Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Standard evaluation

Slurry contains 35 g of API Standard Evaluation Base Clay per 350 cm saturated salt solution. [Pg.179]

The basic philosophy has been to standardize evaluation methods, with recommended limit values for the different parameters or indices listed in informative annexes. These or other values may then be adapted in national rules for the thermal environment. [Pg.374]

These QM/MM calculations are in contrast to a standard evaluation of chemical shielding for gas phase water clusters where the classical point charge environment is omitted entirely. The same solvation shell criterion as before was applied, and the system was treated purely quantum mechanically. [Pg.32]

Standard engine bench cycle (SBC), 10 33 Standard Evaluation Procedures (SEPs), 18 544, 547... [Pg.880]

Automated Laboratory Standards Evaluation of the Standards and Procedures Used in Automated Clinical Laboratories, Draft. May 1990. [Pg.236]

Automated Laboratory Standards Evaluation of the Use of Automated Financial System Procedures, Final. June 1990. [Pg.236]

Urban D.J. and Cook, N.J. (1986) Standard Evaluation Procedure for Ecological Risk Assessment., Office of Pesticide Programs, Report No. / 540/09-86/167. Hazard Evaluation Division Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC. [Pg.441]

Ensure that the protocol meets the requirements for compliance with GLPs, and scientifically addresses guideline requirements. It 1s also Important to be aware that 1n some cases more recently published reporting addenda and standard evaluation procedures contain Information critical to proper study design, and therefore, protocol developement. If there 1s a question, check with the regulatory agency. [Pg.60]

Wherever possible, testing should be carried out in accordance with an approved standard. These include the standards issued by the International Standards Organization (ISO), the American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM), and the Deutsches Institut fur Normung (DIN). There are many other standards of international repute, such as the NF, JIS, and BS standards. Most countries have their own standards. These are adjusted to suit local requirements but are based on the main international standards. Evaluations carried out to these standards in a laboratory compliant with the ISO 9001 quality standard carry more weight than those tested under other conditions. Other standards, such as aviation and maritime specifications, are also recognized in their fields. In all cases, the most recent issue of the standard or specification must be used. [Pg.163]

The Figures 18 and 19 contain the results of all examined operating points of both series of measurements. The primary particle size from LII does not show systematic dependence on the DBP value which again is a standard evaluation technique in carbon black production (Figure 18). [Pg.244]

Fratzscher, W., and Eckert, F., "Experience Gained by the Introduction of the Exergy Concept for the Standardized Evaluation of Power and Technological Processes in an Industrial Chemical Complex," Proc. 9th World Energy Conf., l, 85 (1974). [Pg.433]

There have been a number of studies on fuels used for electricity generation. One of these studies focuses on the use of natural gas, heavy oil, or coal in cogeneration of electricity.112 Using a numerical eco-load total standardized evaluation system, these authors found that coal had the lowest eco-load of all alternatives considered. In another LCA study, Goralczyk113 compares hydroelectric, photovoltaic cells, wind turbines, oil, coal, and natural gas and quantifies that electricity from hydropower had the least environmental impact. Schleisner114 focuses on wind farms in a life-cycle inventory study that focuses on the materials used to manufacture the windmills and reports that 2% of the electricity generated during the windmill s lifetime is used to manufacture the windmill components. [Pg.260]

The kinetic scheme for analyzing the thermal fade rate (see Scheme 12) is given by Eq. 6.1. Neglecting a photochemical back reaction 9 —> 7 (see earlier discussion), the system can be characterized using the rate constants of the thermal steps k l,k2 and k 2. All spectroscopic data (see later discussion) indicate that the equilibrium Bi, B2 is very fast (k first-order analysis, the thermal fade rate should depend only on k-. The values obtained experimentally clearly follow first-order kinetics, and the parameters obtained by standard evaluation were given in Ref. 3. [Pg.237]

The discovery of Taxol is a fruit of a National Cancer Institute (NCI)-sponsored project on identification of antitumor agents from natural resources. Bioassay-guided fractionation led to the isolation of this unique compound from Taxus bre-vifolia (pacific yew). Wani et al. also identified another famous antitumor natural product camptothecin. Unlike camptothecin, which was abandoned in the phase of clinical trial because of its severe toxicity, Taxol was almost discarded at the preliminary phase because it only exhibited moderate in vitro activity toward P388, a murine leukemia cell line that was used in the standard evaluation system by NCI researchers at that time. However, it was rescued by a subsequent finding of its strong and selective antitumor activities toward several solid tumors, and more... [Pg.73]

Indium C"ln) Capromab Pendetide. Indium capro-mab pendetide is a new radiotracer for staging patients with newly diagnosed prostate cancer and for those with suspected reoccurrence but a negative localization with a standard evaluation. [Pg.470]

Bascietto, J. 1985. Hazard Evaluation Division Standard Evaluation Procedure Avian Dietary LC50 Test. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D.C., EPA 540/9-85/008. [Pg.409]

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards Evaluation of precision performance of clinical chemistry devices Approved Guideline. NCCLS Document EP5-A. Wayne, PA National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards 1999. [Pg.319]

US Environmental Protection Agency (1985). Acute Toxicity Test for Freshwater Fish -Hazard Evaluation Division Standard Evaluation Procedure. Office of Pesticide Programs. EPA-546/9-85-06. [Pg.136]

Urban, D and Cook, N. (1986). Hazard Evaluation Division Standard Evaluation Procedure Ecological Risk Assessment. EPA Report no. 540/9-85-001-Williams, M.D, (1991). Hydrolysis of Piperonyl But oxide as a Function of pH at 25°C. ABC Laboratories, Inc. Report no. 39164. Undertaken for the PBO Task Force, Washington DC, USA. [Pg.136]

National Committee for Clinical Laboratory Standards. Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative analytical methods Proposed Guideline. NCCLS publication EP6-P. Villanova, PA NCCLS, 1986. [Pg.46]


See other pages where Standard evaluation is mentioned: [Pg.91]    [Pg.146]    [Pg.181]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.216]    [Pg.906]    [Pg.144]    [Pg.155]    [Pg.73]    [Pg.150]    [Pg.527]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.189]    [Pg.42]    [Pg.104]    [Pg.240]    [Pg.230]    [Pg.91]    [Pg.462]    [Pg.658]    [Pg.2849]    [Pg.1291]    [Pg.127]    [Pg.65]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.164 , Pg.463 ]




SEARCH



© 2024 chempedia.info