Slurry reactors catalysts

Survey of the patent Hterature reveals companies with processes for 1,4-butanediol from maleic anhydride include BASF (94), British Petroleum (95,96), Davy McKee (93,97), Hoechst (98), Huels (99), and Tonen (100,101). Processes for the production of y-butyrolactone have been described for operation in both the gas (102—104) and Hquid (105—108) phases. In the gas phase, direct hydrogenation of maleic anhydride in hydrogen at 245°C and 1.03 MPa gives an 88% yield of y-butyrolactone (104). Du Pont has developed a process for the production of tetrahydrofuran back-integrated to a butane feedstock (109). Slurry reactor catalysts containing palladium and rhenium are used to hydrogenate aqueous maleic acid to tetrahydrofuran (110,111). 

Pal, S.K., M.M. Sharma and V.A. Juvekar. Fast Reactions in Slurry Reactors Catalyst Particle Size smaller than Film Thickness Oxidation of aqueous Sodium Sulphide Solutions with activated Carbon as Catalyst at elevated Temperatures. Chem. 

Table XII. Modelling the Methanol Synthesis in a bubble column slurry reactor (catalyst CuZnAl)...

Ethjlben ne Synthesis. The synthesis of ethylbenzene for styrene production is another process in which ZSM-5 catalysts are employed. Although some ethylbenzene is obtained direcdy from petroleum, about 90% is synthetic. In earlier processes, benzene was alkylated with high purity ethylene in liquid-phase slurry reactors with promoted AlCl catalysts or the vapor-phase reaction of benzene with a dilute ethylene-containing feedstock with a BF catalyst supported on alumina. Both of these catalysts are corrosive and their handling presents problems. 

Heat Release and Reactor Stability. Highly exothermic reactions, such as with phthaHc anhydride manufacture or Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, compounded with the low thermal conductivity of catalyst peUets, make fixed-bed reactors vulnerable to temperature excursions and mnaways. The larger fixed-bed reactors are more difficult to control and thus may limit the reactions to jacketed bundles of tubes with diameters under - 5 cm. The concerns may even be sufficiently large to favor the more complex but back-mixed slurry reactors. 

Continuous slurry reactors are generally either of one of two designs. One type uses a reactor loop, generally known as a Buss loop design the other is a co-current hydrogen/fatty acid/catalyst system mainly marketed by Lurgi. Continuous slurry reactors are more popular in Europe, Asia, and South America than in the United States. 

The use of a fluidized-bed reactor is possible only when the reactants are essentiaUy in the gaseous phase. Eluidized-beds are not suitable for middle distiUate synthesis, where a heavy wax is formed. Eor gasoline synthesis processes like the MobU MTG process and the Synthol process, such reactors are especiaUy suitable when frequent or continuous regeneration of the catalyst is required. Slurry reactors and ebuUiating-bed reactors comprising a three-phase system with very fine catalyst are, in principle, suitable for middle distiUate and wax synthesis, but have not been appHed on a commercial scale. 

Slurry Reactors with Mechanical Agitation The catalyst may be retained in the vessel or it may flow out with the fluid and be separated from the fluid downstream. In comparison with trickle beds, high heat transfer is feasible, and the residence time can be made veiy great. Pressure drop is due to sparger friction and hydrostatic head. Filtering cost is a major item. 

The Fischer-Tropsch reaction is highly exothermic. Therefore, adequate heat removal is critical. High temperatures residt in high yields of methane, as well as coking and sintering of the catalyst. Three types of reac tors (tubular fixed bed, fluidized bed, and slurry) provide good temperature control, and all three types are being used for synthesis gas conversion. The first plants used tubular or plate-type fixed-bed reactors. Later, SASOL, in South Africa, used fluidized-bed reactors, and most recently, slurry reactors have come into use. 

