburg (LI) to Happel and Byrne (H4) have derived such correction factors for the movement of a fluid past a rigid sphere held on the axis of symmetry of the cylindrical container. In a recent article, Brenner (B8) has generalized the usual method of reflections. The Navier-Stokes equations of motion around a rigid sphere, with use of an added reflection flow, gives an approximate solution for the ratio of sphere velocity in an infinite space to that in a tower of diameter Dr  [Pg.66]

The stream function satisfying the fourth-order differential equation, used by Haberman and Sayre (H2) is [Pg.66]

Their solution, involving Gegenbauer functions, resulted in a wall correction factor for rigid spheres which is the same as the full expression corresponding to Eq. (32). [Pg.66]

Using a similar attack for a fully circulating fluid sphere in a stationary field but using only n = 2 due to inconsistency of the equations for higher order functions, their wall correction factor was [Pg.66]


In the Reclaimator, a high pressure extmder, fiber-free mbber is heated to 175—205°C with oils and other ingredients. High pressure and shear between the mbber mixture and the extmder barrel walls effectively devulcanize the mixture in one to three minutes. In the Lancaster-Banbury method, high temperature, pressure, and shear are appHed to the mbber in a batch process that is otherwise similar to the Reclaimator process. In another high pressure process, scrap mbber is devulcanized at 5.5—6.9 MPa (54—68 atm) for ca five minutes. The product is milled, baled, or pelletized as in other processes. [Pg.19]

Wall Effects When the diameter of a setthng particle is significant compared to the diameter of the container, the settling velocity is reduced. For rigid spherical particles settling with Re < 1, the correction given in Table 6-9 may be used. The factor k is multiplied by the settling velocity obtained from Stokes law to obtain the corrected set-... [Pg.680]

The constant pattern concept has also been extended to circumstances with nonplug flows, with various degrees of rigor, including flow profiles in tubes [Sartory, Jnd. Eng. Chem. Fundam., 17, 97 (1978) Tereck et al., Jnd. Eng. Chem. Res., 26, 1222 (1987)], wall effects [Vortmeyer and Michael, Chem. Eng. ScL, 40, 2135 (1985)], channeling [LeVan and Vermeulen in Myers and Belfort (eds.). Fundamentals of Adsorption, Engineering Foundation, New York (1984), pp. 305-314, AJChE Symp. Ser No. 233, 80, 34 (1984)], networks [Aviles and LeVan, Chem. Eng. Sci., 46, 1935 (1991)], and general structures of constant cross section [RudisiU and LeVan, Jnd. Eng. Chem. Res., 29, 1054 (1991)]. [Pg.1528]

A flood factor of. 65 to. 75 should be used for column diameters under 36" to compensate for wall effects. Larger columns are typically designed for about 80% of flood. [Pg.64]

A smaller column is not recommended as the wall effect becomes significant. [Pg.431]

This equation is based on a negligible wall effect. The design values of P, and Pj must be determined from a scale drawing, which is made to allow the required number of jets to be installed in the available area. This area is restricted by the limitation that no jet should be placed closer than 300 mm from the inside wall of the stack. The spacing is also affected by air flow considerations, which may require the layout to be modified. [Pg.261]

As in CE, changing system variables (e.g., pH, ionic strength, additive concentration) is very easy in any of the continuous free flow electrophoresis systems reported here because all the interactions take place in free solution. Indeed, changing system variables may be easier in continuous free flow electrophoresis systems than in a CE system because there are essentially no wall effects. Of course, changing system variables in the continuous free flow electrophoresis apparatus may also be easier... [Pg.295]

Many of the mechanical aspects of tower construcdon and assembly have an influence upon the design and interpretation of tower performance. Every effort should be made to increase the effectiveness of contact between the process streams and to reduce losses by entrainment or wall effects at a minimum expenditure of pressure drop. At the same time the design must be consistent with the economics dictated by the process and type of construction. [Pg.234]

It seems that indeed the answers to many fundamental questions are obtained, at least in qualitative form. Perhaps, the most important exception are thixotropic phenomena. There are many of them and the necessary systematization and mathematical generalization are absent here. Thus, it is not clear how to describe the effect of an amplitude on nonlinear dynamic properties. It is not clear what is the depth and kinetics of the processes of fracture-reduction of structure, formed by a filler during deformation. Further, there is no strict description of wall effects and a friction law for a wall slip is unknown in particular. [Pg.96]

In general, the flow rate F(t) consists of the following additive components the controlled flow rate Fd of the entering gas, the flow rate Fi which is due to parasitic leaks and/or diffusion, and the flow rate Fw resulting from possible adsorption-desorption processes on the system walls (in Section I, references are given to papers dealing with the elimination or control of the wall effects in the flash filament technique). In each of these flow rate components a particular ratio of the investigated adsorbate and of the inert gas exists and all these components contribute to the over-all mean values Fh(t) and F (t). [Pg.355]

