Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Testing scale

The oxime is freely soluble in water and in most organic liquids. Recrystallise the crude dry product from a minimum of 60-80 petrol or (less suitably) cyclohexane for this purpose first determine approximately, by means of a small-scale test-tube experiment, the minimum proportion of the hot solvent required to dissolve the oxime from about 0-5 g. of the crude material. Then place the bulk of the crude product in a small (100 ml.) round-bottomed or conical flask fitted with a reflux water-condenser, add the required amount of the solvent and boil the mixture on a water-bath. Then turn out the gas, and quickly filter the hot mixture through a fluted filter-paper into a conical flask the sodium chloride remains on the filter, whilst the filtrate on cooling in ice-water deposits the acetoxime as colourless crystals. These, when filtered anddried (either by pressing between drying-paper or by placing in an atmospheric desiccator) have m.p. 60 . Acetoxime sublimes rather readily when exposed to the air, and rapidly when warmed or when placed in a vacuum. Hence the necessity for an atmospheric desiccator for drying purposes. [Pg.94]

First carry out a small-scale test, placing about 0 5 g. of the mixture in a test-tube, adding about 5 ml. of 10% aqueous NaOH solution, and shaking the mixture well. It will be readily seen whether the neutral substance (which remains undissolved) is solid or liquid. Then repeat the extraction on a largo scale as follows ... [Pg.398]

Table 1 is condensed from Handbook 44. It Hsts the number of divisions allowed for each class, eg, a Class III scale must have between 100 and 1,200 divisions. Also, for each class it Hsts the acceptance tolerances appHcable to test load ranges expressed in divisions (d) for example, for test loads from 0 to 5,000 d, a Class II scale has an acceptance tolerance of 0.5 d. The least ambiguous way to specify the accuracy for an industrial or retail scale is to specify an accuracy class and the number of divisions, eg. Class III, 5,000 divisions. It must be noted that this is not the same as 1 part in 5,000, which is another method commonly used to specify accuracy eg, a Class III 5,000 d scale is allowed a tolerance which varies from 0.5 d at zero to 2.5 d at 5,000 divisions. CaHbration curves are typically plotted as in Figure 12, which shows a typical 5,000-division Class III scale. The error tunnel (stepped lines, top and bottom) is defined by the acceptance tolerances Hsted in Table 1. The three caHbration curves belong to the same scale tested at three different temperatures. Performance must remain within the error tunnel under the combined effect of nonlinearity, hysteresis, and temperature effect on span. Other specifications, including those for temperature effect on zero, nonrepeatabiHty, shift error, and creep may be found in Handbook 44 (5). The acceptance tolerances in Table 1 apply to new or reconditioned equipment tested within 30 days of being put into service. After that, maintenance tolerances apply they ate twice the values Hsted in Table 1. Table 1 is condensed from Handbook 44. It Hsts the number of divisions allowed for each class, eg, a Class III scale must have between 100 and 1,200 divisions. Also, for each class it Hsts the acceptance tolerances appHcable to test load ranges expressed in divisions (d) for example, for test loads from 0 to 5,000 d, a Class II scale has an acceptance tolerance of 0.5 d. The least ambiguous way to specify the accuracy for an industrial or retail scale is to specify an accuracy class and the number of divisions, eg. Class III, 5,000 divisions. It must be noted that this is not the same as 1 part in 5,000, which is another method commonly used to specify accuracy eg, a Class III 5,000 d scale is allowed a tolerance which varies from 0.5 d at zero to 2.5 d at 5,000 divisions. CaHbration curves are typically plotted as in Figure 12, which shows a typical 5,000-division Class III scale. The error tunnel (stepped lines, top and bottom) is defined by the acceptance tolerances Hsted in Table 1. The three caHbration curves belong to the same scale tested at three different temperatures. Performance must remain within the error tunnel under the combined effect of nonlinearity, hysteresis, and temperature effect on span. Other specifications, including those for temperature effect on zero, nonrepeatabiHty, shift error, and creep may be found in Handbook 44 (5). The acceptance tolerances in Table 1 apply to new or reconditioned equipment tested within 30 days of being put into service. After that, maintenance tolerances apply they ate twice the values Hsted in Table 1.
The scale-up of filtration centrifuges is usually done on an area basis, based on small-scale tests. Buchner funnel-type tests are not of much value here because the driving force for filtration is not only due to the static head but also due to the centrifugal forces on the Hquid in the cake. A test procedure has been described with a specially designed filter beaker to measure the intrinsic permeabiHty of the cake (7). The best test is, of course, with a small-scale model, using the actual suspension. Many manufacturers offer small laboratory models for such tests. The scale-up is most reHable if the basket diameter does not increase by a factor of more than 2.5 from the small scale. [Pg.414]

