Heat transfer wall-drop, effective

The baffle cut determines the fluid velocity between the baffle and the shell wall, and the baffle spacing determines the parallel and cross-flow velocities that affect heat transfer and pressure drop. Often the shell side of an exchanger is subject to low-pressure drop limitations, and the baffle patterns must be arranged to meet these specified conditions and at the same time provide maximum effectiveness for heat transfer. The plate material used for these supports and baffles should not be too thin and is usually minimum thick-... 

On the other hand Bao et al. (2000) reported that the measured heat transfer coefficients for the air-water system are always higher than would be expected for the corresponding single-phase liquid flow, so that the addition of air can be considered to have an enhancing effect. This paper reports an experimental study of non-boiling air-water flows in a narrow horizontal tube (diameter 1.95 mm). Results are presented for pressure drop characteristics and for local heat transfer coefficients over a wide range of gas superficial velocity (0.1-50m/s), liquid superficial velocity (0.08-0.5 m/s) and wall heat flux (3-58 kW/m ). 

The temperature distribution has a characteristic maximum within the liquid domain, which is located in the vicinity of the evaporation front. Such a maximum results from two opposite factors (1) heat transfer from the hot wall to the liquid, and (2) heat removal due to the liquid evaporation at the evaporation front. The pressure drops monotonically in both domains and there is a pressure jump at the evaporation front due to the surface tension and phase change effect on the liquid-vapor interface. 

Values for the various parameters in these equations can be estimated from published correlations. See Suggestions for Further Reading. It turns out, however, that bubbling fluidized beds do not perform particularly well as chemical reactors. At or near incipient fluidization, the reactor approximates piston flow. The small catalyst particles give effectiveness factors near 1, and the pressure drop—equal to the weight of the catalyst—is moderate. However, the catalyst particles are essentially quiescent so that heat transfer to the vessel walls is poor. At higher flow rates, the bubbles promote mixing in the emulsion phase and enhance heat transfer, but at the cost of increased axial dispersion. 

Two-phase flows are classified by the void (bubble) distributions. Basic modes of void distribution are bubbles suspended in the liquid stream liquid droplets suspended in the vapor stream and liquid and vapor existing intermittently. The typical combinations of these modes as they develop in flow channels are called flow patterns. The various flow patterns exert different effects on the hydrodynamic conditions near the heated wall thus they produce different frictional pressure drops and different modes of heat transfer and boiling crises. Significant progress has been made in determining flow-pattern transition and modeling. 

The second term on the right-hand side of Eq. (3-95) represents the effect of the wall-drop heat transfer. The heat transfer analysis of dispersed-flow film boiling is discussed in Section 4.4.3. 

The overall effect of catalyst pellet geometry on heat transfer and reformer performance is shown in the simulation results presented in Table 1. The performance of the traditional Raschig ring (now infrequently used) and a modern 4-hole geometry is compared. The benefits of improved catalyst design in terms of tube wall temperature, methane conversion and pressure drop are self-evident. 

Consider now increasing the heat flux after the condition described above is established. The temperature drop through the liquid layer will increase, thus increasing the wall temperature. Eventually the liquid superheat at the wall will be so large that nucleation will occur. When it does, it augments the forced convection effect. Now the heat transfer coefficient is higher than for cases where the heat flux is the same, but where the higher mass flux suppresses the nucleation. 

Air enters a small duct having a cross section of an equilateral triangle, 3.0 mm on a side. The entering temperature is 27°C and the exit temperature is 77°C. If the flow rate is 5 x 10 3 kg/s and the tube length is 30 cm, calculate the tube wall temperature necessary to effect the heat transfer. Also calculate the pressure drop. The pressure is 1 atm. ... 

The problem of the optimal particle shape and size is crucial for packed bed reactor design. Generally, the larger the particle diameter, the cheaper the catalyst. This is not usually a significant factor in process design - more important are the internal and external diffusion effects, the pressure drop, the heat transfer to the reactor walls and a uniform fluid flow. 

With the measurements subject to fluctuations of 20 or 30%, no accurate description of the profile is possible. All that can be said is that with moderate ratios of tube to particle diameter, the maximum velocity is about twice the minimum, and that when the particles are relatively small, the profile is relatively flat near the axis. It is fairly well established that the ratio of the velocity at a given radial position to the average velocity is independent of the average velocity over a wide range. Another observation that is not so easy to understand is that the velocity reaches a maximum one or two particle diameters from the wall. Since the wall does not contribute any more than the packing to the surface per unit volume in the region within one-half particle diameter from the wall, there is no obvious reason for the velocity to drop off farther than some small fraction of a particle diameter from the wall. In any case, all the variations that affect heat transfer close to the wall can be lumped together and accounted for by an effective heat-transfer coefficient. Material transport close to the wall is not very important, because the diffusion barrier at the wall makes the radial variation of concentration small. 

Today contractors and licensors use sophisticated computerized mathematical models which take into account the many variables involved in the physical, chemical, geometrical and mechanical properties of the system. ICI, for example, was one of the first to develop a very versatile and effective model of the primary reformer. The program REFORM [361], [430], [439] can simulate all major types of reformers (see below) top-fired, side-fired, terraced-wall, concentric round configurations, the exchanger reformers (GHR, for example), and so on. The program is based on reaction kinetics, correlations with experimental heat transfer data, pressure drop functions, advanced furnace calculation methods, and a kinetic model of carbon formation [419],... 

When a deposit layer is formed, surface temperature is increased and wall emissivity decreased. However, the superposition of these effects on rjf is less than a pure summation since, by decreasing e, the net heat flux to the layer is reduced, thus retarding the increase of surface temperature to a certain extent. The simple well-stirred analysis, carried out for constant surface temperatures yields typically a drop of furnace efficiency rif of 5.5 percentage points corresponding to an increase of furnace exit temperatures of HO K for a decrease of from 0.8 to 0.4. Detailed 3-D furnace heat transfer calculations carried out for the same decrease of but allowing a variation of surface temperatures yield typically losses of rif only 3.5 percentage points corresponding to increase of Tgx of only 70 K. 

PFR behavior is attained when Pe exceeds 10. However, considering the end effects, it is desirable to select a higher nnmber (say, 50) for which the length-to-diameter ratio can be estimated from Equations (CS1.5) and (CS1.6) and that works out to be 12.5. Thus, the plug-flow condition is satisfied when L/D > 12.5 for a given volume of a PFR. For selection of optimum L/D, the following points need to be considered (1) pressure drop, (2) heat transfer area of the wall, and (3) fixed cost. Let us estimate these for L/D = 1000 ... 

To observe the effect of viscous dissipation on heat transfer, in Table 2, the frilly developed Nusselt number is presented for constant wall temperature and constant wall heat flux cases with and without viscous dissipation. For all cases, the fully developed Nusselt number decreases as Kn increases. For Tw = constant, for the no-slip condition (Kn = 0), when Br = 0.01, Nu = 9.5985, while it drops down to 3.8227 for Kn = 0.1, a decrease of 60.2%. Similarly for Qw = constant, for the no-slip condition, when Br = 0.01, Nu = 4.1825, while it drops down to 2.9450 for Kn = 0.1, with a decrease of 29.6%. This is due to the fact that the temperature jump, which increases with increasing rarefaction, reduces heat transfer, as can be observed from Eqs. (10) and (17). A negative Br value for the constant wall heat flux condition refers to the fluid being cooled, therefore Nu takes higher values for Br < 0 and lower values for Br > 0 compared with those for no viscous heating. 

---