Celata GP, Cumo M, McPhail S, Zummo G (2006) Characterization of fluid dynamics behavior and channel wall effects in micro-tube. Int J Heat Fluid Flow 27 135-143... [Pg.140]

The work reported here is part of a continuing program on the emulsion polymerization of styrene in a tubular reactor. It is now evident that the reactor construction is of primary importance in avoiding the problem of reactor plugging. The plugging is associated with a wall effect so that both the reactor dimensions and the nature of the wall surface are important. [Pg.133]

In 1996, the first examples of intermolecular microwave-assisted Heck reactions were published [85]. Among these, the successful coupling of iodoben-zene with 2,3-dihydrofuran in only 6 min was reported (Scheme 75). Interestingly, thermal heating procedures (125-150 °C) resulted in the formation of complex product mixtures affording less than 20% of the expected 2-phenyl-2,3-dihydrofuran. The authors hypothesize that this difference is the result of well-known advantages of microwave irradiation, e.g., elimination of wall effects and low thermal gradients in the reaction mixture. [Pg.194]

Egolfopoulos, F.N., Zhang, H., and Zhang, Z., Wall effects on the propagation and extinction of steady, strained, laminar premixed flames. Combust. Flame, 109,237,1997. [Pg.44]

Definitions of flame parameters in channels. D, distance between channel walls effective in flame quenching (quenching distance). D, flame width dead space R, radius of curvature of the flame. [Pg.103]

In this chapter we address several phenomena involving a solvent, principally water, and a stationary surface. These include various wetting and wall effects, chromatography, and membrane passage. Some of these phenomena have been modeled with cellular automata, and a brief description of those studies will be presented. Each of these examples opens up a wealth of possibilities for future work, and the reader is urged to pursue some studies that these may inspire. [Pg.87]

Example 6.2. Influence of water flow rate on wall effect... [Pg.91]

In equation (2) Rq is the equivalent capillary radius calculated from the bed hydraulic radius (l7), Rp is the particle radius, and the exponential, fxinction contains, in addition the Boltzman constant and temperature, the total energy of interaction between the particle and capillary wall force fields. The particle streamline velocity Vp(r) contains a correction for the wall effect (l8). A similar expression for results with the exception that for the marker the van der Waals attraction and Born repulsion terms as well as the wall effect are considered to be negligible (3 ). [Pg.3]

For 1,2-dichlorobutane one only has to compare the compounds that come dose to this in the table (1,2-dichloropropane for instance, 555 to 557°C) to realise that there is, surprisingly, such a fall in the experimental value for the compound, which differs from 1,2-dichloropropane by one CH2 group only. A wall effect for this substance is thus postulated since the AIT due to Hilado was measured in a metallic container apparatus whose surface condition could be seriously modified by the presence of hydrogen chloride produced by decomposition and combustion of chlorinated substances during previous tests. [Pg.80]


See other pages where Wall effect is mentioned: [Pg.162]    [Pg.518]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.628]    [Pg.1419]    [Pg.1476]    [Pg.1889]    [Pg.2425]    [Pg.2425]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.269]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.1340]    [Pg.1002]    [Pg.1067]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.235]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.23]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.364]    [Pg.339]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.13]    [Pg.178]    [Pg.67]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.17 , Pg.77 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.21 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.309 , Pg.327 , Pg.343 , Pg.350 , Pg.354 , Pg.381 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.75 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.406 , Pg.408 , Pg.477 , Pg.555 , Pg.568 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.179 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.320 , Pg.443 , Pg.568 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.14 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.121 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.406 , Pg.408 , Pg.477 , Pg.555 , Pg.568 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.251 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.465 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.310 , Pg.311 ]

See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.61 ]




SEARCH



Capillary electrophoresis wall effects

Cell wall auxin effect

Cold wall effect

Column wall effect

Creeping flow wall effects

Diffusion wall effect

Drag coefficient wall effects

Effect of Inlet Velocity on Wall Superheat

Effect of Wall Roughness

Effective wall heat transfer

Effective wall heat transfer coefficient

Effects of tube walls

Falling particles wall effects

First-wall, impurities, effects

Heat transfer wall-drop, effective

Hot-wall effect

Hydrophobic wall state effect

Kinetics, chemical wall effects

Longitudinal wall heat conduction effect

Modeling wall slip effects

Packings wall effect

Particle wall effect

Porous solids wall effect

Secondary motion wall effects

Sherwood number wall effects

Single-walled carbon nanotube field effect

Single-walled carbon nanotube field effect transistor

Spheres wall effects

Terminal velocity wall effects

Velocity wall effect

Wakes wall effects

Wall effects, microwave-assisted

Wall-coverings health effects

Wall-effect reaction

Wall-slip effect

Wall-slip effect elimination

Wall-slip effect flow mechanics

Wall-slip effect measurement

© 2024 chempedia.info