Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Tolerance quality level

The constituent elements of anode materials, other than the basis metal, are present whether as a result of being impurities in the raw materials or deliberate alloying additions. The impurity elements can be deleterious to anode performance, thus it is necessary to control the quality of the input materials in order to achieve the required anode performance. Since this will usually have an adverse impact on costs it is often desirable to tolerate a level of impurities and to overcome their action by making alloying additions. Alloying elements may also be added for other reasons which are important to anode production and performance. These matters are discussed in this section. [Pg.139]

Some EU Member States have also applied similar lifetime cancer risk estimates in judging tolerable risk levels. There is as yet no EU harmonized view on such default risk estimates at a policy level, although the starting point for the derivation of limit values for the general population in relation to the EU directives on ambient air and drinking water quality is the 10 lifetime risk for genotoxic carcinogens. [Pg.305]

The sensory evaluation differentiates between the stimulation threshold (a just detectable level where a perceptible but not yet definable deviation of the sample from the standard is observed) and the recognition threshold, a level where the odor is identifiable or creates odor problems (a no longer tolerable quality deterioration caused by a definite off odor and/or taste). The difference between a perceptible and identifiable level is usually only one to two steps of a geometric dilution series. Therefore, only undifferentiated odor and taste thresholds are given in Table 13-6, because of the very different sensitivities of individual testers. The perceptible (stimulation) levels of a less sensitive tester can overlap with the identifiable (recognition) level of another more sensitive tester. [Pg.422]

Burettes are very seldom tip- or end-heat strengthened as are pipettes, and they are therefore more prone to chipping or cracking. Burettes with removable tips and/or stopcocks can be useful for salvaging burettes that otherwise would be thrown away. Because the burette s calibration is exclusively on the column, removable tips and stopcocks have no effect on the buret s tolerance quality, nor should they imply the level of quality. [Pg.116]

Another opportunity for advancement in ethylbenzene synthesis is in the development of liquid phase processes that can handle low cost feedstocks, including dilute ethylene such as ethane/ethylene mixtures. The use of dilute ethylene has become increasingly attractive since it has the potential to debottleneck ethylene crackers. Currently higher temperature, vapor phase technologies can tolerate contaminants that enter with the dilute ethylene feed from FCC units. However, these same contaminants can accelerate catalyst aging in lower temperature, liquid phase operations because they are more strongly adsorbed at the lower temperatures. Acid catalysts that tolerate elevated levels of contaminants would facilitate the development of dilute ethylene-based processes. These same catalysts could be useful in applications where lower cost or lower quality benzene feeds are all that are available. [Pg.234]

Air quality standards have to take into account the seasonal fluctuation of tolerance. The level below which no effect will be seen on Norway spruce under field conditions is, however, much lower than that found in this fumigation experiment. The observed differences between graftings and seedlings and between both progenies (see Fig. 2) require greater numbers of replication for verification and interpretation because environmental stress and genetic disposition have to be separated from each other. [Pg.558]

For example, a 95% probability that a batch is as good as the AQL does not exclude other probabilities that the batch is worse (for example the 10% probability level, sometimes called the lot tolerance per cent defective (LTPD) or unacceptable quality level, can be several percentage points worse than the AQL). It is the relationship of AQL to LTPD that more closely identifies the quality risk in any statistical sampling plan, and illustrates why the use of national plans as simple accept and reject figures fails to tap their full potential. [Pg.89]

A recent round-robin test by Labnet [12] shows tolerances of 4% on part load efficiency and around 2% on full load efficiency. The implementing ecodesign measures are very sensitive to the performance of a central heating boiler system and so it is very important to increase the quality level of test institutes in terms of fuel quality, ambient parameters, and measure instruments. [Pg.724]

From the above discussion, it follows that the quality and conformance to tolerance of the product characteristics should be designed in and not left to the process engineer and quality engineer to increase to the required level. In order to do this, designers need to be aware of potential problems and shortfalls in the capability of their designs. They therefore need a technique which estimates process capability and quantifies design risks. [Pg.35]

The use of V-notches in a trough wall for overflow is more sensitive to leveling problems than the other designs, and for the same %- to Me-in. level tolerance produces a more severe non-uniform flow distribution. The quality of distribution from a V-notch is poor compared to the other types of trough distributor, but does have advantages in slurry systems [131]. It should not be used for critical distillation applications, but is good for heat transfer and where solids are in the system. [Pg.265]

Under poor operational conditions, tannin chemistry is a particularly forgiving form of internal treatment because it tolerates FW with significant variations in quality. It is capable of delivering clean, corrosion-free waterside surfaces in many types of boilers, despite low FW temperatures, high oxygen levels, and hardness ingress. It is especially suitable for use in smaller facilities that do not have the benefit of full-time, trained operators, and under on-off, batch process, or permanent low-fire circumstances. [Pg.409]

Only low total hardness levels can be tolerated (the ceiling is 0.5-3.0 ppm CaC03) or the program becomes too expensive. Chelant programs work particularly well with good quality FW. [Pg.437]

Quality control is intended to monitor and evaluate the performances of both food and human processes that contribute to food quality. The basic principle of this function is the control circle that involves (1) the taking of a process sample by the analysis or measuring unit, (2) determining whether process results meet set tolerances or limits, (3) judging the character and level of any discrepancy, and (4) application of corrective action to adjust the system to an acceptable level (Figure 7.1.1). A distinction is made between measuring and analysis, whereby the first involves direct measurements (e.g., pH, temperature) and the second involves taking samples, sample preparation, and actual analysis. ... [Pg.555]

Phosphorus and sulfur are present in pig iron and need to be removed in steel making because these elements, if present in any significant quantities in the steel, result in deterioration of its mechanical properties. The concentration normally tolerated is 0.04% for each of these elements, though in high-quality steels much lower levels are required. [Pg.432]

At Leica Biosystems Newcastle Ltd., invasive breast cancer tissue controls, demonstrating HER2 expression levels at 3+, 2+, 1+, and 0, are incorporated into all Oracle HER2 Bond IHC System cell line quality control runs. This ensures that control cell lines are validated as a viable assay control. The evaluation of control cell lines should always be performed within the context of appropriate tolerance limits. Subtle changes from batch to batch may occur, and it is the correct evaluation of the cell line staining patterns within appropriate tolerance limits that enables control cell lines to be utilized both in a commercial setting and as an EQA monitoring device. [Pg.111]


See other pages where Tolerance quality level is mentioned: [Pg.102]    [Pg.102]    [Pg.40]    [Pg.415]    [Pg.653]    [Pg.2793]    [Pg.93]    [Pg.436]    [Pg.266]    [Pg.414]    [Pg.392]    [Pg.74]    [Pg.450]    [Pg.1505]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.375]    [Pg.376]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.367]    [Pg.168]    [Pg.20]    [Pg.561]    [Pg.149]    [Pg.1013]    [Pg.1310]    [Pg.9]    [Pg.118]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.654]    [Pg.1221]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.973]    [Pg.34]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.232]   


SEARCH



Levelling tolerances

Quality level

Tolerance levels

© 2024 chempedia.info