Big Chemical Encyclopedia

Chemical substances, components, reactions, process design ...

Articles Figures Tables About

Simulation sampling

A molecular dynamics simulation samples the phase space of a molecule (defined by the position of the atoms and their velocities) by integrating Newton s equations of motion. Because MD accounts for thermal motion, the molecules simulated may possess enough thermal energy to overcome potential barriers, which makes the technique suitable in principle for conformational analysis of especially large molecules. In the case of small molecules, other techniques such as systematic, random. Genetic Algorithm-based, or Monte Carlo searches may be better suited for effectively sampling conformational space. [Pg.359]

Recently, many experiments have been performed on the structure and dynamics of liquids in porous glasses [175-190]. These studies are difficult to interpret because of the inhomogeneity of the sample. Simulations of water in a cylindrical cavity inside a block of hydrophilic Vycor glass have recently been performed [24,191,192] to facilitate the analysis of experimental results. Water molecules interact with Vycor atoms, using an empirical potential model which consists of (12-6) Lennard-Jones and Coulomb interactions. All atoms in the Vycor block are immobile. For details see Ref. 191. We have simulated samples at room temperature, which are filled with water to between 19 and 96 percent of the maximum possible amount. Because of the hydrophilicity of the glass, water molecules cover the surface already in nearly empty pores no molecules are found in the pore center in this case, although the density distribution is rather wide. When the amount of water increases, the center of the pore fills. Only in the case of 96 percent filling, a continuous aqueous phase without a cavity in the center of the pore is observed. [Pg.373]

Figure 7-2. Properties of CAII active site in the COHH state (zinc-bound hydroxide and protonated His 64). (a) Superposition of a few key residues from two stochastic boundary SCC-DFTB/MM simulations with the X-ray structure [87] (colored based on atom-types) the two sets of simulations did not have any cut-off for the electrostatic interactions between SCC-DFTB and MM atoms but used different treatments for the electrostatic interactions among MM atoms group-based extended electrostatics (in yellow) and atom-based force-shift cut-off (in green). Extended electrostatics simulations sampled configurations with the protonated His 64 too close to the zinc moiety while force-shift simulations consistently sampled the out configuration of His 64 in multiple trajectories, (b) Statistics for productive water-bridges (only from two and four shown here) between the zinc bound water and His 64 with different electrostatics protocols... Figure 7-2. Properties of CAII active site in the COHH state (zinc-bound hydroxide and protonated His 64). (a) Superposition of a few key residues from two stochastic boundary SCC-DFTB/MM simulations with the X-ray structure [87] (colored based on atom-types) the two sets of simulations did not have any cut-off for the electrostatic interactions between SCC-DFTB and MM atoms but used different treatments for the electrostatic interactions among MM atoms group-based extended electrostatics (in yellow) and atom-based force-shift cut-off (in green). Extended electrostatics simulations sampled configurations with the protonated His 64 too close to the zinc moiety while force-shift simulations consistently sampled the out configuration of His 64 in multiple trajectories, (b) Statistics for productive water-bridges (only from two and four shown here) between the zinc bound water and His 64 with different electrostatics protocols...
In contrast to the relatively stable fold, the 16 ns MD simulation sampled a variety of different orientations for the bound 1,6-DHN, which we characterized using the distances D1 and D2, defined previously. The ranges of D1 and D2 sampled during the 16 ns MD simulation are plotted in Figure 13-8, which can be grouped into three clusters, an indication of three different binding states. We term these clusters/states... [Pg.363]

Table 68-1 Table of computed nonlinearity values for varying numbers of simulated samples... [Pg.460]

Boylan and Tripp [76] determined hydrocarbons in seawater extracts of crude oil and crude oil fractions. Samples of polluted seawater and the aqueous phases of simulated samples (prepared by agitation of oil-kerosene mixtures and unpolluted seawater to various degrees) were extracted with pentane. Each extract was subjected to gas chromatography on a column (8 ft x 0.06 in) packed with 0.2% of Apiezon L on glass beads (80-100 mesh) and temperatures programmed from 60 °C to 220 °C at 4°C per minute. The components were identified by means of ultraviolet and mass spectra. Polar aromatic compounds in the samples were extracted with methanol-dichlorome-thane (1 3). [Pg.388]

