Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Toxicity assessment for environmental protection

Li et al. [37-39] described the use of the bacterial species Bacillus subtilis and Bacillus licheniformis entrapped between a polycarbonate membrane and a Teflon-covered DO probe. The differences between the steady-state signals before and after exposure to the test samples were used as a measure of the sample BOD levels. Riedel et al. [32-33] described the use of the yeast Trichosporon cutaneum, or both T. cutaneum and B. subtilis, sandwiched between a dialysis membrane and a polyethylene-covered DO probe. In these cases, the sensor response times were speeded up by measuring the initial rates of change of the signals. In this way, measurements could be made within 30 s rather than within 15-20 min for the steady-state approach [33]. [Pg.199]

In general, toxic substances exhibit inhibitory effects that are a function of the concentration of the material. Thus, by carrying out a number of such measurements, over a range of concentrations, it is possible to establish a pattern of responses (see Fig. 7.1). This information may be used to determine the toxicity of the test material the concentration that brings about a 50% measured effect (the EC50 ) is widely used as a measure of the material s toxicity. The pattern of responses may also be used to determine the required dilution of the material needed to reduce its toxicity to a suitably low level before discharge for further treatment or direct to the environment. A particularly important application of this approach is in the protection of wastewater treatment plants sewage farms which in [Pg.200]

Redox mediated whole cell biosensors for toxicity assessment [Pg.202]


Redox Mediated Whole Cell Biosensors for Toxicity Assessment and Environmental Protection... [Pg.195]

California Air Resources Board/Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, Benzol a] pyrene as a Toxic Air Contaminant (1994) Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment/California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Toxics Hot Spot Program Risk Assessment Guideline, Part II Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Factors (1998) Collins et al. (1998). [Pg.470]

Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency, Air Toxics Hot Spot Program Risk Assessment Guideline Part II Technical Support Document for Describing Available Cancer Potency Factors, 1998. [Pg.540]

US EPA (1996b) Guidelines for reproductive toxicity risk assessment. US Environmental Protection Agency. Fed Regist, 61 56274-56322. [Pg.164]

USEPA, General Principles for Performing Aggregate Exposure and Risk Assessments, Report No. 6040, Office of Pesticide Programs and Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances, US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC, USA, 21 November, 2001 (website http //www.epa.gov/pesticides/oppfeadl/trac/science/). [Pg.387]

Health Effects Assessment for Hexavalent Chromium, EPA/540/1-86-019, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Sept. 1984 Toxicological Profile for Chromium, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR), ASTDR/TP-88/10,1989. [Pg.151]

The comprehensive and detailed assessment of the risks required for a safety-case can only be satisfactorily carried out for major installations with the aid of computer software. Suites of programmes for quantitative risk analysis have been developed over the past decade by consulting firms specializing in safety and environmental protection. Typical of the software available is the SAFETI (Suite for Assessment of Flammability Explosion and Toxic Impact) suite of programs developed by DNV Technica Ltd. These programs were initially developed for the authorities in the Netherlands, as a response to the Seveso Directives of the EU (which requires the development of safety cases and hazard reviews). The programs have subsequently been developed further and extended, and are widely used in the preparation of safety cases see Pitblado el al. (1990). [Pg.396]

The purpose of this chapter is not to discuss the merits, or lack thereof, of using plasma cholinesterase inhibition as an adverse effect in quantitative risk assessments for chlorpyrifos or other organophosphate pesticides. A number of regulatory agencies consider the inhibition of plasma cholinesterase to be an indicator of exposure, not of toxicity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, at this point, continues to use this effect as the basis for calculating the reference doses for chlorpyrifos, and it is thus used here for assessing risks. [Pg.36]

In a study by Andersson et al. [30], the possibilities to use quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict physical chemical and ecotoxico-logical properties of approximately 200 different plastic additives have been assessed. Physical chemical properties were predicted with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite, Version 3.20. Aquatic ecotoxicity data were calculated by QSAR models in the Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.), version 3.3, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as described by Rahmberg et al. [31]. To evaluate the applicability of the QSAR-based characterization factors, they were compared to experiment-based characterization factors for the same substances taken from the USEtox organics database [32], This was done for 39 plastic additives for which experiment-based characterization factors were already available. [Pg.16]

US Environmental Protection Agency (1994). Methods for assessing the toxicity of sediment-associated contaminants with estuarine and marine amphipods. EPA 600/ R-94/025. Office of Research and Development, Narragansett, RI. [Pg.394]

EPA. 1992c. Di-w-octylphthalate exposure report for delisting petition. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. Memorandum from Annett Nold, Exposure Assessment Branch, Exposure Evaluation Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics to Ken Mitchell, Toxics Release Inventory Management Staff, Economics and Technology Division, Office of Pollution Prevention and Toxics. September 21, 1992. [Pg.119]

EPA. 1988f Method T02. Method for the determination of volatile organic compounds in ambient air by carbon molecular sieve adsorption and GC/MS. Compendium of methods for the determination of toxic organic compounds in ambient air. Atmospheric Research and Exposure Assessment Laboratory, Office of Research and Development, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, RTP, NC. EPA/600/4-89/017. [Pg.264]

Battelle and. Crump KS, and Co., Inc. 1986. Quantitative risk assessment for 1,4-dichlorobenzene prepared for Exposure Evaluation Division. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances, under Contract No. 68-02-4246. [Pg.240]

EPA Health Assessment Document for 1,2-Dichloroethane (Ethylene Dichloride). Final Report—EPA/600/8-84/006F. Washington, DC, US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Toxic Substances, September... [Pg.323]

U.S. EPA (Environmental Protection Agency) (1991) Guidelines for developmental toxicity risk assessment. Eed Reg 56 63798-63824... [Pg.294]


See other pages where Toxicity assessment for environmental protection is mentioned: [Pg.199]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.199]    [Pg.201]    [Pg.202]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.296]    [Pg.41]    [Pg.419]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.279]    [Pg.475]    [Pg.2209]    [Pg.545]    [Pg.910]    [Pg.604]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.996]    [Pg.1055]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.328]    [Pg.349]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.357]    [Pg.861]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.343]    [Pg.39]    [Pg.22]   


SEARCH



Environmental assessment

Environmental protection

Toxicity assessment

Toxicity assessment for environmental

© 2024 chempedia.info