Selectivities selectors

Our group also demonstrated another combinatorial approach in which a CSP carrying a library of enantiomerically pure potential selectors was used directly to screen for enantioselectivity in the HPLC separation of target analytes [93, 94]. The best selector of the bound mixture for the desired separation was then identified in a few deconvolution steps. As a result of the parallelism advantage , the number of columns that had to be screened in this deconvolution process to identify the single most selective selector CSP was much smaller than the number of actual selectors in the library. 

A wavelength selector that uses either absorption, or constructive and destructive interference to control the range of selected wavelengths. 

Selective and Override Control When there are more controlled variables than manipulated variables, a common solution to this problem is to use a selector to choose the appropriate process variable from among a number of available measurements. Selec tors can be based on either multiple measurement points, multiple final control elements, or multiple controllers, as discussed below. Selectors are used to improve the control system performance as well as to protect equipment from unsafe operating conditions. 

Other types of selective systems employ multiple final control elements or multiple controllers. In some applications, several manipulated variables are used to control a single process variable (also called split-range control). Typical examples include the adjustment of both inflow and outflow from a chemic reactor in order to control reactor pressure or the use of both acid and base to control pH in waste-water treatment. In this approach, the selector chooses from several controller outputs which final control element should be adjusted (Marlin, Process Control, McGraw-Hill, New York, 1995). 

Catechin and epicatechin are two flavanols of the catechin family. They are enantiomers. The capillary zone electrophoresis (CE) methods with UV-detection were developed for quantitative determination of this flavanols in green tea extracts. For this purpose following conditions were varied mnning buffers, pH and concentration of chiral additive (P-cyclodextrin was chosen as a chiral selector). Borate buffers improve selectivity of separation because borate can make complexes with ortho-dihydroxy groups on the flavanoid nucleus. 

It is in the study of this phenomenon where two-dimensional GC offers by far the most superior method of analysis. The use of chiral selector stationary phases, in particular modified cyclodextrin types, allows apolar primary and atropisomer selective secondary separation. Reported two-dimensional methods have been successful... 

Enantioseparation is typically achieved as a result of the differences in interaction energies A(AG) between each enantiomer and a selector. This difference does not need to be very large, a modest A(AG) = 0.24 kcal/mol is sufficient to achieve a separation factor a of 1.5. Another mechanism of discrimination of enantiomers involves the preferential inclusion of one into a cavity or within the helical structure of a polymer. The selectivity of a selector is most often expressed in terms of retention of both enantiomers using the separation factor a that is defined as ... 

Another important issue that must be considered in the development of CSPs for preparative separations is the solubility of enantiomers in the mobile phase. For example, the mixtures of hexane and polar solvents such as tetrahydrofuran, ethyl acetate, and 2-propanol typically used for normal-phase HPLC may not dissolve enough compound to overload the column. Since the selectivity of chiral recognition is strongly mobile phase-dependent, the development and optimization of the selector must be carried out in such a solvent that is well suited for the analytes. In contrast to analytical separations, separations on process scale do not require selectivity for a broad variety of racemates, since the unit often separates only a unique mixture of enantiomers. Therefore, a very high key-and-lock type selectivity, well known in the recognition of biosystems, would be most advantageous for the separation of a specific pair of enantiomers in large-scale production. 

The screening of libraries of compounds for the desired property constitutes an essential part of the combinatorial process. The easier and the faster the screening, the higher the throughput and the more compounds can be screened in a unit of time. This paradigm has led Still s group to develop a combinatorial approach to chiral selectors that involves a visual screening step by optical microscopy that enables the manual selection of the best candidates [81]. 

