Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Hydrophilic support

PERVAP 2200 Sulzer Chemtech PVA cross-linked/PAN support Hydrophilic... [Pg.49]

Ag(I) Hydroxy-oximes, Acorga P-5100 TIB PS Hydrophilic support Hydrophilic support [21,97-99]... [Pg.394]

Figure 4.4 Schematics of (a) splitting and spreading ofa vesicle on a solid-supported thiolipid monolayer and (b) unrolling and spreading of a vesicle on a solid-supported hydrophilic spacer. Figure 4.4 Schematics of (a) splitting and spreading ofa vesicle on a solid-supported thiolipid monolayer and (b) unrolling and spreading of a vesicle on a solid-supported hydrophilic spacer.
The development of the theory of surface forces by Derjaguin, Churaev, and Muller (353) made it possible to carry out quantitative estimations of wetting in relation to the properties of the solid support (hydrophilic or hydrophobic surface of SiC>2, in particular) as well as of the effect of the interaction between the wetting substances and the surface. [Pg.634]

Support hydrophilic, glass not permeable to organic components and gases, T < Tg, water content (a ), plasticizer... [Pg.839]

Fig. 4 CHCA affinity MALDI sample preparation of peptides. This technique takes advantage of prestructured sample supports (hydrophilic sample anchors surrounded by a hydrophobic support) and the observation that microcrystalline CHCA has a high RP affinity and binding capacity for peptides. It integrates sample purification and concentration in the last step of the sample preparation. Typically 0.5-2.0 p,L of acidified sample solution (pH 1.5-2.5) is deposited onto one matrix spot measuring 400, 600, or 800 (jtm in diameter. Depending on the pimity and concentration of the samples, they are either allowed to dry at ambient temperature (option 1) or removed after a defined incubation time, e.g., 3 min (option 2). In either case, all samples are washed once or multiple times with a larger volume of acidified water (3-8 xL) before they are analyzed. AH these steps can be performed manually or automated using a pipetting robot as shown on the left. If the samples contain a lot of undesired contaminants that are difficult to completely wash away, option 2 is preferred. If their concentration is very low, the affinity purification yields benefit from longer incubation times because the samples volumes continuously shrink over time until all solvent is evaporated. Therefore, if the contaminants can easily be washed away, option 1 is recommended because it provides maximum sample concentration and is easier to perform than option 2... Fig. 4 CHCA affinity MALDI sample preparation of peptides. This technique takes advantage of prestructured sample supports (hydrophilic sample anchors surrounded by a hydrophobic support) and the observation that microcrystalline CHCA has a high RP affinity and binding capacity for peptides. It integrates sample purification and concentration in the last step of the sample preparation. Typically 0.5-2.0 p,L of acidified sample solution (pH 1.5-2.5) is deposited onto one matrix spot measuring 400, 600, or 800 (jtm in diameter. Depending on the pimity and concentration of the samples, they are either allowed to dry at ambient temperature (option 1) or removed after a defined incubation time, e.g., 3 min (option 2). In either case, all samples are washed once or multiple times with a larger volume of acidified water (3-8 xL) before they are analyzed. AH these steps can be performed manually or automated using a pipetting robot as shown on the left. If the samples contain a lot of undesired contaminants that are difficult to completely wash away, option 2 is preferred. If their concentration is very low, the affinity purification yields benefit from longer incubation times because the samples volumes continuously shrink over time until all solvent is evaporated. Therefore, if the contaminants can easily be washed away, option 1 is recommended because it provides maximum sample concentration and is easier to perform than option 2...
Kim et al. (2009) fabricated membrane for propylene recovery from off-gas by incorporating silica nanoparticles of size 12-400 nm in a PDMS layer coated on a polysulfone (PSf) support. Hydrophilic fumed silica (Aerosil 200, particle size 12 nm) or silica nanoparticles prepared by a sol-gel method (particle size 300-A00 mn) were incorporated in the PDMS layer to make asymmetric MMMs. To prevent particle agglomeration, silane coupling was attempted using three types of silane agents 3-mercaptopropyltrimethoxysilane, 3-aminopropyl-trimethoxylsilane, and 3-methacryloxypropyl-trimethoxylsilane. Propylene/nitrogen mixture (volume ratio 15/85) was cooled to about 0°C before entering the membrane cell as feed to make propylene more condensable and a vacuum was applied on the permeate side. [Pg.603]

