Kinetics, chemical wall effects

As long as the fluid dynamics and reaction kinetics are closely interconnected so that their effects on the chemical reactions are inseparable, the only mode to scale down an industrial reactor to an integral laboratory reactor is to reduce the reactor diameter and keeping the same length. Thus, the flmd dynamic similarity is maintained (if the diameter is not reduced beyond the limit set by the wall effects), and the experiments are carried out not only at the same space velocity as in the industrial situation but also at the same liqmd and gas linear velocities. This approach is based on the idea that in the industrial reactor the behavior in a horizontal plane within the bed is the same... 

There are many chemically reacting flow situations in which a reactive stream flows interior to a channel or duct. Two such examples are illustrated in Figs. 1.4 and 1.6, which consider flow in a catalytic-combustion monolith [28,156,168,259,322] and in the channels of a solid-oxide fuel cell. Other examples include the catalytic converters in automobiles. Certainly there are many industrial chemical processes that involve reactive flow tubular reactors. Innovative new short-contact-time processes use flow in catalytic monoliths to convert raw hydrocarbons to higher-value chemical feedstocks [37,99,100,173,184,436, 447]. Certain types of chemical-vapor-deposition reactors use a channel to direct flow over a wafer where a thin film is grown or deposited [219]. Flow reactors used in the laboratory to study gas-phase chemical kinetics usually strive to achieve plug-flow conditions and to minimize wall-chemistry effects. Nevertheless, boundary-layer simulations can be used to verify the flow condition or to account for non-ideal behavior [147]. 

Hormone-treated pea seedlings generate two physically distinct cellulases (EC 3.2.1.4), with similar substrate specificities, Km values, and inhibitor sensitivities. They may be effectively separated by sequential extraction with buffer and salt and they appear to possess identical active sites but different apoprotein structures. The question arises of why this tissue should elaborate two hydrolases which catalyze the same reactions. The cellulase that forms first is synthesized by and accumulates in vesicles, where it would never encounter cellulose, while the other is concentrated on the inner wall microfibrils. It is suggested that only the latter cellulase functions to hydrolyze cellulose. A precursor/ product relationship between them could explain their distribution and developmental kinetics, but physical and chemical differences mitigate against this interpretation. 

Today contractors and licensors use sophisticated computerized mathematical models which take into account the many variables involved in the physical, chemical, geometrical and mechanical properties of the system. ICI, for example, was one of the first to develop a very versatile and effective model of the primary reformer. The program REFORM [361], [430], [439] can simulate all major types of reformers (see below) top-fired, side-fired, terraced-wall, concentric round configurations, the exchanger reformers (GHR, for example), and so on. The program is based on reaction kinetics, correlations with experimental heat transfer data, pressure drop functions, advanced furnace calculation methods, and a kinetic model of carbon formation [419],... 

Among the areas not covered here is that of intrinsic instabilities associated with chemical-kinetic mechanisms, as exhibited in cool-flame phenomena, for example these subjects are touched briefly in Section B.2.5.3. Intrinsic instabilities of detonations were considered in Section 6.3.1 and will not be revisited. Certain aspects of intrinsic instabilities of diffusion flames were mentioned briefly in Section 3.4.4 diffusion flames appear to exhibit fewer intrinsic instabilities than premixed flames, although under appropriate experimental conditions their effects can be observed, as indicated at the end of Section 9.5.2. Certain chamber instabilities that are not related to acoustic instabilities (such as Coanda effects—oscillatory attachment of flows to different walls) will not be discussed here, but reviews are available [1]. 

Use Figure 3-1 as a starting point and sketch the relation between reactor volume and nonequilibrium conversion of carbon monoxide if the insnlation that covers the wall of the tubular reactor is removed. Think about the effect that heat transfer across the wall of the reactor has on the temperature of the reactive fluid. Then, consider the effect of temperature on the kinetics of the reaction, and the effect of chemical kinetics on the reactor volume required to achieve a specified conversion. Finally, consider the effect of temperature... 

Moreover the effect of chemical reaction rate constant and also of some physical parameters of liquid flows (density, viscosity) on conditions of characteristic macroscopic fronts formation in turbulent flows limited by impenetrable wall allows supposing the various nature of reaction and mixing fronts formation. In the first case kinetic and diffusion process parameters are determinant, and in the second - preliminary convective and turbulent transfer. The influence of density and viscosity of liquid flows, i.e. parameters determining hydrodynamic regime of liquid flows in tubular canals on conditions of reaction and mixing plan front formation shows the important role of hydrodynamic constituent also in general case under corresponding macrostructures formation. 

To understand heat conduction, diffusion, viscosity and chemical kinetics the mechanistic view of molecule motion is of fundamental importance. The fundamental quantity is the mean-free path, i. e. the distance of a molecule between two collisions with any other molecule. The number of collisions between a molecule and a wall was shown in Chapter 4.1.1.2 to be z = CNQvdtl6. Similarly, we can calculate the number of collisions between molecules from a geometric view. We denote that all molecules have the mean speed v and their mean relative speed with respect to the colliding molecule is g. When two molecules collide, the distance between their centers is d in the case of identical molecules, d corresponds to the effective diameter of the molecule. Hence, this molecule will collide in the time dt with any molecule centre that lies in a cylinder of a diameter 2d with the area Jid and length gdt (it follows that the volume is Jtd gdt). The area where d is the molecule (particle) diameter is also called collisional cross section a. This is a measure of the area (centered on the centre of the mass of one of the particles) through which the particles cannot pass each other without colliding. Hence, the number of collisions is z = c n gdt. A more correct derivation, taking into account the motion of all other molecules with a Maxwell distribution (see below), leads to the same expression for z but with a factor of V2. We have to consider the relative speed, which is the vector difference between the velocities of two objects A and B (here for A relative to B) ... 

Several feruloyl esterases have been purified and characterized (Table 1). However, comparison of their properties is difficult as the range of natural and synthetic substrates used to characterize these enzymes is diverse and the enzyme assays are not unifomi. The substrates range in size and complexity from small, soluble esters such as feruloylated oligosaccharides isolated from plant cell walls and phenolic acid methyl esters or synthetic feruloylated arabinosides to larger, more complex and often less soluble substrates such as feruloylated polymeric plant cell wall fractions (28). The only criterion used in all cases is the release of free ferulic acid or another hydroxycinnamic acid by hydrolysis of an ester bond. Specificity, as defined by Ae rate of catalysis (kca divided by the Michaelis constant gives the best indication of preferred substrates. However, hydrolysis of polymeric substrates is more complicated since not all of the esterified substituents are chemically equal, and effects such as decreased solubility and steric hindrance further complicates any results obtained. Therefore, these data should not be extrapolated to obtain kinetic constants. 

Gradients depend on the ratio of time scales of various transport and chemical processes. Diffusion (conduction) time scales can easily be estimated from the square of the corresponding length scale divided by the diffusivity (thermal diffusivity). Temperature usually has a fairly small effect on transport time scales (an exception is surface diffusion that is often activated). On the other hand, the time scale of reaction depends very strongly on the chemistry (process) itself and the temperature (via Arrhenius kinetics) and secondary on species concentrations and pressure. Discontinuity at the walls (e.g. slip, lack of thermal accommodation) may also be encountered, but since these phenomena depend on transverse gradients, which are smaller than in large devices, are by-and-large less important in microdevices (I). 

---