Sample preparation Subject

It is the intent of this chapter to introduce the analyst to some of the more common procedures that have been established for sample preparation. It is impossible to cover such a subject comprehensively in a single chapter and it will still be necessary for the analyst to seek support from the literature when faced with unusual samples. Fortunately, analytical LC methods have been reported in the literature for over two decades and it is highly likely that a publication exists describing a particular analysis of interest or one very similar to it. The journals that are recommended for reference are the Journal of Liquid Chromatography, the Journal of Chromatography, the Journal of Chromatographic Science, The Analyst and Analytical Chemistry. 

The sample preparation discussed will not include the addition of standards for quantitative analysis as this subject will be dealt with in the chapter on quantitative analysis. Samples can arrive for LC analyses as solids, liquids or a mixture of both and, therefore, the three possibilities must be considered separately. Furthermore, the... 

The use of other important phase systems such as exclusion media, ion exchange media and polar stationary phases such as silica gel have not been discussed as this chapter is primarily concerned with sample preparation. The last chapter will give examples of the use of these other phase systems and explain the separations obtained on a basis of molecular interactions and, at that time, the subject of solvent choice will again be discussed. 

This technique can be applied to samples prepared for study by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). When subject to impact by electrons, atoms emit characteristic X-ray line spectra, which are almost completely independent of the physical or chemical state of the specimen (Reed, 1973). To analyse samples, they are prepared as required for SEM, that is they are mounted on an appropriate holder, sputter coated to provide an electrically conductive surface, generally using gold, and then examined under high vacuum. The electron beam is focussed to impinge upon a selected spot on the surface of the specimen and the resulting X-ray spectrum is analysed. 

How critically interdependent matrix and analytical methods can be is illustrated in the example of the analysis of a soil sample. Table 7.1 shows the method dependent certified values for some common trace elements. The soil had been subjected to a multi-national, multi-laboratory comparison on a number of occasions (Houba et al. 1995) which provided extensive data. The data was subjected to a rigorous statistical program, developed for the USEPA by Kadafar (1982). This process allowed the calculation of certified values for a wide range of inorganic analytes. Uniquely, for the soil there are certified values for four very different sample preparation methods, as follows ... 

Supercritical fluid extraction (SFE) is generally used for the extraction of selected analytes from solid sample matrices, but applications have been reported for aqueous samples. In one study, recoveries of 87-100% were obtained for simazine, propazine, and trietazine at the 0.05 ug mL concentration level using methanol-modified CO2 (10%, v/v) to extract the analytes, previously preconcentrated on a C-18 Empore extraction disk. The analysis was performed using LC/UV detection. Freeze-dried water samples were subjected to SFE for atrazine and simazine, and the optimum recoveries were obtained using the mildest conditions studied (50 °C, 20 MPa, and 30 mL of CO2). In some cases when using LEE and LC analysis, co-extracted humic substances created interference for the more polar metabolites when compared with SFE for the preparation of the same water sample. ... 

In the first LDMS-based detection of malaria in human subjects (unpublished), lOOpl P. falciparum or P. v/vax-infected blood samples, grouped into three different parasitemia ranges—low (10-150 parasites/pl), mid (2 x 103 parasites/pl), and high (25 x 103-60 x 103 parasites/pl)—have been examined using both sample preparation protocols. Parasitemia levels in these samples were previously determined independently for each sample by optical microscopy examination of blood smears. The LDMS data clearly indicate that... 

The results for bacterial whole-cell analysis described here establish the utility of MALDI-FTMS for mass spectral analysis of whole-cell bacteria and (potentially) more complex single-celled organisms. The use of MALDI-measured accurate mass values combined with mass defect plots is rapid, accurate, and simpler in sample preparation then conventional liquid chromatographic methods for bacterial lipid analysis. Intact cell MALDI-FTMS bacterial lipid characterization complements the use of proteomics profiling by mass spectrometry because it relies on accurate mass measurements of chemical species that are not subject to posttranslational modification or proteolytic degradation. 

A study of the difference in monomer sequence length distribution and hence of the possibility of strain-induced crystallization and other structural parameters,including long-chain branching, of samples prepared with the above-mentioned various catalyst systems is under way and constitutes the subject of a subsequent paper. 

Boylan and Tripp [76] determined hydrocarbons in seawater extracts of crude oil and crude oil fractions. Samples of polluted seawater and the aqueous phases of simulated samples (prepared by agitation of oil-kerosene mixtures and unpolluted seawater to various degrees) were extracted with pentane. Each extract was subjected to gas chromatography on a column (8 ft x 0.06 in) packed with 0.2% of Apiezon L on glass beads (80-100 mesh) and temperatures programmed from 60 °C to 220 °C at 4°C per minute. The components were identified by means of ultraviolet and mass spectra. Polar aromatic compounds in the samples were extracted with methanol-dichlorome-thane (1 3). 

Because the instability of the N-oxide metabolite, which was subjected to decomposition during sample preparation (solvent evaporation during offline SPE), online SPE LC/MS became the method of choice for the application. Hsieh et al. (2004) built a system with two TFC cartridges and one analytical column, and another system with two TFC cartridges and two analytical columns for GLP quantitative bioanalysis of drug candidates. A Turbo C18 (50 x 1.0 mm, 5 /.mi, Cohesive Technologies), an Xterra MS C18 (30 x 2.0 mm, 2.5 /mi), and a guard column were used. Protein precipitation preceded injection. The cycle times for the two systems were 0.8 and 0.4 min. 

The view that the clay surface perturbs water molecules at distances well in excess of 10 A has been largely based on measurements of thermodynamic properties of the adsorbed water as a function of the water content of the clay-water mixture. There is an extensive literature on this subject which has been summarized by Low (6.). The properties examined are, among others, the apparent specific heat capacity, the partial specific volume, and the apparent specific expansibility (6.). These measurements were made on samples prepared by mixing predetermined amounts of water and smectite to achieve the desired number of adsorbed water layers. The number of water layers adsorbed on the clay is derived from the amount of water added to the clay and the surface area of the clay. 

The ELISA can be used for identification and quantitation of the protein product (biopharmaceutical) of interest throughout the development, production, and manufacturing process. For example, in the initial development phase, ELISAs can aid in the selection of the best cell line. In the early manufacturing steps, it can be used to identify the appropriate product-containing pools or fractions in process to be subjected to further purification. Because of the selectivity of ELISA, it is a suitable tool to select out the protein of interest from complex protein mixtures, such as cell culture fermentation media or product pools in early steps of protein recovery as well as downstream processing. Even complex mixtures do not require much sample preparation. It is important to determine... 

The selection of labelling need not affect the "blind" nature of the analysis since Q.C. samples do not have to be identified until analyses are completed. Treating the Q.C. samples in "blind" fashion is often important to ensure that they do not receive special treatment. These samples are used as surrogate replicates for real samples and are used to evaluate method performance in lieu of routine unknown sample replicates. Therefore, they must not receive special operator attention or handling. However, the "blind" requirement may be relaxed when sample preparation has been minimal or well controlled, or when automated instrument performance is the sole subject of scrutiny. It may be argued that "blind" labelling is unecessary even when the detection device is under human operator control since any attempt to "adjust" the determination of either Q.C. sample to match its pair mate will be expressed as an anomalous difference D. 

---