Toxicity assessment for environmental

Barata C, Alanon P, Gutierrez-Alonso S, Riva MC, Fernandez C, Tarazona JV (2008) A Daphnia magna feeding bioassay as a cost effective and ecological relevant sublethal toxicity test for environmental risk assessment of toxic effluents. Sci Total Environ 405(l-3) 78-86... 

Kimmel CA, Kimmel GL, Euling SY (2006) Developmental and reproductive toxicity risk assessment for environmental agents. In Hood RD (ed) Developmental and reproductive toxicology, a practical approach. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL... 

Cultivation of the heart urchin Echinocardium cordatum and validation of its use in marine toxicity testing for environmental risk assessment... 

Schipper, C.A., Dubbeldam, M., Feist, S.W., Rietjens, I.M.C.M., Murk, A.J. (2008b). Cultivation of the heart urchin Echinocardium cordatum and validation of its use in marine toxicity testing for environmental risk assessment. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 364, 11-18. 

SETAC Europe, (1993). Guidance document on sediment toxicity assessment for freshwater and marine environments. In Hill, I.R., Matthiessen, P, Heinbach, F. (Eds.), Workshop on sediment toxicity assessment, Renesse, The Netherlands, 8-10 November, 1993. Society of Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, Europe 105 pp. 

As discussed above, the risk of chemicals in the environment is dependent on both exposure and toxicity. Pathways through which organisms in the environment are exposed to chemicals are therefore key determinants of how safe (and therefore, how green ) a chemical is, and must be considered in moving towards a reduced risk or hazard approach to the production and use of chemicals. Fate in the environment is the principal determinant of exposure and designing chemicals for reduced hazard and risk to the environment involves consideration of processes that affect the chemical in the environment, in addition to toxicity. Assessment of environmental fate, including design of chemicals for nonpersistence, is discussed in detail in Chapter 16. 

Because of the numerous benefits of Toxkit assays, they can be used for sample testing even by small analytical laboratories and local monitoring stations for routine toxicity assessments of environmental samples as well as in emergencies. The use of standard organisms means that assays can be standardized and that repeatable results can be obtained in different laboratories. Another, not unimportant aspect is that conducting toxicity assays on microorganisms does not require the consent of an ethical committee.77 Table 9.3 provides information on microbioassays commercially available in kit form (Toxkit).73... 

Redox Mediated Whole Cell Biosensors for Toxicity Assessment and Environmental Protection... 

We must thus recognize that the toxic assessment of environmental pollutants is not always a satisfactory basis for the setting of environmental standards ... 

For chemicals acting by a uniform mode in different organisms (e.g. nonspecific toxicants), interspecies extrapolations (Chapter 8) are a further means of obtaining toxicity data for environmental risk assessments. When experimental results are unavailable, they can be used with QSARs to fill data gaps. Biologists may prefer interspecies extrapolations, as they proceed from real (i.e. experimental) data. For mathematicians, chemists and statisticians, QSARs may be more reliable, as their input parameters, chemical structures and physico-chemical properties are usually considered to be subject to much less variability as compared to biological data. In practice, there mostly remains only the pragmatic point of view all available information should be collected, scrutinized expertly, and then used (or rejected) for hazard and risk assessments. 

This chapter s characterization of lead as a neurotoxic hazard does not include detailed dose—response relationships with various levels of biomarkers such as PbB linked to various neurotoxic outcomes. The topics of dose/ exposure metrics and defining full-spectrum dose—response relationships are presented in the next part, the section dealing with the elements of human health risk assessment for environmental lead. Here, for ease of discussion, only a broad yardstick is provided for toxic lead exposures. Specifically, general PbB ranges associated with the various categories of lead neurotoxicity, especially in children, are noted. 

Health Effects Assessment for Hexavalent Chromium, EPA/540/1-86-019, United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), Sept. 1984 Toxicological Profile for Chromium, Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ASTDR), ASTDR/TP-88/10,1989. 

