Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Treatment process parameters

PDMS has been shown to have no significant effect on wastewater-treatment process parameters—such as biological... [Pg.650]

Table 7.10 lists common recommended surface treatments for plastic adherends. These treatments are necessary when plastics are to be joined with adhesives. Specific surface treatments for certain plastics and their effect on surface property characteristics are discussed in Sec. 7.6. Details regarding the surface treatment process parameters may also be found in ASTM D-2093 and various texts on adhesive bonding of plastics. An excellent source of information regarding prebond surface treatments is the suppher of the plastic resin that is being joined. [Pg.442]

The carboxylated units, ionized, decrease adsorption on subterranean substrates (23), ia proportion to the number of units, an important parameter ia petroleum recovery processes. In waste treatment processes cationic acrylamide comonomer units are often used (31) to iacrease adsorption and thereby flocculation of soHds ia wastewater (see Acrylamide POLYMERS Flocculating agents). The favorable and characteristics of acrylamide facilitate the... [Pg.317]

The effect of mechanical treatment on floe behavior is illustrated in Figure 5. In one work (40), identical slurries were treated with varying doses of the same polymer. At each dosage, it can be assumed that the same type of floe formed at the same rate. However, the dosage response was completely different depending on which parameter of the flocculated slurry was measured. Thus the term optimal flocculation caimot be appHed to any flocculant—substrate combination if the soHd—Hquid separation process or process parameter is not specified. [Pg.35]

The performance of SCWO for waste treatment has been demonstrated (15,16). In these studies, a broad number of refractory materials such as chlorinated solvents, polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs), and pesticides were studied as a function of process parameters (17). The success of these early studies led to pilot studies which showed that chlorinated hydrocarbons, including 1,1,1-trichloroethane /7/-T5-6y,(9-chlorotoluene [95-49-8] and hexachlorocyclohexane, could be destroyed to greater than 99.99997, 99.998, and 99.9993%, respectively. In addition, no traces of organic material could be detected in the gaseous phase, which consisted of carbon dioxide and unreacted oxygen. The pilot unit had a capacity of 3 L/min of Hquid effluent and was operated for a maximum of 24 h. [Pg.499]

Mass Transfer and Kinetics in Rotary Kilns. The rates of mass transfer of gases and vapors to and from the sohds iu any thermal treatment process are critical to determining how long the waste must be treated. Oxygen must be transferred to the sohds. However, mass transfer occurs iu the context of a number of other processes as well. The complexity of the processes and the parallel nature of steps 2, 3, 4, and 5 of Figure 2, require that the parameters necessary for modeling the system be determined empirically. In this discussion the focus is on rotary kilns. [Pg.50]

Measurable Process Parameters. The RO process is relatively simple ia design. It consists of a feed water source, feed pretreatment, high pressure pump, RO membrane modules, and ia some cases, post-treatment steps. A schematic of the RO process is shown ia Figure 2a. [Pg.145]

Much of the experience and data from wastewater treatment has been gained from municipal treatment plants. Industrial liquid wastes are similar to wastewater but differ in significant ways. Thus, typical design parameters and standards developed for municipal wastewater operations must not be blindly utilized for industrial wastewater. It is best to run laboratory and small pilot tests with the specific industrial wastewater as part of the design process. It is most important to understand the temporal variations in industrial wastewater strength, flow, and waste components and their effect on the performance of various treatment processes. Industry personnel in an effort to reduce cost often neglect laboratory and pilot studies and depend on waste characteristics from similar plants. This strategy often results in failure, delay, and increased costs. Careful studies on the actual waste at a plant site cannot be overemphasized. [Pg.2213]

A more recent process, the P2 etch [60], which uses ferric sulfate as an oxidizer in place of sodium dichromate avoids the use of toxic chromates, but still provides a similar oxide surface morphology (Fig. 15) allowing a mechanically interlocked interface and strong bonding [9]. The P2 treatment has wide process parameter windows over a broad range of time-temperature-solution concentration conditions and mechanical testing confirms that P2-prepared surfaces are, at a minimum, equivalent to FPL-prepared specimens and only slightly inferior to PAA-prepared surfaces [61]. [Pg.964]

Optimized grit blast/silane treatments can provide wedge test durability as good as PAA with failure entirely cohesive within the adhesive (Fig. 21) [89]. Maintaining the process parameters within acceptable tolerances is critical with the heat drying of the silane on the treated surface being the most sensitive process parameter. [Pg.975]

System designed for industrial and municipal wastewater treatment facility data management, including key process parameters and plant evaluation. [Pg.290]

Service facilities, electrical sub-station, water treatment, fuel storage, etc. will depend upon process parameters, mainly tonnage or volume handled, and may need to be assessed from the summation of the individual activity areas, but it will be affected by technology when improved techniques are being introduced. [Pg.72]

