Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Stabilizer contamination test

Two types of laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate contaminant tests, a catalyst stability test and a high-conversion bromine product test. For catalyst stability testing, only a small amount of catalyst was used (1.5 g) to ensure incomplete conversion of the HBr. If a feed contaminant causes catalyst deactivation, it is apparent as an immediate decrease in conversion. If an excess of catalyst was used instead, even if deactivation occurred at the inlet of the bed, it may not be detected until the region of deactivation moves considerably downstream. This could take many hours or days. [Pg.307]

Onsite Engineering Report for Solidification/Stabilization Treatment Testing of Contaminated Soils... [Pg.41]

In the study of thermal stability, accelerated testing in the form of elevated temperatures has been used by many pharmaceutical companies to minimize time involved in the testing process. This procedure is only valid for simple formulations in which the single major ingredient is broken down by a thermal reaction. In practice, regulatory authorities demand that a shelf-life determined by extrapolation of accelerated test data should be supported by actual stability data obtained by normal temperature storage (Carstensen, 1995). This is because degradation of a product by microbial contamination may well be inhibited at elevated temperatures. [Pg.64]

Fig. 8. Catalyst stability testing at partial conversion using phenol- and fluorobenzene-contaminated HBr feeds. Fig. 8. Catalyst stability testing at partial conversion using phenol- and fluorobenzene-contaminated HBr feeds.
Frozen reference materials have been produced by NIST (Wise et al. 1993). These materials do not have the disadvantages of the oils or freeze-dried materials, but are more difficult to transport. Obviously they have to be kept deep-frozen during transport, which makes their use rather expensive. Since the early 1990 s a new approach in this field has been introduced. This concerned the use of wet, sterilized fish and shellfish samples. These samples, packed in glass jars or in tins, were firstly used in the QUASIMEME program as reference materials for inter-laboratory studies (de Boer 1997). Later, when it appeared that the stability was maintained for longer periods, tests for organic contaminants based on this principle were also prepared. [Pg.122]

A quantity sufficient to carry out the required tests, generally in duplicate, are filled into the containers. Most substances for which there are no concerns for either toxicity or stability are filled by weighing the appropriate quantity into antibiotic vials in a horizontal laminar flow work station. These operations are carried out in a self-contained cubicle to avoid cross-contamination. The vials are then closed with butyl rubber stoppers and sealed with an aluminium crimp seal using an automatic crimping and labelling machine. [Pg.190]

Field fortification (commonly referred to as field spiking) is the procedure used to prepare study sample matrices to which have been added a known amount of the active ingredient of the test product. The purpose for having field fortification samples available in a worker exposure study is to provide some idea of what happens to the test chemical under the exact environmental field conditions which the worker experiences and to determine the field storage stability of the test substance on or in the field matrix materials. Field fortifications do not serve the purpose of making precise decisions about the chemical, which can better be tested in a controlled laboratory environment. The researcher should not assume that a field fortification sample by its nature provides 100% recovery of the active ingredient at all times. For example, a field fortification sample by its very nature may be prone to cross-contamination of the sample from environmental contaminants expected or not expected to be present at the field site. [Pg.1006]

Public information about the specific chemical identity of the surfactants and stabilizers in use is scant(353-355) (Figure 11). Performance of foamed fluids is heavily dependent upon the size and distribution of the individual foam cells that are present, therefore the generator, testing apparatus, pressure and procedures employed are critical parts of the evaluation and the observed results. Contaminants (salts, acids, alkalies, etc) in the liquid phase also can cause drastic changes in foam performance. [Pg.90]

Carbon molecular sieve membranes Resistant to contaminants Intermediate hydrogen flux and selectivity Intermediate hydrogen flux and selectivity High water permeability Pilot-scale testing in low temperature WGS membrane reactor application Need demonstration of long-term stability and durability in practical applications... [Pg.316]

With further work on sensor arraying, more effective means of sensor referencing may be developed to eliminate the effects not only of temperature but also nonspecific binding and test sample contamination. The overall objective is to create label-free optical sensor arrays that require minimal if any temperature stabilization, and as little a priori sample purification as possible. [Pg.261]


See other pages where Stabilizer contamination test is mentioned: [Pg.826]    [Pg.616]    [Pg.152]    [Pg.249]    [Pg.1107]    [Pg.434]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.304]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.122]    [Pg.318]    [Pg.369]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.25]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.26]    [Pg.158]    [Pg.163]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.1009]    [Pg.257]    [Pg.418]    [Pg.81]    [Pg.86]    [Pg.303]    [Pg.316]    [Pg.438]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.399]    [Pg.347]    [Pg.218]    [Pg.388]    [Pg.10]    [Pg.273]    [Pg.134]    [Pg.224]    [Pg.49]    [Pg.95]    [Pg.107]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.152 ]




SEARCH



Stability testing

Testing contamination

© 2024 chempedia.info