The Kinetic Model

Perhaps the most elegant and exact but therefore the most limited approach to the transport properties is through a general equation such as the Boltzmann or Fokker-Planck equation describing the time-dependent distribution functions of the system. The results of the zeroth-order theories can be conveniently cast in the form of the friction constants of irreversible thermodynamics. 

The friction formalism of irreversible thermodynamics for 1-1 electrolytes yields the following expressions for the electrical conductivity A and the self-dilfusion coefficient D of an ion  

We see that the Nernst-Einstein equation which is useful for solutions at 

The electrical conductance is inversely related to and in this order of approximation all ions of the same sign travel with the same mean drift velocity, so that the only ions of opposite sign exert a net drag in the conduction process. In self-diffusion the reference ion is suffering a fluctuation relative to all other ions, so ions of both signs exert a drag. 

For simplicity of explanation the friction constant between molecules a and for a hard-sphere system are given below rather than those for a system of molecules interacting with continuous pair potentials  

An equilibrium is reached if the variable resulting from two dynamic processes is brought to zero  

These two processes can be seen as two elementaiy steps that do not involve any intermediate reactions. 

In such a case, the Rp rate is proportional to the number of shocks u, which is the number of molecule and surface impacts per time unit, as well as to the number of free sites on the surface. 

During physical adsorption, each adsorbed molecule forms a new active site for the remaining gas molecules, but there is no reason why this process should limit itself to only one layer. The Brunauer-Emmet-Teller theory, which originates from the Langmuir theory, allows us to obtain a relation (BET eqiration) involving a parameter that expresses the influence of the solid s global surface area, that is to say, the area exposed to gas aetion. 

This derives from the applieation of the Langmuir theory to the piled up layers. 

---

Kinetic en aluation Clearly, the most in-depth evaluation would be based on the kinetic modeling of a reaction pathway. Unfortunately, in many cases insufficient experimental data arc available to develop a full kinetic model of a reaction pathway. Nevertheless, it has been shown with various examples that the development of a kinetic model is possible. This has been performed for the acid-... 

The present author was worried about the lack of knowledge concerning the quality of the kinetic models used in the industry. A model is by definition a small, scaled-down imitation of the real thing. (Men should remember tliis when their mothers-in-law call them model husbands.) In the industry all we require from a kinetic model is that it describe the chemical rate adequately by using traditional mathematical forms (Airhenius law, power law expressions and combinations of these) within the limits of its applications. Neither should it rudely violate the known laws of science. 

Ethylene oxide secondary oxidation with C-tagged ethylene oxide, to clarify the source of CO2, was done at Union Carbide but not published. This was about 10 years before the publication of Happel (1977). With very limited radioactive supply only a semi-quantitative result could be gained but it helped the kinetic modeling work. It became clear that most CO2 comes from ethylene directly and only about 20% from the secondary oxidation of ethylene oxide. 

This chapter discusses the kinetics, modeling and simulation of biochemical reactions, types and scale-up of bioreactors. The chapter provides definitions and summary of biological characteristics. 

A mathematical treatment of the kinetic model shown in Scheme 2 gives a decay function as... 

Table 8.1 presents the results of the ICR retention time studies, sugar concentration (dual substrate) studies and cell density. The kinetic model for ICR was derived on the basis of a first order reaction, plug flow and steady-state behaviour. 

Our initial experimental results indicated that the kinetic model— first order in liquid phase CO concentration—was the leading candidate. We designed an experimental program specifically for this reaction model. The integrated rate expression (see Appendix for nomenclature) can be written as ... 

