Surface sensitivity function

The lines of primary interest ia an xps spectmm ate those reflecting photoelectrons from cote electron energy levels of the surface atoms. These ate labeled ia Figure 8 for the Ag 3, 3p, and 3t7 electrons. The sensitivity of xps toward certain elements, and hence the surface sensitivity attainable for these elements, is dependent upon intrinsic properties of the photoelectron lines observed. The parameter governing the relative iatensities of these cote level peaks is the photoionization cross-section, (. This parameter describes the relative efficiency of the photoionization process for each cote electron as a function of element atomic number. Obviously, the photoionization efficiency is not the same for electrons from the same cote level of all elements. This difference results ia variable surface sensitivity for elements even though the same cote level electrons may be monitored. 

Figure 10 shows a comparison of Scofield s calculated values with experimentally measured values (24) which, in addition to (, are dependent on spectrometer transmission function. The overall agreement between the calculated and experimental values is quite good. The far rightjy-axis in Figure 10 indicates the experimentally accessible surface sensitivities in monolayers (ML) as a function of atomic number. For most elements, sensitivities on the order of 1% of a ML are achievable. 

As indicated above, the penetration depth is on the order of a micrometer. That means that in ATR, absorption of infrared radiation mostly occurs within a distance 8 of the surface and ATR is not as surface sensitive as some other surface analysis techniques. However, ATR, like all forms of infrared spectroscopy, is very sensitive to functional groups and is a powerful technique for characterizing the surface regions of polymers. 

Observations of smooth spalls in iron provided an early, dramatic demonstration of the importance of release wave behaviors. In 1956, Dally [61E01] reported the existence of remarkably smooth fracture surfaces in explosively compressed steel. The existence of these smooth spalls was a sensitive function of the sample thickness. Analysis and experiments by Erkman [61E01] confirmed that the smooth spalls were associated with interaction of release-wave shocks and shocks from reduction of pressure at free surfaces. These release shocks are a consequence of differences in compressibility at pressures just below and just above the 13 GPa transformation. 

Figure 1.22 schematically summarizes the principle of the preferred transition states without sharing of a common metal atom. Whereas we have earher discussed surface sensitivity as a function of the relative ratio of particle surface edge sites and surface terrace atoms, the discussion given above provides a principle for particle size shape differences. 

Measuring the uptake of a gas by a surface as a function of the dose to which the surface is exposed is the most straightforward way to determine a sticking coefficient. In such experiments, great care should be taken to ensure that gas and surface are in thermal equilibrium. In addition, we need to determine the coverage, either by surface sensitive methods (XPS, AES, IR) or by thermal desorption and ensure that adsorption is not accompanied by desorption. 

What was evident in 1950 was that very few surface-sensitive experimental methods had been brought to bear on the question of chemisorption and catalysis at metal surfaces. However, at this meeting, Mignolet reported data for changes in work function, also referred to as surface potential, during gas adsorption with a distinction made between Van der Waals (physical) adsorption and chemisorption. In the former the work function decreased (a positive surface potential) whereas in the latter it increased (a negative surface potential), thus providing direct evidence for the electric double layer associated with the adsorbate. 

In surface science, work function measurements are considered to be rather sensitive towards changes of the sample surface. Work function measurements are used to follow adsorption processes and to determine the dipole established at the surface. During oxygen adsorption and oxide formation the sign of the work function change allows one to distinguish between oxygen atom adsorbed on the surface or sub-surface [30]. 

Preliminary results of DNA sequence detection using the OFRR are thoroughly described by Suter, et al.32 The experimental setup described above for tracking the resonant mode shift is used. An OFRR with RI sensitivity of about 7 nm/RIU was produced and used for these experiments. The OFRR surface was functionalized with 3APS and then DMA was used as an amine-amine crosslinker. The single-stranded oligonucleotide capture probe was synthesized with an amine functional group connected to the 5 end by a 6-carbon linker, and has a 25 base-pair sequence. ... 

The elemental composition, oxidation state, and coordination environment of species on surfaces can be determined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and Auger electron spectroscopy (AES) techniques. Both techniques have a penetration depth of 5-20 atomic layers. Especially XPS is commonly used in characterization of electrocatalysts. One common example is the identification and quantification of surface functional groups such as nitrogen species found on carbon-based catalysts.26-29 Secondary Ion Mass spectrometry (SIMS) and Ion Scattering Spectroscopy are alternatives which are more surface sensitive. They can provide information about the surface composition as well as the chemical bonding information from molecular clusters and have been used in characterization of cathode electrodes.30,31 They can also be used for depth profiling purposes. The quantification of the information, however, is rather difficult.32... 

In the present study the surface chemistry of birnessite and of birnessite following the interaction with aqueous solutions of cobalt(II) and cobalt(III) amine complexes as a function of pH has been investigated using two surface sensitive spectroscopic techniques. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS). The significant contribution that such an investigation can provide rests in the information obtained regarding the chemical nature of the neat metal oxide and of the metal oxide/metal ion adsorbate surfaces, within about the top 50 of the material surface. The chemical... 

FIG. 28. XRD patterns for CdTe films grown with 200 cycles as a function of the Cd deposition potential. Omega had been optimized for increased surface sensitivity in each case. 

In general, the electrochemical performance of carbon materials is basically determined by the electronic properties, and given its interfacial character, by the surface structure and surface chemistry (i.e. surface terminal functional groups or adsorption processes) [1,2]. Such features will affect the electrode kinetics, potential limits, background currents and the interaction with molecules in solution [2]. From the point of view of electroanalysis, the remarkable benefits of CNT-modified electrodes have been widely praised, including low detection limits, increased sensitivity, decreased overpotentials and resistance to surface fouling [5, 9, 11, 17]. 

Motivating the research is the need for systematic, quantitative information about how different surfaces and solvents affect the structure, orientation, and reactivity of adsorbed solutes. In particular, the question of how the anisotropy imposed by surfaces alters solvent-solute interactions from their bulk solution limit will be explored. Answers to this question promise to affect our understanding of broad classes of interfacial phenomena including electron transfer, molecular recognition, and macromolecular self assembly. By combining surface sensitive, nonlinear optical techniques with methods developed for bulk solution studies, experiments will examine how the interfacial environment experienced by a solute changes as a function of solvent properties and surface composition. 

The low pressure behavior predicted by the collapsed model is very sensitive to the choice of Es (see Figure 12) when Es is large and when there is radiative heat loss, extinction will occur at some low pressure because the surface reaction for large Es is a more sensitive function of surface temperature than is radiative heat loss. Thus, at some low pressure, where the O/F flame is weak, the surface reaction, which is almost the entire source of heat, cannot overcome the heat loss. This is the... 

---