Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Validation Alternative approach

It may happen that AH is not available for the buffer substance used in the kinetic studies moreover the thermodynamic quantity A//° is not precisely the correct quantity to use in Eq. (6-37) because it does not apply to the experimental solvent composition. Then the experimentalist can determine AH. The most direct method is to measure AH calorimetrically however, few laboratories Eire equipped for this measurement. An alternative approach is to measure K, under the kinetic conditions of temperature and solvent this can be done potentiometrically or by potentiometry combined with spectrophotometry. Then, from the slope of the plot of log K a against l/T, AH is calculated. Although this value is not thermodynamically defined (since it is based on the assumption that AH is temperature independent), it will be valid for the present purpose over the temperature range studied. [Pg.258]

What is needed is an alternative approach which permits development of valid cause and effect relationships. This strategy, one involving intensive surveys, is referred to here as mechanistic. The Willamette River, Oregon, USA, is used as a case study to illustrate quantitative, semi-quantitative and qualitative approaches to mechanistic assessment of river water quality using, respectively, dissolved oxygen depletion, erosion/deposition and potentially toxic trace elements as examples. [Pg.260]

This validation typically requires samples with radiolabeled analytes. However, alternative approaches are proposed which involve (i) comparison with extraction of samples using a procedure which has been previously validated rigorously, (ii) comparison with extraction of samples by a very different technique or (iii) analysis of a certified reference material. Generally, this validation should be performed with samples containing analyte incurred by the route by which residues would normally be expected to arise. The simplest option (i) requires fully validated and documented enforcement methods provided by the manufacturer of a pesticide. [Pg.119]

This parameter, the smoke parameter, is based on continuous mass loss measurements, since the specific extinction area is a function of the mass loss rate. A normal OSU calorimeter cannot, thus, be used to measure smoke parameter. An alternative approach is to determine similar properties, based on the same concept, but using variables which can be measured in isolation from the sample mass. The product of the specific extinction area by the mass loss rate per unit area is the rate of smoke release. A smoke factor (SmkFct) can thus be defined as the product of the total smoke released (time integral of the rate of smoke release) by the maximum rate of heat release [19], In order to test the validity of this magnitude, it is important to verify its correlation with the smoke parameter measured in the Cone calorimeter. [Pg.525]

Method qualification is based on ICH method validation guidelines. Method type (purity or identity) will dictate the level of qualification testing necessary. Several strategies for method qualification and validation exist and are based on needs, resources available, and the project timeframe. One approach is to perform minimal development and qualification, which may be necessary for projects with shorter timelines, but it may place more burden and risk on future validation activities for robustness testing, and can result in failure. As discussed in Chapter 4, an alternate approach would invest more time and resources into method development, followed by extensive qualification and robusmess testing to determine if further development is... [Pg.358]

Validation of models is desired but can be difficult to achieve. Models are empirically validated by examining how output data (predictions) compare with observed data (such comparisons, of course, must be conducted on data sets that have not been used to create or specify the model). However, model validations conducted in this manner are difficult given limitations on data sources. As an alternative approach, model credibility can be assessed by a careful examination of the subcomponents of the model and inputs. One should ask the question Does the selection of input variables and the way they are processed make sense Also, confidence in the model may be augmented by peer reviews and the opinion of the scientific community. Common faults and shortcomings are... [Pg.159]

Hartung T, Bremer S, Casati S et al (2004) A modular approach to the ECVAM principles on test validity. Altern Lab Anim 32(5) 467- 72... [Pg.341]

In this synthetic approach, thallium(III) trifluoroacetate (see Section 6.1.1.2.2) is employed for the regioselective disulfide generation in the second step. Although the thallium(III) reagent represents a valid alternative to iodine, only a few examples have been reported. [Pg.116]

In the following section we summarize the current general recommendations for bioanalytical method validation practices according to the FDA guidelines, with other alternative approaches to be discussed later. [Pg.107]

An alternative approach to the system characterization, valid for any system, is the perceptual approach. In the context of this chapter a perceptual approach is defined as an approach in which aspects of human perception are modelled in order to make measurements on audio signals that have a high correlation with the subjectively perceived quality of these signals and that can be applied to any signal, that is, speech, music and test signals. [Pg.302]

A complete and detailed analysis of the formal properties of the QCL approach [5] has revealed that while this scheme is internally consistent, inconsistencies arise in the formulation of a quantum-classical statistical mechanics within such a framework. In particular, the fact that time translation invariance and the Kubo identity are only valid to O(h) have implications for the calculation of quantum-classical correlation functions. Such an analysis has not yet been conducted for the ILDM approach. In this chapter we adopt an alternative prescription [6,7]. This alternative approach supposes that we start with the full quantum statistical mechanical structure of time correlation functions, average values, or, in general, the time dependent density, and develop independent approximations to both the quantum evolution, and to the equilibrium density. Such an approach has proven particularly useful in many applications [8,9]. As was pointed out in the earlier publications [6,7], the consistency between the quantum equilibrium structure and the approximate... [Pg.416]

Crompton, J. and Love, L.L. (1995) The predictive validity of alternate approaches to evaluating quality of a festival. Journal of Travel Research 34 (1), 11—25. [Pg.207]

An alternative approach to normalizing rates of drug metabolism by recombinant CYP enzymes is the application of a relative activity factor (RAF), in which the correction is not based on specific content but on specific activity, which requires a comparison of the rate of metabolism of a selective marker substrate by each recombinant CYP enzyme and human liver microsomes (75,194). The RAF is then multiplied by the observed rates of drug metabolism by each recombinant CYP enzyme before assessing the relative contribution of each enzyme to the metabolism of the drug. This approach has not been well validated. For example, it is not known whether the relative activity factor remains constant for several marker substrate reactions catalyzed by the same CYP enzyme. If the relative activity factor varies in a substrate-dependent manner, it would be difficult to know which RAF value to apply to the drug candidate under investigation. Another limitation of this approach is that the relative activity factor must be empirically determined for each lot of recombinant CYP enzyme (and preferably each batch of pooled human liver microsomes). [Pg.334]

Many refinements to cross-validation have been proposed in the literature. It is possible to perform cross-validation on the x block to determine the optimum number of components instead of the c block. There are several alternative approaches to cross-validation, a common one involving leaving larger proportions of the data out (e.g. one tenth) at a time, valuable for very large datasets. Some statisticians also propose methods involving removing individual measurements rather than individual objects or spectra, but such approaches are less used in analytical chemistry. The leave one sample out at a time method is a popular, easily implemented, and widespread approach. There tends to be a significant divide between... [Pg.21]


See other pages where Validation Alternative approach is mentioned: [Pg.915]    [Pg.915]    [Pg.1371]    [Pg.286]    [Pg.756]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.219]    [Pg.185]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.262]    [Pg.245]    [Pg.283]    [Pg.302]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.327]    [Pg.107]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.12]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.903]    [Pg.204]    [Pg.233]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.345]    [Pg.36]    [Pg.154]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.97]    [Pg.119]    [Pg.597]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.385]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.313 , Pg.334 ]




SEARCH



Alternate approaches

© 2024 chempedia.info