New templated polymer support materials have been developed for use as re versed-phase packing materials. Pore size and particle size have not usually been precisely controlled by conventional suspension polymerization. A templated polymerization is used to obtain controllable pore size and particle-size distribution. In this technique, hydrophilic monomers and divinylbenzene are formulated and filled into pores in templated silica material, at room temperature. After polymerization, the templated silica material is removed by base hydrolysis. The surface of the polymer may be modified in various ways to obtain the desired functionality. The particles are useful in chromatography, adsorption, and ion exchange and as polymeric supports of catalysts (39,40). [Pg.10]

High-performance size exclusion chromatography is used for the characterization of copolymers, as well as for biopolymers (3). The packings for analyses of water-soluble polymers mainly consist of 5- to 10-/Am particles derived from deactivated silica or hydrophilic polymeric supports. For the investigation of organosoluble polymers, cross-linked polystyrene beads are still the column packing of choice. [Pg.219]

SynChropak GPC supports are bonded with y-glycidoxypropylsilane by a proprietary process that results in a thin, neutral hydrophilic layer that totally covers the silanol sites of the silica. The silica backbone prevents the supports from swelling. [Pg.306]

Lipases catalyse reactions at interfaces, and to obtain a high rate of interesterification the reaction systems should have a large area of interface between the water immiscible reactant phase and the more hydrophilic phase which contains the lipase. This can be achieved by supporting the lipase on the surface of macroporous particles. [Pg.331]

For Yiv > YPv> where y v and Ypv are the surface tensions of liquid and protein, respectively, AFads increases with increasing ysv, predicting decreasing polymer adsorption. An example of this is phosphate buffer saline where y]v = 72.9 mJ/m2 and Ypv is usually between 65 and 70mJ/m2 for most proteins [5]. Therefore, supports for gel-permeation and affinity chromatography should be as hydrophilic as possible in order to minimize undesirable adsorption effects. [Pg.137]

Porous glass (PG) modified with covalently adsorbed poly(p-nitrophenyl acrylate), as described in Sect. 4.1, turned out to be a highly suitable carrier for immobilization of various biospecific ligands and enzymes. When the residual active ester groups of the carrier were blocked by ethanolamine, the immobilized ligands when bound to the solid support via hydrophilic and flexible poly(2-hydroxyethyl acrylamide). The effective biospecific binding provided by the ligands... [Pg.170]

More recently, Silva et a/.447,448 have found that the temperature coefficients of dEa /dT for a number of stepped Au surfaces do not fit into the above correlation, being much smaller than expected. These authors have used this observation to support their view of the hydrophilicity sequence the low 9 (rs0/97 on stepped surfaces occurs because steps randomize the orientation of water dipoles. Besides being against common concepts of reactivity in surface science and catalysis, this interpretation implies that stepped surfaces are less hydrophilic than flat surfaces. According to the plot in Fig. 25, an opposite explanation can be offered the small BEod0/dT of stepped surfaces is due to the strong chemisorption energy of water molecules on these surfaces. [Pg.184]

Other data support the above picture. Hexanol adsorbs very weakly on Ag(l 10), more weakly than expected, and in any case less than on the (100) face.440 Such a poor adsorption on (110) faces has been explained in terms of steric hindrance caused by the superficial rails of atoms. Consistently, adsorption on the (110) face of Cu is vanishing small.587 Predictions based on a linear regression analysis of the data for pentanol (nine metals) give a value of-12 kJ mol 1 for Cu(l 10) and about -16 kJ mol 1 for Au(110). No data are available for polycrystalline Au, but Au(l 11) is placed in the correct position in the adsorption of hexanol.910 Thus, these data confirm the hydrophilicity sequence Hg < Au < Ag and the crystal face sequence for fee metals (111) < (100) < (110). [Pg.188]

Another case study supporting the AX hydrophilicity scale is the adsorption of terminal diols. Figure 28 shows that adsorption on Au911 is weaker than on Hg912 as expected, while adsorption increases with the number of carbon atoms almost in parallel for the two metals. It is intriguing that the adsorption of 1,4-butanediol at the air/solution interface is weaker than on Hg328 and is of the same order of magnitude as on Au. [Pg.188]


See other pages where Hydrophilic support is mentioned: [Pg.191]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.6327]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.191]    [Pg.236]    [Pg.116]    [Pg.626]    [Pg.370]    [Pg.6327]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.54]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.451]    [Pg.481]    [Pg.43]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.544]    [Pg.529]    [Pg.271]    [Pg.115]    [Pg.440]    [Pg.358]    [Pg.291]    [Pg.641]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.11]    [Pg.220]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.77]    [Pg.135]    [Pg.151]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.613]    [Pg.200]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.177 , Pg.215 ]




SEARCH



Controlled porous hydrophilic support

Hydrophilic-polymer-based support

© 2024 chempedia.info