Laboratory experiments using rodents, or the use of gas analysis, tend to be confused by the dominant variable of fuel—air ratio as well as important effects of burning configuration, heat input, equipment design, and toxicity criteria used, ie, death vs incapacitation, time to death, lethal concentration, etc (154,155). Some comparisons of polyurethane foam combustion toxicity with and without phosphoms flame retardants show no consistent positive or negative effect. Moreover, data from small-scale tests have doubtful relevance to real fine ha2ards. [Pg.481]

Effects on Visible Smoke. Smoke is a main impediment to egress from a burning building. Although some examples are known where specific phosphoms flame retardants increased smoke in small-scale tests, other instances are reported where the presence of the retardant reduced smoke. The effect appears to be a complex function of burning conditions and of other ingredients in the formulation (153,156,157). In a carehil Japanese study, ammonium phosphate raised or lowered the smoke from wood depending on pyrolysis temperature (158). Where the phosphoms flame retardant functions by char enhancement, lower smoke levels are likely to be observed. [Pg.481]

Feedstock Development. Most of the research in process in the United States in the early 1990s on the selection of suitable biomass species for energy appHcations is limited to laboratory studies and small-scale test plots. Many of the research programs on feedstock development were started in the 1970s or early 1980s. [Pg.43]

The proposed mechanism by which chlorinated dioxins and furans form has shifted from one of incomplete destmction of the waste to one of low temperature, downstream formation on fly ash particles (33). Two mechanisms are proposed, a de novo synthesis, in which PCDD and PCDF are formed from organic carbon sources and Cl in the presence of metal catalysts, and a more direct synthesis from chlorinated organic precursors, again involving heterogeneous catalysis. Bench-scale tests suggest that the optimum temperature for PCDD and PCDF formation in the presence of fly ash is roughly 300°C. [Pg.53]

Flame Resistance. Traditionally, small-scale laboratory flammabiUty tests have been used to initially characterize foams (38). However, these do not reflect the performance of such materials in bulk form. Fire characteristics of thermal insulations for building appHcations are generally reported in the form of quaHtative or semiquantitative results from ASTM E84 or similar tunnel tests (39). Similar larger scale tests are used for aircraft and marine appHcations. [Pg.336]

The insensitivity of nitromethane to detonation by shock under normal conditions of handling has been demonstrated by a number of fljH-scale tests. Sensitivity to shock increases with temperature at 60° C, nitromethane can be detonated by a No. 8 blasting cap. Nitroethane can be initiated only when heated near its boiling point under heavy confinement neither it or the nitropropanes can be detonated in unconfined conditions. [Pg.103]

While research has developed a significant and detailed filtration theory, it is still so difficult to define a given liquid-solid system that it is both faster and more accurate to determine filter requirements by performing small-scale tests. Filtration theoiy does, however, show how the test data can best be correlated, and extrapolated when necessary, for use in scale-up calculations. [Pg.1692]

Apparatus There are several variations of the bench-scale test leaf that may be used, but they all have features similar to the one discussed below. [Pg.1695]

Precoat Procedure Precoat filtration tests are run in exactly the same manner as bottom-feed tests except that the leaf must first be precoated with a bed of diatomaceous earth, perhte, or other shave-able inert sohds. Some trial and error is involved in selecting a grade of precoat material which will retain the filtered solids to be removed on the surface of the bed without any significant penetration. During this selection process, relatively thin precoat beds of I to 2 cm are satisfactory. After a grade has been selected, bench-scale tests should be... [Pg.1698]

The depth of cut involved in precoat filtration is a veiy important economic factor. There is some disagreement as to the method required to accurately predic t the minimum permissible depth of cut. Some investigators maintain that the depth of cut can be evaluated only in a quah-tative manner during bench-scale tests by judging whether the process solids remain on the surface of the precoat beck This being so, they indicate that it is necessaiy to run a continuous pilot-plant test to determine the minimum permissible depth of cut. The use of a continuous pilot-plant filter is a veiy desirable approach and will provide accurate information under a variety of operating conditions. [Pg.1698]