Most human or environmental healtli hazards can be evaluated by dissecting tlie analysis into four parts liazard identification, dose-response assessment or hazard assessment, exposure assessment, and risk characterization. For some perceived healtli liazards, tlie risk assessment might stop with tlie first step, liazard identification, if no adverse effect is identified or if an agency elects to take regulatory action witliout furtlier analysis. Regarding liazard identification, a hazard is defined as a toxic agent or a set of conditions that luis the potential to cause adverse effects to hmnan health or tlie environment. Healtli hazard identification involves an evaluation of various forms of information in order to identify the different liaz.ards. Dose-response or toxicity assessment is required in an overall assessment responses/cffects can vary widely since all chemicals and contaminants vary in their capacity to cause adverse effects. This step frequently requires that assumptions be made to relate... 

There is a continuing interest in the development of biomarker assays for use in environmental risk assessment. As discussed elsewhere (Section 16.6), there are both scientific and ethical reasons for seeking to introduce in vitro assays into protocols for the regulatory testing of chemicals. Animal welfare organizations would like to see the replacement of toxicity tests by more animal-friendly alternatives for all types of risk assessment—whether for environmental risks or for human health. 

At the practical level, an ideal mechanistic biomarker should be simple to use, sensitive, relatively specific, stable, and usable on material that can be obtained by nondestructive sampling (e.g., blood or skin). A tall order, no doubt, and no biomarker yet developed has all of these attributes. However, the judicious use of combinations of biomarkers can overcome the shortcomings of individual assays. The main point to emphasize is that the resources so far invested in the development of biomarker technology for environmental risk assessment has been very small (cf the investment in biomarkers for use in medicine). Knowledge of toxic mechanisms of organic pollutants is already substantial (especially of pesticides), and it grows apace. The scientific basis is already there for technological advance it all comes down to a question of investment. 

Measurement of exposure can be made by determining levels of toxic chemicals in human serum or tissue if the chemicals of concern persist in tissue or if the exposure is recent. For most situations, neither of these conditions is met. As a result, most assessments of exposure depend primarily on chemical measurements in environmental media coupled with semi-quantitative assessments of environmental pathways. However, when measurements in human tissue are possible, valuable exposure information can be obtained, subject to the same limitations cited above for environmental measurement methodology. Interpretation of tissue concentration data is dependent on knowledge of the absorption, excretion, metabolism, and tissue specificity characteristics for the chemical under study. The toxic hazard posed by a particular chemical will depend critically upon the concentration achieved at particular target organ sites. This, in turn, depends upon rates of absorption, transport, and metabolic alteration. Metabolic alterations can involve either partial inactivation of toxic material or conversion to chemicals with increased or differing toxic properties. 

In terms of environmental metrics to assess processes, it is hopefully clear that a considerable testing burden exists to assess potential environmental hazards that lead to a credible risk assessment. At a first pass, one would typically screen compounds from an environmental hazard perspective to assess their tendency for persistence, bioaccumulation and toxicity. Depending on the final application of the compoimd, one might avoid commercial production of a particular compound, or one might devise processes that would use the... 

The purpose of this chapter is not to discuss the merits, or lack thereof, of using plasma cholinesterase inhibition as an adverse effect in quantitative risk assessments for chlorpyrifos or other organophosphate pesticides. A number of regulatory agencies consider the inhibition of plasma cholinesterase to be an indicator of exposure, not of toxicity. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, at this point, continues to use this effect as the basis for calculating the reference doses for chlorpyrifos, and it is thus used here for assessing risks. 

This gives an example of fate modeling in which the risks of an insect growth inhibitor, CGA-72662, in aquatic environments were assessed using a combination of the SWRRB and EXAMS mathematical models.. Runoff of CGA-72662 from agricultural watersheds was estimated using the SWRRB model. The runoff data were then used to estimate the loading of CGA-72662 into the EXAMS model for aquatic environments. EXAMS was used to estimate the maximum concentrations of CGA-72662 that would occur in various compartments of the defined ponds and lakes. The maximum expected environmental concentrations of CGA-72662 in water were then compared with acute and chronic toxicity data for CGA-72662 in fish and aquatic invertebrates in order to establish a safety factor for CGA-72662 in aquatic environments. 

For a realistic risk assessment, the environmental fate, exposure levels and toxicity of the compound must be considered in an integrated fashion. 

---