The preferred kinetic model for the metathesis of acyclic alkenes is a Langmuir type model, with a rate-determining reaction between two adsorbed (complexed) molecules. For the metathesis of cycloalkenes, the kinetic model of Calderon as depicted in Fig. 4 agrees well with the experimental results. A scheme involving carbene complexes (Fig. 5) is less likely, which is consistent with the conclusion drawn from mechanistic considerations (Section III). However, Calderon s model might also fit the experimental data in the case of acyclic alkenes. If, for instance, the concentration of the dialkene complex is independent of the concentration of free alkene, the reaction will be first order with respect to the alkene. This has in fact been observed (Section IV.C.2) but, within certain limits, a first-order relationship can also be obtained from many hyperbolic models. Moreover, it seems unreasonable to assume that one single kinetic model could represent the experimental results of all systems under consideration. Clearly, further experimental work is needed to arrive at more definite conclusions. Especially, it is necessary to investigate whether conclusions derived for a particular system are valid for all catalyst systems. 

The change of shape of the kinetic curves with monomer and inhibitor concentration at ethylene polymerization by chromium oxide catalysts may be satisfactory described 115) by the kinetic model based on reactions (8)-(14). 

The radical chain mechanism of the sulfochlorination is very similar to that of the chlorination. Accordingly, in normal cases the regioselectivities of the sulfochlorination and the chlorination are equal. For example, (-1) substituents decrease the reactivities of the adjacent C-H bond. This influence can even be observed at the y position. Thus, the consecutive second sulfochlorination affords no geminal or vicinal disulfochlorides in the product. Where there are differences between the regioselectivities of sulfochlorination and chlorination (as in the case of isoalkanes), it is because under the conditions of sulfochlorination, chlorination also takes place to a considerable extent. Figure 6 shows the main components of a sulfochlorination mixture. Today the kinetics and the regioselectivity of the sulfochlorination of /z-alkanes are so well known that the kinetic modeling of the concentration-conversion curves is possible for all partners of the reaction [12]. 

The reader already familiar with some aspects of electrochemical promotion may want to jump directly to Chapters 4 and 5 which are the heart of this book. Chapter 4 epitomizes the phenomenology of NEMCA, Chapter 5 discusses its origin on the basis of a plethora of surface science and electrochemical techniques including ab initio quantum mechanical calculations. In Chapter 6 rigorous rules and a rigorous model are introduced for the first time both for electrochemical and for classical promotion. The kinetic model, which provides an excellent qualitative fit to the promotional rules and to the electrochemical and classical promotion data, is based on a simple concept Electrochemical and classical promotion is catalysis in presence of a controllable double layer. 

Figure 9.2. Effect of catalyst potential Uwr, work function 0 and corresponding Na coverage on the rate of C2H4 oxidation on Pt/p"-Al203.1 The dashed line is from the kinetic model discussed in ref. 1. pO2=5.0 kPa, pC2H4=2-1 x 1 O 2 kPa, T=291°C, kad = 12.5 s 1. Reprinted with permission from Academic Press.

Figure 9.8. Effect of catalyst potential Uwr on the apparent activation energy and on the temperature (inset) at which the transition occurs from a high ( ) to a low (O) E value. The dashed lines and predicted asymptotic Ej, E2, E3 activation energy values are from the kinetic model discussed in ref. 11. Conditions p02=5.8 kPa, pCo=3-5 kPa.11 Reprinted with permission from Academic Press.

FIGURE 4.23 In the kinetic model of gases, the molecules are regarded as infinitesimal points that travel in straight lines until they undergo instantaneous collisions. 

We now have enough information to turn our qualitative ideas about a gas into a quantitative model that can be used to make numerical predictions. The kinetic model ( kinetic molecular theory, KMT) of a gas is based on four assumptions (Fig. 4.23) ... 

FIGURE 4.24 In the kinetic model of gases, the pressure arises from the force exerted on the walls of the container when the impacting molecules are deflected. We need to know the force of each impact and the number of impacts in a given time interval. 

In the kinetic model of gases, we picture the molecules as widely separated for most of the time and in ceaseless random motion. They zoom from place to place, always in straight lines, changing direction only when they collide with a wall of the container or another molecule. The collisions change the speed and direction of the molecules, just like balls in a three-dimensional cosmic game of pool. 

In Section 4.4, we used a molecular model of a gas to explain qualitatively why the pressure of a gas rises as the temperature is increased as a gas is heated, its molecules move faster and strike the walls of their container more often. The kinetic model of a gas allows us to derive the quantitative relation between pressure and the speeds of the molecules. 

