Sample preparation technique development

The complex of the following destmctive and nondestmctive analytical methods was used for studying the composition of sponges inductively coupled plasma mass-spectrometry (ICP-MS), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), electron probe microanalysis (EPMA), and atomic absorption spectrometry (AAS). Techniques of sample preparation were developed for each method and their metrological characteristics were defined. Relative standard deviations for all the elements did not exceed 0.25 within detection limit. The accuracy of techniques elaborated was checked with the method of additions and control methods of analysis. 

Although on-line sample preparation cannot be regarded as being traditional multidimensional chromatography, the principles of the latter have been employed in the development of many on-line sample preparation techniques, including supercritical fluid extraction (SFE)-GC, SPME, thermal desorption and other on-line extraction methods. As with multidimensional chromatography, the principle is to obtain a portion of the required selectivity by using an additional separation device prior to the main analytical column. 

In the analysis of polymer surfaces and interfaces there has been tremendous progress in recent years. This is to a large extent due to the development of surface- and interface-sensitive analytical techniques which previously had not been applied to polymers. It is thus possible to achieve molecular resolution both for the free polymer surface and for buried interfaces between polymers. In addition, suitable sample preparation techniques are available and extremely homogeneous and smooth polymer thin films can be prepared. They may be put together to investigate the interface between polymers. 

The need to understand the fate of pesticides in the environment has necessitated the development of analytical methods for the determination of residues in environmental media. Adoption of methods utilizing instrumentation such as gas chro-matography/mass spectrometry (GC/MS), liquid chromatography/mass spectrometry (LC/MS), liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC/MS/MS), or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) has allowed the detection of minute amounts of pesticides and their degradation products in environmental samples. Sample preparation techniques such as solid-phase extraction (SPE), accelerated solvent extraction (ASE), or solid-phase microextraction (SPME) have also been important in the development of more reliable and sensitive analytical methods. 

Isolation of the products from complex matrixes (e.g. polymer and water, air, or soil) is often a demanding task. In the process of stability testing (10 days at 40 °C, 1 h at reflux temperature) of selected plastic additives (DEHA, DEHP and Irganox 1076) in EU aqueous simulants, the additive samples after exposure were simply extracted from the aqueous simulants with hexane [63]. A sonication step was necessary to ensure maximum extraction of control samples. Albertsson et al. developed several sample preparation techniques using headspace-GC-MS [64], LLE [65] and SPE [66-68]. A practical guide to LLE is available [3]. 

Principles and Characteristics Solid-phase microextraction (SPME) is a patented microscale adsorp-tion/desorption technique developed by Pawliszyn et al. [525-531], which represents a recent development in sample preparation and sample concentration. In SPME analytes partition from a sample into a polymeric stationary phase that is thin-coated on a fused-silica rod (typically 1 cm x 100 p,m). Several configurations of SPME have been proposed including fibre, tubing, stirrer/fan, etc. SPME was introduced as a solvent-free sample preparation technique for GC. 

Standardization of IHC/ICC has been a critical issue for more than three decades, especially with the advances in targeted therapy such as the development of trastuzumab (Herceptin) for advanced breast cancer.51 Nevertheless, standardization is a difficult issue because numerous factors may influence the consistency and reliability of immunostaining results, including fixatives, fixation time, AR, antibody clones, detection system, and interpretation (see Part II). In cytopathology, the situation is even worse due to its variable cell sample preparation techniques. Cytopreparation is. .. the foundation of cytomorphology. 52 We believe it is also the foundation of ICC. Therefore, standardization of ICC needs to start with uniform and reliable cytopreparation. 

All of the samples analyzed were standard one-inch diameter polished thin sections. Whenever feasible the samples received a final, cleansing polish with 1 pm diamond compound made from commercial graded diamonds embedded in "vaseline". Commercial diamond paste has proved unsatisfactory due to high levels of K, Na, Cl, Si, F, and Ca. Samples are then cleaned with carbon tetrachloride, rinsed in ethanol, and coated with vacuum evaporator. This sample preparation technique was developed during our studies of minor elements [16,17] and has proved to produce consistently contamination-free samples. 