First, they compared CSPs 1 and 3 prepared by the two-step solid-phase methodology with their commercially available counterparts (CSPs 2 and 4) obtained by direct reaction of the preformed selector with a silica support. Although no exact data characterizing the surface coverage density for these phases were reported, all of the CSPs separated all four racemates tested equally. These results shown in Table 3-3 subsequently led to the preparation of a series of dipeptide and tripeptide CSPs 5-10 using a similar synthetic approach. Although the majority of these phases exhibited selectivities lower or similar to those of selectors built around a single amino acid (Table 3-3), this study demonstrated that the solid-phase synthesis was a... 

The substantial difference between these two chromatograms was a clear proof that CSP 13 interacted differently with the mixtures of l and d enantiomers. This also indicated the presence of at least one pair of enantiomers that interacted selectively with the CSP. Unfortunately, a tedious synthesis of 16 sublibraries (eight l and eight d) containing decreasing numbers of blocks had to be prepared to deconvolute the best selector. A comparison of the chromatograms obtained from these sublibraries in each deconvolution step was used again, and those selectors for which no difference was observed were eliminated. This procedure enabled the identification... 

Our strategy consisted of the following steps A mixture of potential chiral selectors is immobilized on a solid support and packed to afford a complete-library column , which is tested in the resolution of targeted racemic compounds. If some separation is achieved, the column should be deconvoluted to identify the selector possessing the highest selectivity. The deconvolution consisted in the stepwise preparation of a series of sublibrary columns of lower diversity, each of which constitute a CSP with a reduced number of library members. 

The rapid increase in the separation factors observed for the individual series of columns reflected not only the improvement in the intrinsic selectivities of the individual selectors but also the effect of increased loading with the most potent selector. Although the overall loading determined from nitrogen content remained virtually constant at about 0.7 mmol g for all CSPs, the fractional loading of each selector increased as the number of selectors in the mixture decreased. Thus, the whole method of building block selection and sublibrary synthesis can be also viewed as an amplification process. 

In contrast, there are fewer limitations from the chemical point of view. The preparation of large, well-defined, libraries that involve amino acid building blocks has been demonstrated many times. Carefully optimized reaction conditions for the preparation of other mixed libraries can also ensure that each desired compound is present in sufficient amount. However, the reaction rates of some individual selectors with the activated solid support may be lower than that of others. As a result, the more reactive selectors would occupy a majority of the sites within the beads. Since the most reactive selectors may not be the most selective, testing of a slightly larger number of specifically designed CSPs may be required to reduce the effect of falsenegative results. 

In general, high selectivities can be obtained in liquid membrane systems. However, one disadvantage of this technique is that the enantiomer ratio in the permeate decreases rapidly when the feed stream is depleted in one enantiomer. Racemization of the feed would be an approach to tackle this problem or, alternatively, using a system containing the two opposite selectors, so that the feed stream remains virtually racemic [21]. Another potential drawback of supported enantioselective liquid membranes is the application on an industrial scale. Often a complex multistage process is required in order to achieve the desired purity of the product. This leads to a relatively complicated flow scheme and expensive process equipment for large-scale separations. 

For the separation of D,L-leucine, Ding et al. [62] used poly(vinyl alcohol) gel-coated microporous polypropylene hollow fibers (Fig. 5-11). An octanol phase containing the chiral selector (A-n-dodecyl-L-hydroxyproline) is flowing countercur-rently with an aqueous phase. The gel in the pores of the membrane permits diffusion of the leucine molecules, but prevents convection of the aqueous and octanol phase. At a proper selection of the flow ratios it is possible to achieve almost complete resolution of the D,L-leucine (Fig. 5-12). 

The enantioselectivity a is defined as the distribution ratio of one single enantiomer over the two chiral phases and has been determined experimentally for a variety of compounds (Table 5-1). It has been known from work by Prelog [66, 67] that tartaric acid derivatives show selectivities towards a-hydroxyamines and amino acids. However, from Table 5-1 it is obvious that tartaric acid derivatives show selectivity for many other compounds, including various amino bases (e.g. mirtazapine (10)) and acids (e.g. ibuprofen (11)). The use of other chiral selectors (e.g. PLA)... 

---