Scaling Up Test Results The results of small-scale tests are determined as dry weight of sohds or volume of filtrate per unit of area per cycle. This quantity multiplied by the number of cycles per day permits the calculation of either the filter area reqiiired for a stipulated daily capacity or the daily capacity of a specified plant filter. The scaled-up filtration area should be increased by 25 percent as a factor of uncertainty. In the calculation of cycle length, proper account must be made of the downtime of a batch filter. [Pg.1706]

For estimating filtration rate (therefore, operating pressure and size of the filter), washing characteristics, and other important features, small-scale tests such as the leaf or pressure bomb tests described earlier are usually essential. In the conduct and interpretation of such tests, and for advice on labor requirements, maintenance schedule, and selection of accessory equipment the assistance of a dependable equipment vendor is advisable. [Pg.1723]


See other pages where Testing scale is mentioned: [Pg.18]    [Pg.50]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.72]    [Pg.466]    [Pg.45]    [Pg.336]    [Pg.133]    [Pg.156]    [Pg.322]    [Pg.124]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.120]    [Pg.281]    [Pg.24]    [Pg.1202]    [Pg.1566]    [Pg.1584]    [Pg.1621]    [Pg.1621]    [Pg.1651]    [Pg.1681]    [Pg.1681]    [Pg.1691]    [Pg.1693]    [Pg.1693]    [Pg.1693]    [Pg.1695]    [Pg.1703]    [Pg.1703]    [Pg.1748]    [Pg.1771]    [Pg.1834]    [Pg.1852]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.202 ]




SEARCH



ASTM test methods bench-scale calorimeters

Advantages, small-scale testing

Apparatus, bench-scale test

Applications, small-scale testing

Bench-scale reaction-to-fire test

Bench-scale reaction-to-fire test measurements

Bench-scale reaction-to-fire test pertinent material properties

Bench-scale testing

Bench-scale testing, characterization

Bench-scale tests

Bench-scale tests program

Bench-scale tests, activated carbon

Combustion testing, small-scale

Confirmatory tests for anions on the semimicro scale

Drift Scale Test

Drift Scale Test Yucca Mountain

Drift Scale Test heating phase

Drift Scale Test mechanical response

Drift Scale Test thermal responses

Drift Scale Test, Yucca

Drift Scale Test, Yucca heating phase

Dynamical scaling tests

Experimental tests of the scaling law predictions

Factors Influencing Small-Scale Testing

Fracture permeability Drift Scale Test

Full-scale fire tests

Full-scale test production (chapter

Full-scale tests

Hydrology Drift Scale Test

Lab scale testing

Laboratory small-scale installation damage testing

Large-Scale Analysis and Testing

Large-Scale Testing

Large-Scale Uniaxial Test

Large-scale field testing

Large-scale field testing pesticides

Large-scale gap test

Large-scale performance property testing

Large-scale reaction-to-fire test

Large-scale sodium thermal—hydraulic test

Large-scale test

Larger scale testing

Limitations, small-scale testing

Micro-scale toxicity tests

Microbial pesticides small-scale field testing

Numerical models Drift Scale Test

Permeability Drift Scale Test

Pilot Scale Testing

Pilot-plant-scale development/testing

Pilot-scale leaching tests

Pilot-scale tests

Pilot-scale tests, activated carbon

Preliminary tests on the semimicro scale

Preparation of solution for cation testing on the semimicro scale

Rapid small-scale column tests

Rapid small-scale column tests RSSCTs)

Scale model tests

Scale-up and Testing of Mixers

Scaling Up Test Results

Scaling functions experimental tests

Small scale gap tests

Small scale tests

Small-Scale Test Procedures

Small-scale field tests

Small-scale field tests genetically engineered

Small-scale field tests organisms

Small-scale field tests pesticides

Small-scale fire tests

Small-scale test chamber

Small-scale testing of catalysts for

Small-scale testing of catalysts for fixed-bed processes

Small-scale-burning test

Special tests for mixtures of anions on the semimicro scale

Temperature Drift Scale Test

Test Method for Color of Clear Liquids (Platinum-Cobalt Scale)

Testing Velocity Scaling Criteria

Testing and Scale-Up

Testing and scale

Testing for anions in solution on the semimicro scale

Testing the Entire Process on a Small Scale

Tests on pultruded GFRP sub- and full-scale structures

Tests temporal scale

Tests with scaling theories

The Big Test Going to Plant Scale

© 2024 chempedia.info