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is a powerful and mature microstructural characterization technique. The principles and applications of TEM have been described in many books [16 20]. The image formation in TEM is similar to that in optical microscopy, but the resolution of TEM is far superior to that of an optical microscope due to the enormous differences in the wavelengths of the sources used in these two microscopes. Today, most TEMs can be routinely operated at a resolution better than 0.2 nm, which provides the desired microstructural information about ultrathin layers and their interfaces in OLEDs. Electron beams can be focused to nanometer size, so nanochemical analysis of materials can be performed [21]. These unique abilities to provide structural and chemical information down to atomic-nanometer dimensions make it an indispensable technique in OLED development. However, TEM specimens need to be very thin to make them transparent to electrons. This is one of the most formidable obstacles in using TEM in this field. Current versions of OLEDs are composed of hard glass substrates, soft organic materials, and metal layers. Conventional TEM sample preparation techniques are no longer suitable for these samples [22-24], Recently, these difficulties have been overcome by using the advanced dual beam (DB) microscopy technique, which will be discussed later. 

The OLED is composed of hard and soft layers so that the conventional cross-sectional TEM sample preparation techniques cannot be applied. Figure 10.3 is a first DB microscopy-prepared TEM image of an OLED in cross-sectional view [37], The glass substrate, ITO, organic layers, and A1 cathode are indicated in the image. The microstructure and interfaces of all these layers can be well studied now. The nanometer-sized spots in organic layers are indium-rich particles. We believe the combination of DB microscopy and TEM will greatly advance the OLED research and development in the near future. 

Nowicki et al. [51] point out that in the development of a Soxhlet sample preparation technique for sediment samples, the empty paper Soxhlet thimbles contained organic contaminants which adversely affected results. Glass thimbles were tried and found to be satisfactory. The authors detail the identification of organics solvent-extracted from paper and glass Soxhlet thimbles, and discuss the stability for multiple use of the two materials for trace organic sample preparation. 

However, in relation to sample-preparation techniques there have been few advances, and this remains the major stumbHng block and area for development. The experience to design good systems in this respect is difficult to obtain and requires a good understanding of the chemistry involved and an abiHty to appreciate the precise requirements and the necessary constraints imposed by the sample, its source and the legislation involved. 

Solid-phase microextraction (SPME), a new solvent-free sample preparation technique, was invented by C. Arthur and J. Pawliszyn in 1990. This method was mainly applied for the extraction of volatile and semivolatile organic pollutants in water samples. However, since 1995, SPME has been developed to various biological samples, such as whole blood, plasma, urine, hair, and breath, in order to extract drags and poisons in forensic field. The main advantages of SPME are high sensitivity, solventless, small sample volume, simplicity, and rapidity (Liu et al., 1998). 

Analytical methods for monitoring the compounds were developed or modified to permit the quantification of all 23 compounds of interest. As noted earlier, the compounds were initially studied in small-scale extractions by groups. This approach assured minimal interferences in the analyses conducted during the initial supercritical fluid carbon dioxide extractions. Table II summarizes the data on the recovery of organics from aqueous samples containing the compounds of interest at concentration levels listed in Table I when the sample preparation techniques and analytical methods described were used. For each experimental run, blank and spiked aqueous samples were carried through the sample prepration and analytical finish steps to ensure accurate and reproducible results. Analyses of sodium, calcium, and lead content were also conducted on selected samples by using standard atomic ab-... 

Several years ago, a novel sample preparation technique was developed (10) for sputtering Intact organic molecules from surfaces. The key feature of the technique Is the use of a viscous, non-volatile liquid surface from which to sputter and generate organic secondary Ions. 

---