The effect of physical processes on reactor performance is more complex than for two-phase systems because both gas-liquid and liquid-solid interphase transport effects may be coupled with the intrinsic rate. The most common types of three-phase reactors are the slurry and trickle-bed reactors. These have found wide applications in the petroleum industry. A slurry reactor is a multi-phase flow reactor in which the reactant gas is bubbled through a solution containing solid catalyst particles. The reactor may operate continuously as a steady flow system with respect to both gas and liquid phases. Alternatively, a fixed charge of liquid is initially added to the stirred vessel, and the gas is continuously added such that the reactor is batch with respect to the liquid phase. This method is used in some hydrogenation reactions such as hydrogenation of oils in a slurry of nickel catalyst particles. Figure 4-15 shows a slurry-type reactor used for polymerization of ethylene in a sluiTy of solid catalyst particles in a solvent of cyclohexane. 

Epoxides such as ethylene oxide and higher olefin oxides may be produced by the catalytic oxidation of olefins in gas-liquid-particle operations of the slurry type (S7). The finely divided catalyst (for example, silver oxide on silica gel carrier) is suspended in a chemically inactive liquid, such as dibutyl-phthalate. The liquid functions as a heat sink and a heat-transfer medium, as in the three-phase Fischer-Tropsch processes. It is claimed that the process, because of the superior heat-transfer properties of the slurry reactor, may be operated at high olefin concentrations in the gaseous process stream without loss with respect to yield and selectivity, and that propylene oxide and higher... 

Calderbank et al. (C6) studied the Fischer-Tropsch reaction in slurry reactors of 2- and 10-in. diameters, at pressures of 11 and 22 atm, and at a temperature of 265°C. It was assumed that the liquid-film diffusion of hydrogen from the gas-liquid interface is a rate-determining step, whereas the mass transfer of hydrogen from the bulk liquid to the catalyst was believed to be rapid because of the high ratio between catalyst exterior surface area and bubble surface area. The experimental data were not in complete agreement with a theoretical model based on these assumptions. 

Catalytic hydrogenation is typically carried out in slurry reactors, where finely dispersed catalyst particles (<100 (tm) are immersed in a dispersion of gas and liquid. It has, however, been demonstrated that continuous operation is possible, either by using trickle bed [24] or monoHth technologies [37]. Elevated pressures and temperatures are needed to have a high enough reaction rate. On the other hand, too high a temperature impairs the selectivity of the desired product, as has been demonstrated by Kuusisto et al. [23]. An overview of some feasible processes and catalysts is shown in Table 8.1. 

Kinetic experiments were carried out isothermaUy in autoclave reactors of sizes 300 and 600 ml. The stirring rate was typically 1800 rpm. In most cases, the reactors were operated as slurry reactors with small catalyst particles (45-90 tm), but comparative experiments were carried out with a static basket using large catalyst pellets. HPLC analysis was appHed for product analysis [22, 23]. 

For small catalyst particles used in sugar hydrogenation (slurry reactors), one would intuitively conclude that the system is safely within the kinetic regime. 

Fig. 1. Comparison between LP201 and the commercial catalysts in a slurry reactor 2.2 Circulating slurry bed reactor...

Equation (1) consists of various resistance terms. l/Kj a is the gas absorption resistance, while 1/ K,a corresponds to the maleic anhydride diffusion resistance and l/i k represents the chemical reaction resistance. The reaction rate data obtained under the reaction conditions of 250°C and 70 atm were plotted according to equation (1). Although catalytic reaction data with respect to time on stream were not shown here, a linear correlation between reaction rate data and catalyst loading was observed as shown in Fig. 2. The gas absorption resistance (1/ a) was -1.26 h, while the combined reaction-diffusion resistance (lJK,a + 1 T]k) was determined to be 5.57 h. The small negative value of gas absorption resistance indicates that the gas-liquid diffusion resistance was very small and had several orders of magnitude less than the chanical reaction resistance, as similarly observed for the isobutene hydration over Amberlyst-15 in a slurry reactor [6]. This indicates that absorption of malei c anhydride in solvent was a rapid process compared to the reaction rate on the catalyst surface. 

