Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Physical chemical prediction

In the case of chemoinformatics this process of abstraction will be performed mostly to gain knowledge about the properties of compounds. Physical, chemical, or biological data of compounds will be associated with each other or with data on the structure of a compound. These pieces of information wQl then be analyzed by inductive learning methods to obtain a model that allows one to make predictions. [Pg.8]

To formulate a model is to put together pieces of knowledge about a particular system into a consistent pattern that can form the basis for (1) interpretation of the past history of the system and (2) prediction of the future of the system. To be credible and useful, any model of a physical, chemical or biological system must rely on both scientific fundamentals and observations of the world around us. High-quality observational data are the basis upon which our understanding of the environment rests. However, observations themselves are not very useful unless the results can be interpreted in some kind of model. Thus observations and modeling go hand in hand. [Pg.62]

Organophosphate Ester Hydraulic Fluids. Most of the monitoring information available for components of organophosphate ester hydraulic fluids pertains to water and sediments, with only a few reports of organophosphate esters in soils and very few reporting air or rain concentrations (see Section 5.4). There is insufficient monitoring information to demonstrate that sediments and soils are the dominant environmental sinks, as the physical/chemical properties predict. [Pg.298]

In a study by Andersson et al. [30], the possibilities to use quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models to predict physical chemical and ecotoxico-logical properties of approximately 200 different plastic additives have been assessed. Physical chemical properties were predicted with the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Estimation Program Interface (EPI) Suite, Version 3.20. Aquatic ecotoxicity data were calculated by QSAR models in the Toxicity Estimation Software Tool (T.E.S.T.), version 3.3, from U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, as described by Rahmberg et al. [31]. To evaluate the applicability of the QSAR-based characterization factors, they were compared to experiment-based characterization factors for the same substances taken from the USEtox organics database [32], This was done for 39 plastic additives for which experiment-based characterization factors were already available. [Pg.16]

Prediction of chemical occurrence is a difficult task that depends on multitude of factors (i.e., physical-chemical properties, climate conditions, amount of product, mode of application, and exchange processes), but these models in combination with laboratory analysis can be a powerful tool for evaluating the chemical occurrence in the environment. [Pg.26]

Artola-Garicano et al. [27] compared their measured removals of AHTN and HHCB [24] to the predicted removal of these compounds by the wastewater treatment plant model Simple Treat 3.0. Simple Treat is a fugacity-based, nine-box model that breaks the treatment plant process into influent, primary settler, primary sludge, aeration tank, solid/liquid separator, effluent, and waste sludge and is a steady-state, nonequilibrium model [27]. The model inputs include information on the emission scenario of the FM, FM physical-chemical properties, and FM biodegradation rate in activated sludge. [Pg.113]

Fig. 5. Physical-chemical parameters as a function of residue number for hamster PrP (Inouye and Kirschner, 1998). The parameters (arbitrary scale) are charge at pH 7 hydrophobicity a-helix (solid), /8-strand (dashed) turn (solid), coil (dashed) a-helical (solid) and /8-strand amphiphilicity (dashed). The predicted helices (Huang et al., 1994) are labeled HI, H2, H3, and H4, and the NMR-observed helices and /8-strands are A-C and SI, S2, respectively (James et al., 1997). Fig. 5. Physical-chemical parameters as a function of residue number for hamster PrP (Inouye and Kirschner, 1998). The parameters (arbitrary scale) are charge at pH 7 hydrophobicity a-helix (solid), /8-strand (dashed) turn (solid), coil (dashed) a-helical (solid) and /8-strand amphiphilicity (dashed). The predicted helices (Huang et al., 1994) are labeled HI, H2, H3, and H4, and the NMR-observed helices and /8-strands are A-C and SI, S2, respectively (James et al., 1997).
Based on the above examples, we can conclude that while localness is a desirable property, it is not sufficient for ensuring physically realistic predictions. Indeed, a key ingredient that is missing in all mixing models described thus far (except the FP and EMST70 models) is a description of the conditional joint scalar dissipation rates (e ) and their dependence on the chemical source term. For example, from the theory of premixed turbulent flames, we can expect that (eY F, f) will be strongly dependent on the chemical... [Pg.289]

Endrin ketone may react with photochemically generated hydroxyl radicals in the atmosphere, with an estimated half-life of 1.5 days (SRC 1995a). Available estimated physical/chemical properties of endrin ketone indicate that this compound will not volatilize from water however, significant bioconcentration in aquatic organisms may occur. In soils and sediments, endrin ketone is predicted to be virtually immobile however, detection of endrin ketone in groundwater and leachate samples at some hazardous waste sites suggests limited mobility of endrin ketone in certain soils (HazDat 1996). No other information could be found in the available literature on the environmental fate of endrin ketone in water, sediment, or soil. [Pg.109]

More than 50,000 chemicals are currently listed in the Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA) inventory, but physical-chemical properties are available for a relatively small percentage and biological endpoints for even less. The costs associated with thoroughly testing all chemicals are prohibitive, so models are needed to (1) predict the environmental effects of a new chemical, or (2) assess whether the chemical should be subject to a detailed testing regime (J ). Although models are available to... [Pg.148]

The most important tool in the arsenal of the product innovators is the ability to make predictions on which structure would lead to what properties, as well as what structure modifications would lead to what property modifications. The reverse research from a given set of properties to material that has these properties is even more important in creating new products and in modifying existing products. In most cases of molecular properties, it is more realistic to depend on empirical correlations between structure and properties. Forward and reverse searches are currently only available for simple physical-chemical properties, such as boiling points and densities such a facility is still not available for biological properties, such as narcotic and antibiotic activities. The development of such search engines would have a tremendous impact on the productivity of product innovators. [Pg.240]


See other pages where Physical chemical prediction is mentioned: [Pg.159]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.162]    [Pg.6]    [Pg.96]    [Pg.671]    [Pg.157]    [Pg.180]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.431]    [Pg.159]    [Pg.30]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.404]    [Pg.206]    [Pg.243]    [Pg.248]    [Pg.113]    [Pg.55]    [Pg.29]    [Pg.365]    [Pg.164]    [Pg.174]    [Pg.454]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.16]    [Pg.56]    [Pg.68]    [Pg.280]    [Pg.111]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.682]    [Pg.108]    [Pg.612]    [Pg.140]    [Pg.80]    [Pg.363]   


SEARCH



A Thermodynamic Approach for Predicting Physical-chemical Properties

Skill 7.6 Predicting physical and chemical properties based on the bonding in a substance

© 2024 chempedia.info