Now that we have simulated sampling the fluid and letting it cool, let us predict the fluid s original temperature (which we already know to be 250 °C). The REACT commands... [Pg.345]

Simulations were performed as follows for at least 90% of the process to be complete, observation periods of 8, 4, and 2 hr were used for c = 0.5, 1, and 3, respectively. The simulated sampling schedule had nine sampling points that varied according to the c value ... [Pg.239]

An Intercomparison study of trace element determinations In simulated and real air particulate samples has been published by Camp, Van Lehn, Rhodes, and Pradzynskl ( ). This Involved twenty-two different laboratories reporting up to thirteen elements per sample. The simulated samples consisted of dried solution deposits of ten elements on Mllllpore cellulose membrane filters. In our data analysis a set of energy dispersive X-ray emission results restricted to eight laboratories reporting six elements (V, Cr, Mn, Fe, Zn, Cd) was... [Pg.108]

Table I. Interlaboratory Comparison of X-ray Emission Analyses, Simulated Samples ... Table I. Interlaboratory Comparison of X-ray Emission Analyses, Simulated Samples ...
Let us instead turn our attention to the consequences of sampling the function at evenly spaced intervals of x. Consider the A function and its transform, a sine function squared, shown in Fig. 3. Suppose that we wish to compute that transform numerically. First, let us replicate the A by convolving it with a low-frequency III function. Now multiply it by a high-frequency III function to simulate sampling. We see a periodically replicated and sampled A. The value of each sample is represented as the scaled area under a Dirac <5 function. [Pg.24]

Air Air collected/derivatized through sodium hydroxide in ethanol neutralization derivatization with heptafluorobutyric anhydride solvent extraction GC/thermionic specific detection 10 pg/ L injected 100% (simulated sample) Skarping et al. 1988... [Pg.156]

Air (total isocyanate) Air collected/ derivatized through tryptamine in 2,2,4-trimethylpentane evaporation derivatization with acetic anhydride HPLC with fluorescence and electrochemical detection 1 ppbfor120L air 90 5% (simulated sample) Wuetal. 1990... [Pg.156]

In Figs. 7, we show the secondary structure of the simulated protein in solution and compare it against that obtained from the crystalline sample. We observed that the secondary structure of the simulated sample is essentially identical to the crystal structure, except for a marginal difference in the ft segment of the protein. [Pg.218]

If a temperature blank is not enclosed in the cooler with samples, the laboratory personnel will randomly measure the temperature in any part of the cooler, and this temperature may or may not accurately represent the true condition. Temperature blanks, being simulated samples, provide an accurate measurement of field sample temperature upon arrival to the laboratory. [Pg.74]

To simulate sample drying, the LGA model removes particles in the course of time [1], The density, i.e. the number of particles per node, changes since particles move from one node to another and accordingly change relative humidity of the sample... [Pg.103]

The working principle is as follows The level of butadiene in a food or food simulant is determined by headspace gas chromatography (HSGC) with automated sample injection and by flame ionisation detection (FID). Quantification is achieved using an internal standard (n-pentane) with calibration against relevant food simulant samples fortified with known amounts of butadiene. Confirmation of butadiene levels is car-... [Pg.318]

In standard molecular dynamic simulations the temperature is not constant. The MD simulation samples the microcanonical ensemble, or NVE ensemble, as the volume (unit-cell size) is assumed to be constant. The control of temperature is on the other hand especially important in the simulation of chemical reactions, when the excess of heat dissipated or adsorbed during the reaction strongly influences the kinetic energy (temperature) of the system. [Pg.231]

Figure 5.4 shows simulated samples of nine tablets taken from a large batch, for which the true mean imipramine content is 25.0 1.0 mg ( SD). Each horizontal bar represents the 95 per cent confidence interval from one of the samples. Out of the 30 samples, we would expect 95 per cent to produce intervals that include the true population mean and the remainder (one or two cases) will be unusually misleading... [Pg.53]

The probability distributions P(cf>, ip) of

[Pg.81]