CFPs, especially the macroreticular ones, suffer of an appreciable fragility and require considerable attention to mechanical stress when employed in slurry reactors. A case history has been evaluated in this connection [29] and a considerable stability to friction in the case of some Pd / gel-type resin catalysts has been recorded (Figure 8). In any case, it has been observed that a shaken reactor is by far preferable to any rotationally stirred ones [29]. 

An interesting example of the use of a second liquid phase is to facilitate catalyst recycle when the reactor is operated as a slurry reactor. 

The interpretation is straightforward. At reaction conditions the concentration in the film is lowered by reaction, and, as a consequence, the driving force for mass transfer increases. In a homogeneous system this results in high values of Ha. In a slurry reactor this enhancement can occur if the catalyst particles are so small that they accumulate in the film layer. Table 5.4-4 summarizes expressions for the reaction rate or enhancement factor for various regimes. 

Slurry reactors. For three-phase systems the definition of conditions at which (catalyst) particles are in motion is important. Two limiting states with respect to particle behaviour can be distinguished (1) complete suspension, i.e. all particles just move, and (2) uniform suspension, i.e. the particles are evenly distributed over the whole reaction zone. The power required to reach the second state is much higher, while uniform suspension is not often necessary. Circulation of the liquid with the dissolved gas is usually sufficiently fast to provide reactants to the surface of catalyst particles if they are suspended at all. 

In a slurry reactor (Fig 5.4.74), the catalyst is present as finely divided particles, typically in the range 1-200 pm. A mechanical stirrer, or the gas flow itself, provides the agitation power required to keep the catalytic particles in suspension. One advantage is the high catalyst utilization not only is the diffusion distance short, it is al.so possible to obtain high mass-transfer rates by proper mixing. 

Safety. The MR is much safer than the MASR. (1) The reaction zone contains a much smaller amount of the reaction mixture (hazardous material), which always enhances process safety. (2) In case of pump failure, the reaction automatically stops since the liquid falls down from the reaction zone. (3) There is no need to filter the monolithic catalyst after the reaction has been completed. Filtration of the fine catalysts particles used in slurry reactors is a troublesome and time-consuming operation. Moreover, metallic catalysts used in fine chemicals manufacture are pyrophoric, which makes this operation risky. In a slurry reactor there is a risk of thermal runaways. (4) If the cooling capacity is insufficient (e.g. by a mechanical failure) a temperature increase can lead to an increase in reaction, and thus heat generation rate. 

Mass transfer-limited processes favour slurry reactors over monoliths as far as the overall process rates are concerned. Moreover, slurry reactors are more versatile and less sensitive to gas flow rates. However, the productivity per unit volume is not necessarily higher for slurry reactors because of the low concentration of catalyst in such reactors. There also is no simple answer to the selectivity problem, and again, each process should be compared in detail for both reactors. 

Very precise kinetic experiments were performed with sponge Ni and Ru/C catalysts in a laboratory-scale pressurized slurry reactor (autoclave) by using small catalyst particles to suppress internal mass transfer resistance. The temperature and pressure domains of the experiments were 20-70 bar and 110-130°C, respectively. Lactitol was the absolutely dominating main product in all of the experiments, but minor amounts of lactulose, lactulitol, lactobionic acid, sorbitol and galactitol were observed as by-products on both Ni and Ru catalysts. The selectivity of the main product, lactitol typically exceeded 96%. 

Hydrogenation of lactose to lactitol on sponge itickel and mtheitium catalysts was studied experimentally in a laboratory-scale slurry reactor to reveal the true reaction paths. Parameter estimation was carried out with rival and the final results suggest that sorbitol and galactitol are primarily formed from lactitol. The conversion of the reactant (lactose), as well as the yields of the main (lactitol) and by-products were described very well by the kinetic model developed. The model includes the effects of concentrations, hydrogen pressure and temperature on reaction rates and product distribution. The model can be used for optinuzation of the process conditions to obtain highest possible yields of lactitol and suppressing the amounts of by-products. 

---