The following calculation of the pressure of a gas based on the kinetic model may seem complicated at first, but it breaks down into many small steps. 

The kinetic model of gases is consistent with the ideal gas law and provides an expression for the root mean square speed of the molecules vnns = (3RT/M)l/2. The molar kinetic energy of a gas is proportional to the temperature. 

The formula for calculating the fraction of gas molecules having a given speed, n, at any instant was first derived from the kinetic model by the Scottish scientist lames Clerk Maxwell. He derived the expression... 

Two types of observations show that our model of a gas must be refined. The qualitative observation is that gases can be condensed to liquids when cooled or compressed. This property strongly suggests that, contrary to the assumptions of the kinetic model, gas molecules do attract one another because otherwise they would not cohere (stick together). In addition, liquids are very difficult to compress. This... 

Do all the molecules of a gas strike the walls of their container with the same force Justify your answer on the basis of the kinetic model of gases. 

The simplest state of matter is a gas. We can understand many of the bulk properties of a gas—its pressure, for instance—in terms of the kinetic model introduced in Chapter 4, in which the molecules do not interact with one another except during collisions. We have also seen that this model can be improved and used to explain the properties of real gases, by taking into account the fact that molecules do in fact attract and repel one another. But what is the origin of these attractive and... 

Doubling the separation of polar molecules reduces the strength of the interaction by a factor of 26 = 64, and so dipole-dipole interactions between rotating molecules have a significant effect only when the molecules are very close. We can now start to understand why the kinetic model accounts for the properties of gases so well gas molecules rotate and are far apart for most of the time, so any intermole-cular interactions between them are very weak. Equation 4 also describes attractions between rotating molecules in a liquid. However, in the liquid phase, molecules are closer than in the gas phase and therefore the dipole-dipole interactions are much stronger. 

What Do We Need to Know Already Much of this chapter stands alone, but it would be helpful to review the kinetic model of gases (Section 4.10) and equilibrium constants (Section 9.2). 

To set up a quantitative theory based on this qualitative picture, we need to know the rate at which molecules collide and the fraction of those collisions that have at least the energy Emin required for reaction to occur. The collision frequency (the number of collisions per second) between A and B molecules in a gas at a temperature T can be calculated from the kinetic model of a gas (Section... 

The kinetic models for the gas phase polymerization of propylene in semibatch and continuous backmix reactors are based on the respective proven models for hexane slurry polymerization ( ). They are also very similar to the models for bulk polymerization. The primary difference between them lies in the substitution of the appropriate gas phase correlations and parameters for those pertaining to the liquid phase. 

The kinetic models are the same until the final stage of the solution of the reactor balance equations, so the description of the mathematics is combined until that point of departure. The models provide for the continuous or intermittent addition of monomer to the reactor as a liquid at the reactor temperature. 

This section is divided into three parts. The first is a comparison between the experimental data reported by Wisseroth (].)for semibatch polymerization and the calculations of the kinetic model GASPP. The comparisons are largely graphical, with data shown as point symbols and model calculations as solid curves. The second part is a comparison between some semibatch reactor results and the calculations of the continuous model C0NGAS. Finally, the third part discusses the effects of certain important process variables on catalyst yields and production rates, based on the models. 

The semibatch model GASPP is consistent with most of the data published by Wisseroth on gas phase propylene polymerization. The data are too scattered to make quantitative statements about the model discrepancies. There are essentially three catalysts used in his tests. These BASF catalysts are characterized by the parameters listed in Table I. The high solubles for BASF are expected at 80 C and without modifiers in the recipe. The fact that the BASF catalyst parameters are so similar to those evaluated earlier in slurry systems lends credence to the kinetic model. 

Reactor Variable Study. Assuming that the kinetic models are valid, we have a means to rapidly explore the effects of making certain changes in the catalyst or in the operating conditions. Fortunately, Wisseroth published the results for two runs at 100 C and two more runs at 20 atm in his Table 3 (1 ). 

---