Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Transformations of the Bound Substrate

In practice, measurement of the individual rate constants or equilibrium constants for these various chemical steps requires specialized methodologies, such as transient state kinetics (see Johnson, 1992, Copeland, 2000, and Fersht, 1999, for discussion of such methods) and/or a variety of biophysical methods for measuring equilibrium binding (Copeland, 2000). These specialized methods are beyond the scope of the present text. More commonly, the overall rate of reaction progress after ES complex formation is quantified experimentally in terms of a composite rate constant given the symbol km. [Pg.26]

Although fccat is a composite rate constant, representing multiple chemical steps in catalysis, it is dominated by the rate-limiting chemical step, which most often is the formation of the bound transition state complex ES from the encounter complex ES. Thus, to a first approximation, we can consider kCM to be a first-order rate constant for the transition from ES to ES  [Pg.26]

The Gibbs free energy for the transition from ES to ES is related to the value of kC3, as described by Equation (2.3)  [Pg.26]

From Equation (2.4) we see that the overall activation energy for the enzyme-catalyzed reaction is related to the second-order rate constant defined by the ratio [Pg.26]


The mixed-type inhibitors combine the effects of the competitive and noncompetitive inhibitors binding at the active center decreases the affinity of the enzyme towards the substrate molecule and also decreases the rate of transformation of the bound substrate. In their presence, the straight line plots intersect in the fourth quarter of the Lineweaver-Burk plot, according to equation ... [Pg.325]

In this complex, enhanced rate of H-transfer to the bound pyridinium salt substrate is observed. This represents the first example of accelerated 1,4-dihydropyridine to pyridinium H-transfer (transreduction) in a synthetic molecular macrocyclic receptor-substrate complex. Therefore, such a synthetic catalyst displays some of the characteristic features which molecular catalysts should possess. It provides both a receptor site for substrate binding and a reactive site for transformation of the bound substrate. Consequently it is of interest as both as enzyme model, and as a new type of efficient and selective chemical reagent (278). [Pg.394]

In all cases an enzymic process is composed of several consecutive reaction steps. Even the simplest Michaelis-Menten type rapid equihbrium mechanism involves two steps, the binding of the substrate, S, to a specific site in the active centre, and the chemical transformation of the bound S to product P, during which the enzyme becomes free again. The Michaelis constant characterizes the affinity of the enzyme to its... [Pg.312]

Some strategies used for the preparation of support-bound thiols are listed in Table 8.1. Oxidative thiolation of lithiated polystyrene has been used to prepare polymeric thiophenol (Entry 1, Table 8.1). Polystyrene functionalized with 2-mercaptoethyl groups has been prepared by radical addition of thioacetic acid to cross-linked vinyl-polystyrene followed by hydrolysis of the intermediate thiol ester (Entry 2, Table 8.1). A more controllable introduction of thiol groups, suitable also for the selective transformation of support-bound substrates, is based on nucleophilic substitution with thiourea or potassium thioacetate. The resulting isothiouronium salts and thiol acetates can be saponified, preferably under reductive conditions, to yield thiols (Table 8.1). Thiol acetates have been saponified on insoluble supports with mercaptoethanol [1], propylamine [2], lithium aluminum hydride [3], sodium or lithium borohydride, alcoholates, or hydrochloric acid (Table 8.1). [Pg.239]

Most of these procedures are incompatible with common linkers, and are therefore unsuitable for the transformation of support-bound substrates into carboxylic acids. A more versatile approach for this purpose is the saponification of carboxylic esters. Saponifications with KOH or NaOH usually proceed smoothly on hydrophilic supports, such as Tentagel [19] or polyacrylamides, but not on cross-linked polystyrene. Esters linked to hydrophobic supports are more conveniently saponified with LiOH [45] or KOSiMe3 in THF or dioxane (Table 13.11). Alternatively, palladium(O)-mediated saponification of allyl esters [94] can be used to prepare acids on cross-linked polystyrene (Entries 9 and 10, Table 13.11). Fmoc-protected amines are not deprotected under these conditions [160],... [Pg.345]

Supramolecular reactivity and catalysis thus involve two main steps binding, which selects the substrate, and transformation of the bound species into products within the supermolecule formed. Both steps take part in the molecular recognition of the productive substrate and require the correct molecular information in the reactive receptor. Compared to molecular reactivity, a binding step is involved that precedes the reaction itself. Catalysis additionally comprises a third step, the release of the substrate. [Pg.55]

Often proteins act on the molecules they bind. Enzymes catalyze the transformation of the bound molecules (their substrates) into another chemical species. Ion channels are able to pump bound ions from one side of the cell membrane to the other. Chains of myosin molecules pass actin along from one myosin molecule to another in muscle. [Pg.13]

The absolnte confignrations of both the Diels-Alder and the Michael addncts with R = Ph were elncidated by transformation into known compounds. In the case of the D-A reaction, the (2S,3S) enantiomer was formed in excess, indicating that cyclopentadiene attacks from the Si face of the dienophile. Similarly, nucleophilic attack to the enone in the Michael reaction was shown to occur from the Si face. These results suggest that the Re face of the bound substrate is shielded efficiently by the DNA in both reaction classes (Fig. 14). [Pg.19]

What assumptions are made in this model with regard to the rate of the bound substrate being chemically transformed into bound product in the active site ... [Pg.605]