Today a wide range of modem water treatment processes and programs are available that have been developed and perfected to suit the many different types and applications of boilers now operating. These include the many high-pressure (HP) units around the world, which tend to be operated within extremely strict (often knife edge ) control parameters. [Pg.3]

Koh YKK, Chiu TY, Boobis AR, Scrimshaw MD, Bagnall JP, Soares A, Pollard S, Cartmell E, Lester JN (2009) Influence of operating parameters on the biodegradation of steroid estrogens and nonylphenolic compounds during biological wastewater treatment processes. Environ Sci Technol 43 6646-6654... [Pg.108]

Parameters that affect the elimination of pollutants in sludge treatment processes... [Pg.279]

The performance of a biotreatment system ultimately depends on optimization of the activity of microbes and the ability to control the process parameters of the treatment system [157]. In this respect, the ability to monitor gene copy numbers and gene expression is highly useful for real time optimization of the efficiency of a biotreatment system. Advanced molecular techniques as well as low cost methods (e.g., antibody detection of enzymes based on color reaction strips fluorescence i.e., GFP marked organisms with UV light detection) can also be applied to monitor the microbial community structure, persistence of the added bacteria, and their interactions with indigenous populations. [Pg.28]

Software sensors and related methods - This last group is considered because of the complexity of wastewater composition and of treatment process control. As all relevant parameters are not directly measurable, as will be seen hereafter, the use of more or less complex mathematical models for the calculation (estimation) of some of them is sometimes proposed. Software sensing is thus based on methods that allow calculation of the value of a parameter from the measurement of one or more other parameters, the measurement principle of which is completely different from an existing standard/reference method, or has no direct relation. Statistical correlative methods can also be considered in this group. Some examples will be presented in the following section. [Pg.255]

Relatively far from the present topic and well known, the on-line measurement of the physical and aggregate properties of wastewater does not present any problem. Conductivity, temperature, turbidity and oxido-reduction potential (ORP) are easily measured by well-designed sensors, because these parameters are also used for treatment process control. In practice, turbidity is more used for the treatment of natural water, and ORP for the biological treatment of wastewater. However, conductivity and temperature are often monitored at the same time as the other parameters in this section. [Pg.256]

Even if few systems are proposed for inorganic compounds (with regard to the number of potential pollutants), instruments or sensors for parameters used for treatment process control are available UV systems for residual chlorine in deodorization, electrochemical sensors for dissolved oxygen (with nowadays a luminescent dissolved-oxygen probe utilizing a sensor coated with a luminescent material) and a colorimetric technique for residual ozone. [Pg.259]

Atomization, or generally speaking droplet generation, is an extremely complex process that cannot yet be precisely predicted theoretically. The lack of general theoretical treatment of droplet processes has led to the development of numerous empirical correlations for droplet properties as a function of process parameters and material properties. In this chapter, empirical and analytical correlations for the prediction of droplet properties, such as droplet size distribution and droplet deformation characteristics will be summarized from experimental observations and theoretical analyses in available literature. [Pg.238]

Based on personal experience, the what-if analysis and HAZOP seem to be the most user-friendly methodologies to use. In the following example we describe the what-if analysis procedure and sample checklists typically used for chemicals used in wastewater treatment. Moreover, guide words, meanings, process parameters, and procedures for conducting HAZOP are also presented. [Pg.87]

Parametric uncertainty A great number of bacterial species carry out the transformations of organic load and nutrients in wastewater treatment processes without direct or easily comprehensible relationships between the microbial populations and viability. The role of each bacterial species is fuzzy [30], and aspects such as cellular physiology and its modeling are not easily understood from external measurements [18], [68]. As a first consequence, the kinetics of these transformations is often poorly or inadequately known [66]. Extensive efforts to model the kinetics have been undertaken, but these have not been successful to elucidate how yield coefficients, kinetic parameters and the bacterial population distribution change as a function of both, the influent composition and the operating conditions. [Pg.120]

O. Bernard, Z. Hadj-Sadok, D. Dochain, A. Genovesi, and J.P. Steyer. Dynamical model development and parameter identification for anaerobic wastewater treatment process. Biotechnol. Bioeng., 75(4) 424-438, 2001. [Pg.161]


See other pages where Treatment process parameters is mentioned: [Pg.248]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.145]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.363]    [Pg.2216]    [Pg.2216]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.46]    [Pg.253]    [Pg.88]    [Pg.92]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.701]    [Pg.486]    [Pg.223]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.256]    [Pg.804]    [Pg.255]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.194]    [Pg.44]    [Pg.396]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.556 ]




SEARCH



Process parameters

Processes treatment

Processing parameters

© 2024 chempedia.info