Sensitivity chemometrics

In the context of chemometrics, optimization refers to the use of estimated parameters to control and optimize the outcome of experiments. Given a model that relates input variables to the output of a system, it is possible to find the set of inputs that optimizes the output. The system to be optimized may pertain to any type of analytical process, such as increasing resolution in hplc separations, increasing sensitivity in atomic emission spectrometry by controlling fuel and oxidant flow rates (14), or even in industrial processes, to optimize yield of a reaction as a function of input variables, temperature, pressure, and reactant concentration. The outputs ate the dependent variables, usually quantities such as instmment response, yield of a reaction, and resolution, and the input, or independent, variables are typically quantities like instmment settings, reaction conditions, or experimental media. 

All these methods give similar results but their sensitivities and resolutions are different. For example, UV-Vis spectrophotometry gives good results if a single colorant or mixture of colorants (with different absorption spectra) were previously separated by SPE, ion pair formation, and a good previous extraction. Due to their added-value capability, HPLC and CE became the ideal techniques for the analysis of multicomponent mixtures of natural and synthetic colorants found in drinks. To make correct evaluations in complex dye mixtures, a chemometric multicomponent analysis (PLS, nonlinear regression) is necessary to discriminate colorant contributions from other food constituents (sugars, phenolics, etc.). 

The amount of information, which can be extracted from a spectrum, depends essentially on the attainable spectral or time resolution and on the detection sensitivity that can be achieved. Derivative spectra can be used to enhance differences among spectra, to resolve overlapping bands in qualitative analysis and, most importantly, to reduce the effects of interference from scattering, matrix, or other absorbing compounds in quantitative analysis. Chemometric techniques make powerful tools for processing the vast amounts of information produced by spectroscopic techniques, as a result of which the performance is significantly... 

Until fairly recently, IR spectroscopy was scarcely used in quantitative analysis owing to its many inherent shortcomings (e.g. extensive band overlap, failure to fulfil Beer s law over wide enough concentration ranges, irreproducible baselines, elevated instrumental noise, low sensitivity). The advent of FTIR spectroscopy, which overcomes some of these drawbacks, in addition to the development of powerful chemometric techniques for data processing, provides an effective means for tackling the analysis of complex mixtures without the need for any prior separation of their components. 

Recent advances in instrumentation range from novel (laser) sources and highly compact spectrometers over waveguide technology to sensitive detectors and detector arrays. This, in combination with the progress in electronics, computer technology and chemometrics, makes it possible to realise compact, robust vibrational spectroscopic sensor devices that are capable of reliable real-world operation. A point that also has to be taken into account, at least when aiming at commercialisation, is the price. Vibrational spectroscopic systems are usually more expensive than most other transducers. Hence, it depends very much on the application whether it makes sense to implement IR or Raman sensors or if less powerful but cheaper alternatives could be used. 

Since the quality of a sensor and its application depends on all components of the sensor system, optical transduction, sensitive layers and chemometrics will be discussed in more detail in dependence on the different approaches. In the final chapter, quite a few applications will demonstrate the feasibility and the quality of such bio or chemosensors. Since miniaturisation and parallelisation are further essential topics in these applications, these approaches will be included. 

The use of ultraviolet (UV) spectroscopy for on-line analysis is a relatively recent development. Previously, on-line analysis in the UV-visible (UV-vis) region of the electromagnetic spectrum was limited to visible light applications such as color measurement, or chemical concentration measurements made with filter photometers. Three advances of the past two decades have propelled UV spectroscopy into the realm of on-line measurement and opened up a variety of new applications for both on-line UV and visible spectroscopy. These advances are high-quality UV-grade optical fiber, sensitive and affordable array detectors, and chemometrics. 

A comparison of Figures 9.18 and 9.19 shows that the acoustic chemometric approach is much more sensitive to changes in the process state(s) of the fluidized bed than the traditional process data alone. Of course an industrial implementation of this process monitoring facility would include both acoustic data and process data, together with relevant chemometric data analysis (PCA, PLS) and the resulting appropriate plots. 

In exploratory chemometric analyses, one must also be careful when interpreting modeling results from autoscaled data. For PAT problems, one can do exploratory analyses using PCA and other chemometric methods to assess the relative sensitivities of different analyzer responses to a property of interest. If antoscaling is done, however, such an assessment cannot be done, as relative sensitivity (i.e., variance) information for the variables has been removed. 

The industrial movement has been bolstered by two decades of advances in materials science, electronics, and chemometrics. Since the inception of CPAC, the pace of innovation in sensors, instrumentation, and analytics has quickened dramatically. The development of more robust, sensitive photodetector materials, microelectromechanical systems (MEMSs), and fiber optics and the perpetual advancement of computing power (as predicted by Moore s law) have both increased the performance and reduced the cost of . As a result, is now a critical part of routine operations within the realm of industrial chemistry. Many general reviews on the subject of (and PAT) have been published [6—10]. A series of literature reviews on the subject of have been published regularly in Analytical Chemistry. 

Simultaneously, major advances have been seen in the development of powerful processing methods, some driven by the progress of related spectroscopic methods such as NIR absorption spectroscopy. Numerous chemometric packages are available for advanced analysis of data. These do not require specialist user knowledge (although caution is required in interpreting results) and provide further enhanced sensitivity and capability to the Raman technique. 

An alternative to the Nicolsky-Eisenman equation to model this space is using an electronic tongue that consists of an array of nonspecific, poorly selective, chemical sensors with cross-sensitivity to different compounds in the solution, and an appropriate chemometric tool for the data processing. In our case, three ISEs and an ANN model is used. 

Autoscaling can also be used when all of the variables have the same units and come from the same instrument. However, it can be detrimental if the total variance information is relevant to the problem being solved. For example, if one wants to do an exploratory chemometric analysis of a series of FTIR (Fourier transform infrared) spectra in order to determine the relative sensitivities of different wavenumbers (X-variables) to a property of interest, then it would be wise to avoid autoscaling and retain the total variance information because this information is relevant for assessing the sensitivities of different X-variables. 

In this situation, it would be ideal to produce a calibration on only one of the analyzers, and simply transfer it to all of the other analyzers. There are certainly cases where this can be done effectively, especially if response variability between different analyzers is low and the calibration model is not very complex. However, the numerous examples illustrated above show that multivariate (chemometric) calibrations could be particularly sensitive to very small changes in the analyzer responses. Furthermore, it is known that, despite the great progress in manufacturing reproducibility that process analyzer vendors have made in the past decade, small response variabilities between analyzers of the same make and... 

CONTENTS 1. Chemometrics and the Analytical Process. 2. Precision and Accuracy. 3. Evaluation of Precision and Accuracy. Comparison of Two Procedures. 4. Evaluation of Sources of Variation in Data. Analysis of Variance. 5. Calibration. 6. Reliability and Drift. 7. Sensitivity and Limit of Detection. 8. Selectivity and Specificity. 9. Information. 10. Costs. 11. The Time Constant. 12. Signals and Data. 13. Regression Methods. 14. Correlation Methods. 15. Signal Processing. 16. Response Surfaces and Models. 17. Exploration of Response Surfaces. 18. Optimization of Analytical Chemical Methods. 19. Optimization of Chromatographic Methods. 20. The Multivariate Approach. 21. Principal Components and Factor Analysis. 22. Clustering Techniques. 23. Supervised Pattern Recognition. 24. Decisions in the Analytical Laboratory. 

---