The present discussion was intended to analyze molecular recognition in substrate binding. Of course molecular recognition also plays a major role in molecular catalysis and transport processes where transformation or translocation of the bound substrates is brought about by a suitably functionalized receptor molecule. These most important aspects are however beyond the scope of this presentation. One may just note, for the sake of illustration, that for instance cysteinyl derivatives of receptor (12 b) display marked chiral recognition in transacylation reactions with optically active substrates [26] and that dicarboxylate-dicarboxamide analogs of (12 b) allow pH regulation of the Ca /K selectivity in competitive transport of calcium and potassium ions [27]. Further information about the results obtained in the areas of molecular catalysis and transport may be found respectively in the references [28] and [29] and in the references cited therein. [Pg.182]

Solid-phase synthesis (Section 26.8) A technique of synthesis whereby the starting material is covalently bound to a solid polymer bead and reactions are carried out on the bound substrate. After the desired transformations have been effected, the product is cleaved from the polymer. [Pg.1250]

The transformations discussed in Sects. 2.2-2.3 highlight several important features of the RCM process. Firstly, the compatibility of the ruthenium initiator 3 with a wide range of functional groups including epoxides, vinyl iodides, thia-zoles and alcohols is demonstrated. The versatility of 3 is further illustrated in Sect. 2.3, where it is used to effect RCM of polymer-bound substrates. Previously, the molybdenum complex 1 has been reported to be more sensitive than 3 [19]. Experiments reported here are consistent with this view (Sect. 2.2.3) [14b]. [Pg.101]

Another possible explanation for the limitations of catalytic antibodies raised against TSA can be found in the different accessibility of the active site. In the case of natural enzymes, it is that their catalytic machinery and bound substrates are often buried. This feature isolates from the solvent the reactive functionalities that mediate chemical transformations. On the contrary, in antibody catalysis, the moieties of the bound haptens that mimic the TS are often positioned near the entrance of the antibody-combining site. This disparity in the overall architecture of natural enzymes and catalytic antibodies is undoubtedly a factor in the lower catalytic... [Pg.335]

The Sharpless asymmetric dehydroxylation of resin-bound olefins was monitored using 3H, 13C and HMQC HRMAS NMR.63 The authors found 13C HRMAS NMR to be particularly suited to evaluating the progress of this reaction and permitted the enantiomeric excesses of the products to be determined before they were cleaved from the support. Most importantly, they were able to evaluate the types of substrates amenable to this reaction on solid supports, showing the ability of HRMAS NMR to contribute to synthetic questions. Transformation of the unnatural amino acid Lys(NH2) on a poly (ethylene glycol)-dimethylacrylamide (PEGA) resin to 6-hydroxynorleucine was confirmed by application of TOCSY HRMAS experiments.64... [Pg.273]

Once activated, the substrates are transformed via a number of different possible steps including ligand migration, insertion, elimination or extrusion, and external attack on bound substrate. Of these, the last is most easily envisioned—a reagent not coordinated to the metal center of the catalyst attacks the bound substrate whose coordination has rendered it chemically reactive. [Pg.82]

A reaction looked at earlier simulates borate inhibition of serine proteinases.33 Resorufin acetate (234) is proposed as an attractive substrate to use with chymotrypsin since the absorbance of the product is several times more intense than that formed when the more usual p-nitrophcnyl acetate is used as a substrate. The steady-state values are the same for the two substrates, which is expected if the slow deacylation step involves a common intermediate. Experiments show that the acetate can bind to chymotrypsin other than at the active site.210 Brownian dynamics simulations of the encounter kinetics between the active site of an acetylcholinesterase and a charged substrate together with ah initio quantum chemical calculations using the 3-21G set to probe the transformation of the Michaelis complex into a covalently bound tetrahedral intermediate have been carried out.211 The Glu 199 residue located near the enzyme active triad boosts acetylcholinesterase activity by increasing the encounter rate due to the favourable modification of the electric field inside the enzyme and by stabilization of the TS for the first chemical step of catalysis.211... [Pg.73]

After the incubation, the unbound molecules are washed away, leaving behind the bound ones, anchored onto the antibody sites. Now a clear solution of a colorforming reagent (chromogenic substrate) such as, 3,3, 5,5 -tetramethylbenzidine is added to the mixture. The enzyme conjugate, bound to antibody sites on the wall, reacts with the chromogenic substrate forming a blue color. The enzyme catalyzes the transformation of the substrate into a product which reacts with the... [Pg.109]

Enzyme activity may be inhibited by substances that inactivate the enzyme or occupy the active site of the enzyme before the substrate has a chance. As a result, the rate of transformation of the substrate to product is slowed. In competitive inhibition, similar substrates (or analogs) can bind to the same active site on the enzyme. Therefore, they compete with each other for the same active sites. This inhibition process is reversible and can be prevented or slowed by increasing the substrate concentration or by diluting the inhibitor in the solution. In this case, the enzyme already bound to the substrate is not inhibited. The effect of the competitive inhibitor (I) on the rate of enzyme reaction in Equation (5.129), Equation (5.130), Equation (5.131), and Equation (5.132) yields ... [Pg.315]

The second approach involves directly computing the reaction coordinate for transformation of the enzyme-bound substrate(s) into product(s). Quantum mechanical treatments (see Section 2) are necessary to describe bond-making and breaking processes, however, and such methods are generally too expensive to apply to the whole enzyme-substrate system. Still, if this problem could somehow be circumvented (as has been attempted with QM/MM methods see below), then assumptions about the structures of species along the reaction coordinate could be avoided. [Pg.203]


See other pages where Transformations of the Bound Substrate is mentioned: [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.27]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.31]    [Pg.33]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.101]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.28]    [Pg.7]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.484]    [Pg.1083]    [Pg.512]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.172]    [Pg.696]    [Pg.408]    [Pg.659]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.298]    [Pg.123]    [Pg.197]    [Pg.317]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.95]   


SEARCH



The Substrate

© 2024 chempedia.info