Table 1.2 Means and standard deviations of active ingredients in simulated sampling trials... Table 1.2 Means and standard deviations of active ingredients in simulated sampling trials...
In the case of alkali feldspars the unit cell is quite complicated. It contains four formula units, and 53 atoms in the asymmetric unit. As a result, the simulated sample of Tsatskis and Salje (1996) had the form of a very thin slab (or film) the computational unit cell defined for the whole slab contained slightly more than four formula units. In the simulation the slab had 101 orientation, which allowed the observation of only the... [Pg.77]

Snapshots of the twin microstructure in the simulated sample annealed below the transition are shown in Figure 6. Only A1 atoms belonging to a single crankshaft and located at T1 sites are shown in Figure 6, and different symbols are used to represent A1 atoms at Tlo and Tim sites. The A1 atoms at T2 positions and all Si and host atoms are not shown in order to clearly distinguish the two variants of the ordered phase. At early... [Pg.78]

A simple, homogeneous (slow) first-order reaction was considered. Simulations were carried out for cases with and without impeller in the same cubical reactor. Initial and boundary conditions are shown in Fig. 7.20. It can be seen that the mean residence time of the reactor is 10 s. Three cases with different first-order reaction rate constants (0.01s", 0.1s", 1.0s" ) were simulated (samples of the results are listed with Fig. 7.20). Results of simulations with an impeller velocity of 5 m s" are discussed first. As expected, for the lowest reaction rate constant, where the characteristic reaction time scale is much higher than mean residence time, the simulated results agree quite well with the analytical solution obtained based on the assumption of a completely mixed reactor. Even for the case of characteristic reaction time scale of 10 s (which is the same as the residence time), deviation from the analytical solution (of predicted outlet concentration of reactant) is just about 1% (for the case with rate constant 0.1 s" ). As the reaction time scale becomes smaller than residence time (rate constant 1.0 s" ), deviation increases and is equal to 33% If the reaction... [Pg.218]

It is notable that such kinds of error sources are fairly treated using the concept of measurement uncertainty which makes no difference between random and systematic . When simulated samples with known analyte content can be prepared, the effect of the matrix is a matter of direct investigation in respect of its chemical composition as well as physical properties that influence the result and may be at different levels for analytical samples and a calibration standard. It has long since been suggested in examination of matrix effects [26, 27] that the influence of matrix factors be varied (at least) at two levels corresponding to their upper and lower limits in accordance with an appropriate experimental design. The results from such an experiment enable the main effects of the factors and also interaction effects to be estimated as coefficients in a polynomial regression model, with the variance of matrix-induced error found by statistical analysis. This variance is simply the (squared) standard uncertainty we seek for the matrix effects. [Pg.151]


See other pages where Simulation sampling is mentioned: [Pg.321]    [Pg.326]    [Pg.18]    [Pg.71]    [Pg.353]    [Pg.366]    [Pg.242]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.190]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.110]    [Pg.35]    [Pg.22]    [Pg.170]    [Pg.64]    [Pg.47]    [Pg.333]    [Pg.109]    [Pg.94]    [Pg.867]    [Pg.870]    [Pg.900]    [Pg.138]    [Pg.145]   
See also in sourсe #XX -- [ Pg.867 ]




SEARCH



A Sample Simulation Program

Atomistic simulation sampling limitations

Basic Sampling Theory and Simulation

Computer simulation sample

Conformation sampling Monte Carlo simulations

Exact Simulation of Sample Paths

Free Energies from Transition Path Sampling Simulations

Generic Sampling Strategies for Monte Carlo Simulation of Phase Behaviour Wilding

Molecular dynamics simulations sampling programs

Monte Carlo simulation different ensembles, sampling from

Monte Carlo simulation sampling procedures

Monte Carlo simulation sampling structure selection

Monte Carlo simulation transition path sampling

Monte Carlo simulations umbrella sampling

SAMPLE resist profile simulations

Sample Results of Simulations

Sample Simulation Results

Sampling distribution simulation studies

Sampling the chemical potential in NVT simulations

Simulated annealing Monte Carlo sampling

Simulated annealing phase transition sampling

Simulating Sampling

Simulating Sampling

Simulation techniques constrained sampling methods

© 2024 chempedia.info