Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Static water level

Figure 8 Hydrogeological section through part of Algoma, Winnebago County, Wisconsin showing the arsenic concentration in various wells in relation to the cemented sulhde-rich horizon and the static water level... Figure 8 Hydrogeological section through part of Algoma, Winnebago County, Wisconsin showing the arsenic concentration in various wells in relation to the cemented sulhde-rich horizon and the static water level...
Because residential wells are often open to both the St. Peter aquifer and the overlying confining unit, water levels do not provide an accurate measurement of hydraulic head in the aquifer. Therefore, the water levels measured in residential wells are termed static water levels . This is distinguished from the potentiometric surface , defined by water levels in wells open only to the confined St. Peter and deep sandstone aquifers. [Pg.266]

The relationship between the SCH and arsenic concentrations is clarified, however, if the static water levels in wells are considered. Fig. 8 shows the correlation between arsenic concentrations in well water, the relative location of the SCH, and the static water level measured in the individual wells. The highest arsenic concentrations (greater than 100 p.g/1) occur in wells where the air-water interface in the well is within 15 m of the SCH, while lower concentrations (less than 100 p.g/1) are found in wells with a variety of SCH-SWL configurations. It should be noted that not all wells that have a static water level near the SCH have a high concentration of arsenic. [Pg.273]

Figure 8. Relationship between arsenic concentrations in well water and the relative position of the SCH with static water levels. Arsenic data from WDNR (1995, unpublished). Figure 8. Relationship between arsenic concentrations in well water and the relative position of the SCH with static water levels. Arsenic data from WDNR (1995, unpublished).
In areas where static water levels are at or below the SCH, the borehole provides a direct conduit for atmospheric oxygen to interact with water and the SCH (Fig. 9d). The spatial correlation of high arsenic concentrations with the intersection of the SCH and the static water level also supports this hypothesis as the cause of the more severe arsenic contamination. In wells... [Pg.276]

The source of the oxidant in the severely impacted wells is most likely the borehole. The strong correlation between high arsenic and the interface of the SCH with the static water level in the well, in both confined and unconfined areas if the St. Peter aquifer, indicates that this interaction exerts significant control on arsenic release. Under confined conditions, the air-water-sulfide interface only occurs within the well. Field data also show that in the confined portion of the aquifer, the DO concentration in borehole water is significantly higher than in formation water. The borehole appears to promote oxidation of sulfides in the SCH in wells where the static water level is approximately coincident with the SCH. [Pg.278]

Moderate and low arsenic concentrations are found in numerous wells in the FRV, irrespective of the presence of the SCH in the open interval of the well. These levels of arsenic in ground water do not correlate to the intersection of the SCH with the static water level (Fig. 8), indicating that the sulfide oxidation initiated by oxygen introduced at the borehole does not cause all arsenic occurrences. Tfiere is no single stratigraphic unit that controls the low to moderate concentrations wells with open intervals in the Sinnipee Group, the St. Peter Sandstone, the Prairie du Chien Group or the Cambrian sandstones are all affected. [Pg.279]

The three initial wells were drilled using a 15-cm diameter air-hammer and odex casing that was removed as the weUs were constmcted. Basalt was encountered at a depth of about 9.1 m below land surface at all wells, static water levels he at about 15.2 m below land surface, and the wells are from 21.3 to 22.9 m deep. The wells were constmcted of 5-cm PVC casing, and PVC screen with 0.5-cm machine slots was emplaced in the bottom 3 m of the borehole. Sand pack was emplaced from 1.5 to 4.6 m above the screen and the remainder of the borehole was fiUed with bentonite grout. Preliminary injection and sampling using a submersible pump, capable of... [Pg.405]

The marker compound was detected in an upland well located north of the plant and across the western groundwater divide of this subbasin The static water level in this well stands above the elevation of Spring Creek and water levels near the plant. It is unlikely that contaminated groundwater crossed beneath this groundwater divide through upturned, somewhat poorly permeable beds of dolomite and the thin, artesian sandstone aquifer ... [Pg.271]

Static Water Level Measured on6/3W89(FEET,MSL)... [Pg.43]

Hydrogeology Hydraulic conductivity Hydraulic gradient Porosity 1.8 X lO cm/s 0.0012 fl/ft 0.2 Slug-tests results Static water level measurement Estimated... [Pg.906]

However, very economical measurement of acceleration is possible when the washing machine is equipped with a high-resolution analog pressure sensor with microprocessor control. These pressure sensors come as a separate part or are integrated directly on to the PCB of the washing machine control. They work as differential pressure sensors and measure the static pressure via a hose in the lower part of the suds container, thus measuring the water level in the suds container (Fig. 5.57). [Pg.188]

Gravity Tank An aboveground water storage tank for fire protection and water service. A water level of 100 feet provides a static pressure head of 43.3 psi minus friction loss in piping when water is flowing. [Pg.238]

The experiments of Johnson and Leroy were conducted with a static system with product water remaining in the system, the water presumably being absorbed by the alumina in the catalyst. Johnson and Leroy estimated that the residual water pressure in their system was about 0.1 torr. It was implied (65) that the water level in the experiments of Johnson and Leroy was typical of that encountered in actual catalytic reforming reactors. [Pg.123]

Work at this stage was carried out in order to obtain production data under ordinary field conditions, also to test the existing systems for collection, separation and measurements of the extracted crude oil. These data, then, served as basis for evaluating the effectiveness of the subsequent thermal treatment. Production data on wells located within field sections selected for experimental work were collected and studied with special attention. At the same time, necessary adjustments were made in all components of the production equipment, including those of data collection and processing. Measurements were taken of all primary production parameters, that is, of quantities of produced oil, gases and formation water, of dynamic and static fluid levels, of characteristics of crude oil, gases and water, and of formation temperatures and pressures. [Pg.151]

The reviews of theory, laboratory and field data, and published guidance for engineering applications presented here have identified static and dynamic wave setup components as contributing to the deviation from still water level in the sm-f zone and their relevance to engineering design. Examination of the static wave setup has reinforced the effect of beach slope on wave setup. The theory presented here does not account for the onshore bottom stress acting on the water colunrn due to undertow. [Pg.21]

Resuspension may be conveniently defined as the net transfer of sediment from bottom sediment into the water column. Since the gross transfer of sediment is called erosion, resuspension is the net result of bottom erosion and deposition of suspended sediment. Transfer of sediment changes the wave-mean-suspended sediment concentration with elevation 2 (= z + h, conveniently chosen as the coordinate with respect to the rigid bed as datum) and time t. This choice of datum means that, referring to Fig. 27.3 the rigid-bed level, the static-bed level and the mean position of the fluid mud-water interface are one and same. Fluid mud, if it occurs above this level is taken to be within the water layer (above z = 0). The concentration C z, t) is obtained from the simple sediment mass balance equation in the vertical direction ... [Pg.790]


See other pages where Static water level is mentioned: [Pg.259]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.259]    [Pg.37]    [Pg.38]    [Pg.264]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.275]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.276]    [Pg.277]    [Pg.165]    [Pg.987]    [Pg.66]    [Pg.261]    [Pg.209]    [Pg.455]    [Pg.232]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.287]    [Pg.128]    [Pg.136]    [Pg.213]    [Pg.99]    [Pg.59]    [Pg.90]    [Pg.175]    [Pg.53]    [Pg.2]    [Pg.1]    [Pg.3]    [Pg.837]    [Pg.998]    [Pg.212]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.37 ]




SEARCH



Static water

© 2024 chempedia.info